Cargando…

Assessment of target-mediated uptake with immuno-PET: analysis of a phase I clinical trial with an anti-CD44 antibody

BACKGROUND: Ideally, monoclonal antibodies provide selective treatment by targeting the tumour, without affecting normal tissues. Therefore, antibody imaging is of interest, preferably in early stages of drug development. However, the imaging signal consists of specific, as well as non-specific, upt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jauw, Yvonne W. S., Huisman, Marc C., Nayak, Tapan K., Vugts, Danielle J., Christen, Randolph, Naegelen, Valerie Meresse, Ruettinger, Dominik, Heil, Florian, Lammertsma, Adriaan A., Verheul, Henk M. W., Hoekstra, Otto S., van Dongen, Guus A. M. S., Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, C. Willemien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29356983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0358-8
_version_ 1783294289714872320
author Jauw, Yvonne W. S.
Huisman, Marc C.
Nayak, Tapan K.
Vugts, Danielle J.
Christen, Randolph
Naegelen, Valerie Meresse
Ruettinger, Dominik
Heil, Florian
Lammertsma, Adriaan A.
Verheul, Henk M. W.
Hoekstra, Otto S.
van Dongen, Guus A. M. S.
Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, C. Willemien
author_facet Jauw, Yvonne W. S.
Huisman, Marc C.
Nayak, Tapan K.
Vugts, Danielle J.
Christen, Randolph
Naegelen, Valerie Meresse
Ruettinger, Dominik
Heil, Florian
Lammertsma, Adriaan A.
Verheul, Henk M. W.
Hoekstra, Otto S.
van Dongen, Guus A. M. S.
Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, C. Willemien
author_sort Jauw, Yvonne W. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ideally, monoclonal antibodies provide selective treatment by targeting the tumour, without affecting normal tissues. Therefore, antibody imaging is of interest, preferably in early stages of drug development. However, the imaging signal consists of specific, as well as non-specific, uptake. The aim of this study was to assess specific, target-mediated uptake in normal tissues, with immuno-PET in a phase I dose escalation study, using the anti-CD44 antibody RG7356 as example. RESULTS: Data from thirteen patients with CD44-expressing solid tumours included in an imaging sub-study of a phase I dose escalation clinical trial using the anti-CD44 antibody RG7356 was analysed. (89)Zirconium-labelled RG7356 (1 mg; 37 MBq) was administered after a variable dose of unlabelled RG7356 (0 to 675 mg). Tracer uptake in normal tissues (liver, spleen, kidney, lung, bone marrow, brain and blood pool) was used to calculate the area under the time antibody concentration curve (AUC) and expressed as tissue-to-blood AUC ratios. Within the dose range of 1 to 450 mg, tissue-to-blood AUC ratios decreased from 10.6 to 0.75 ± 0.16 for the spleen, 7.5 to 0.86 ± 0.18 for the liver, 3.6 to 0.48 ± 0.13 for the bone marrow, 0.69 to 0.26 ± 0.1 for the lung and 1.29 to 0.56 ± 0.14 for the kidney, indicating dose-dependent uptake. In all patients receiving ≥ 450 mg (n = 7), tumour uptake of the antibody was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates how immuno-PET in a dose escalation study provides a non-invasive technique to quantify dose-dependent uptake in normal tissues, indicating specific, target-mediated uptake. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-018-0358-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5778091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57780912018-02-01 Assessment of target-mediated uptake with immuno-PET: analysis of a phase I clinical trial with an anti-CD44 antibody Jauw, Yvonne W. S. Huisman, Marc C. Nayak, Tapan K. Vugts, Danielle J. Christen, Randolph Naegelen, Valerie Meresse Ruettinger, Dominik Heil, Florian Lammertsma, Adriaan A. Verheul, Henk M. W. Hoekstra, Otto S. van Dongen, Guus A. M. S. Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, C. Willemien EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Ideally, monoclonal antibodies provide selective treatment by targeting the tumour, without affecting normal tissues. Therefore, antibody imaging is of interest, preferably in early stages of drug development. However, the imaging signal consists of specific, as well as non-specific, uptake. The aim of this study was to assess specific, target-mediated uptake in normal tissues, with immuno-PET in a phase I dose escalation study, using the anti-CD44 antibody RG7356 as example. RESULTS: Data from thirteen patients with CD44-expressing solid tumours included in an imaging sub-study of a phase I dose escalation clinical trial using the anti-CD44 antibody RG7356 was analysed. (89)Zirconium-labelled RG7356 (1 mg; 37 MBq) was administered after a variable dose of unlabelled RG7356 (0 to 675 mg). Tracer uptake in normal tissues (liver, spleen, kidney, lung, bone marrow, brain and blood pool) was used to calculate the area under the time antibody concentration curve (AUC) and expressed as tissue-to-blood AUC ratios. Within the dose range of 1 to 450 mg, tissue-to-blood AUC ratios decreased from 10.6 to 0.75 ± 0.16 for the spleen, 7.5 to 0.86 ± 0.18 for the liver, 3.6 to 0.48 ± 0.13 for the bone marrow, 0.69 to 0.26 ± 0.1 for the lung and 1.29 to 0.56 ± 0.14 for the kidney, indicating dose-dependent uptake. In all patients receiving ≥ 450 mg (n = 7), tumour uptake of the antibody was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates how immuno-PET in a dose escalation study provides a non-invasive technique to quantify dose-dependent uptake in normal tissues, indicating specific, target-mediated uptake. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-018-0358-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5778091/ /pubmed/29356983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0358-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Jauw, Yvonne W. S.
