Cargando…

New Zealand policy experts’ appraisal of interventions to reduce smoking in young adults: a qualitative investigation

OBJECTIVES: Reducing smoking in young adults, particularly young Māori and Pacific, is vital for reducing tobacco harm and health inequalities in New Zealand (NZ). We investigated how NZ policy experts appraised the feasibility and likely effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce smoking pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ball, Jude, Hoek, Janet, Tautolo, El Shadan, Gifford, Heather
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29229655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017837
_version_ 1783294328510087168
author Ball, Jude
Hoek, Janet
Tautolo, El Shadan
Gifford, Heather
author_facet Ball, Jude
Hoek, Janet
Tautolo, El Shadan
Gifford, Heather
author_sort Ball, Jude
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Reducing smoking in young adults, particularly young Māori and Pacific, is vital for reducing tobacco harm and health inequalities in New Zealand (NZ). We investigated how NZ policy experts appraised the feasibility and likely effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce smoking prevalence among 18–24 year olds. DESIGN: We used a qualitative design, conducting semistructured interviews and applying thematic analysis. PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed 15 key informants, including politicians, senior policy analysts and leading tobacco control advocates. Participant selection was based on seniority and expertise and ensuring diverse perspectives were represented. INTERVENTIONS: We examined nine interventions that could either promote greater mindfulness or introduce barriers impeding smoking uptake: smoke-free outdoor dining and bars; no tobacco sales where alcohol is sold; social marketing campaigns; real life stories (testimonials); life skills training; raise purchase age to 21; tobacco-free generation; smokers’ licence; make tobacco retail premises R18. RESULTS: The policies perceived as more effective denormalised tobacco; made it less convenient to access and use; highlighted immediate disadvantages (eg, impact on fitness); aligned with young people’s values; and addressed the underlying causes of smoking (eg, stress). Participants highlighted some political barriers and noted concerns that some interventions might widen ethnic disparities. Exceptions were social marketing campaigns and extending smoke-free regulations to include outdoor areas of cafes and bars, which participants saw as politically feasible and likely to be effective. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the merit of an approach that combines social marketing with regulation that makes accessing and using tobacco less convenient for young adults; however, political barriers may limit the regulatory options available in the short term. Strategies to support self-determination and address the underlying causes of smoking in young people warrant further investigation. Determining policy acceptability to Māori and Pacific, and likely effectiveness for these populations, should be key priorities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5778289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57782892018-01-31 New Zealand policy experts’ appraisal of interventions to reduce smoking in young adults: a qualitative investigation Ball, Jude Hoek, Janet Tautolo, El Shadan Gifford, Heather BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco OBJECTIVES: Reducing smoking in young adults, particularly young Māori and Pacific, is vital for reducing tobacco harm and health inequalities in New Zealand (NZ). We investigated how NZ policy experts appraised the feasibility and likely effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce smoking prevalence among 18–24 year olds. DESIGN: We used a qualitative design, conducting semistructured interviews and applying thematic analysis. PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed 15 key informants, including politicians, senior policy analysts and leading tobacco control advocates. Participant selection was based on seniority and expertise and ensuring diverse perspectives were represented. INTERVENTIONS: We examined nine interventions that could either promote greater mindfulness or introduce barriers impeding smoking uptake: smoke-free outdoor dining and bars; no tobacco sales where alcohol is sold; social marketing campaigns; real life stories (testimonials); life skills training; raise purchase age to 21; tobacco-free generation; smokers’ licence; make tobacco retail premises R18. RESULTS: The policies perceived as more effective denormalised tobacco; made it less convenient to access and use; highlighted immediate disadvantages (eg, impact on fitness); aligned with young people’s values; and addressed the underlying causes of smoking (eg, stress). Participants highlighted some political barriers and noted concerns that some interventions might widen ethnic disparities. Exceptions were social marketing campaigns and extending smoke-free regulations to include outdoor areas of cafes and bars, which participants saw as politically feasible and likely to be effective. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the merit of an approach that combines social marketing with regulation that makes accessing and using tobacco less convenient for young adults; however, political barriers may limit the regulatory options available in the short term. Strategies to support self-determination and address the underlying causes of smoking in young people warrant further investigation. Determining policy acceptability to Māori and Pacific, and likely effectiveness for these populations, should be key priorities. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5778289/ /pubmed/29229655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017837 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Smoking and Tobacco
Ball, Jude
Hoek, Janet
Tautolo, El Shadan
Gifford, Heather
New Zealand policy experts’ appraisal of interventions to reduce smoking in young adults: a qualitative investigation
title New Zealand policy experts’ appraisal of interventions to reduce smoking in young adults: a qualitative investigation
title_full New Zealand policy experts’ appraisal of interventions to reduce smoking in young adults: a qualitative investigation
title_fullStr New Zealand policy experts’ appraisal of interventions to reduce smoking in young adults: a qualitative investigation
title_full_unstemmed New Zealand policy experts’ appraisal of interventions to reduce smoking in young adults: a qualitative investigation
title_short New Zealand policy experts’ appraisal of interventions to reduce smoking in young adults: a qualitative investigation
title_sort new zealand policy experts’ appraisal of interventions to reduce smoking in young adults: a qualitative investigation
topic Smoking and Tobacco
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29229655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017837
work_keys_str_mv AT balljude newzealandpolicyexpertsappraisalofinterventionstoreducesmokinginyoungadultsaqualitativeinvestigation
AT hoekjanet newzealandpolicyexpertsappraisalofinterventionstoreducesmokinginyoungadultsaqualitativeinvestigation
AT tautoloelshadan newzealandpolicyexpertsappraisalofinterventionstoreducesmokinginyoungadultsaqualitativeinvestigation
AT giffordheather newzealandpolicyexpertsappraisalofinterventionstoreducesmokinginyoungadultsaqualitativeinvestigation