Huisman, Marc C.
Nayak, Tapan K.
Vugts, Danielle J.
Christen, Randolph
Naegelen, Valerie Meresse
Ruettinger, Dominik
Heil, Florian
Lammertsma, Adriaan A.
Verheul, Henk M. W.
Hoekstra, Otto S.
van Dongen, Guus A. M. S.
Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, C. Willemien
Assessment of target-mediated uptake with immuno-PET: analysis of a phase I clinical trial with an anti-CD44 antibody
title Assessment of target-mediated uptake with immuno-PET: analysis of a phase I clinical trial with an anti-CD44 antibody
title_full Assessment of target-mediated uptake with immuno-PET: analysis of a phase I clinical trial with an anti-CD44 antibody
title_fullStr Assessment of target-mediated uptake with immuno-PET: analysis of a phase I clinical trial with an anti-CD44 antibody
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of target-mediated uptake with immuno-PET: analysis of a phase I clinical trial with an anti-CD44 antibody
title_short Assessment of target-mediated uptake with immuno-PET: analysis of a phase I clinical trial with an anti-CD44 antibody
title_sort assessment of target-mediated uptake with immuno-pet: analysis of a phase i clinical trial with an anti-cd44 antibody
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29356983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0358-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jauwyvonnews assessmentoftargetmediateduptakewithimmunopetanalysisofaphaseiclinicaltrialwithananticd44antibody
AT huismanmarcc assessmentoftargetmediateduptakewithimmunopetanalysisofaphaseiclinicaltrialwithananticd44antibody
AT nayaktapank assessmentoftargetmediateduptakewithimmunopetanalysisofaphaseiclinicaltrialwithananticd44antibody
AT vugtsdaniellej assessmentoftargetmediateduptakewithimmunopetanalysisofaphaseiclinicaltrialwithananticd44antibody
AT christenrandolph assessmentoftargetmediateduptakewithimmunopetanalysisofaphaseiclinicaltrialwithananticd44antibody
AT naegelenvaleriemeresse assessmentoftargetmediateduptakewithimmunopetanalysisofaphaseiclinicaltrialwithananticd44antibody
AT ruettingerdominik assessmentoftargetmediateduptakewithimmunopetanalysisofaphaseiclinicaltrialwithananticd44antibody
AT heilflorian assessmentoftargetmediateduptakewithimmunopetanalysisofaphaseiclinicaltrialwithananticd44antibody
AT lammertsmaadriaana assessmentoftargetmediateduptakewithimmunopetanalysisofaphaseiclinicaltrialwithananticd44antibody
AT verheulhenkmw assessmentoftargetmediateduptakewithimmunopetanalysisofaphaseiclinicaltrialwithananticd44antibody
AT hoekstraottos assessmentoftargetmediateduptakewithimmunopetanalysisofaphaseiclinicaltrialwithananticd44antibody
AT vandongenguusams assessmentoftargetmediateduptakewithimmunopetanalysisofaphaseiclinicaltrialwithananticd44antibody
AT menkevanderhouvenvanoordtcwillemien assessmentoftargetmediateduptakewithimmunopetanalysisofaphaseiclinicaltrialwithananticd44antibody