Cargando…

PTED study: design of a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) versus open microdiscectomy for patients with a symptomatic lumbar disc herniation

INTRODUCTION: Lumbosacral radicular syndrome is often caused by a disc herniation. The standard surgical technique to remove a disc herniation is open microdiscectomy. An alternative technique is percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED), which is less invasive. In the Netherlands, PT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seiger, Ankie, Gadjradj, Pravesh S, Harhangi, Biswadjiet S, van Susante, Job LC, Peul, Wilco C., van Tulder, Maurits W, de Boer, Michiel R, Rubinstein, Sidney M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29273659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018230
_version_ 1783294337316028416
author Seiger, Ankie
Gadjradj, Pravesh S
Harhangi, Biswadjiet S
van Susante, Job LC
Peul, Wilco C.
van Tulder, Maurits W
de Boer, Michiel R
Rubinstein, Sidney M
author_facet Seiger, Ankie
Gadjradj, Pravesh S
Harhangi, Biswadjiet S
van Susante, Job LC
Peul, Wilco C.
van Tulder, Maurits W
de Boer, Michiel R
Rubinstein, Sidney M
author_sort Seiger, Ankie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lumbosacral radicular syndrome is often caused by a disc herniation. The standard surgical technique to remove a disc herniation is open microdiscectomy. An alternative technique is percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED), which is less invasive. In the Netherlands, PTED is not currently considered as standard care, and therefore not reimbursed within public health insurance. A pragmatic, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial has been designed to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PTED versus open microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: In total, 682 patients between 18 and 70 years of age with >10 weeks of radiating pain or with >6 weeks of excessive radiating pain are to be recruited from participating centres. Patients must have an indication for surgery based on an MRI demonstrating compression of the nerve root from a lumbar disc herniation. Patients are to be randomised to PTED or open microdiscectomy. The primary outcome is self-reported leg pain measured by the 0–100 mm Visual Analogue Scale. Secondary outcomes include self-reported health and functional status, back pain, self-perceived recovery and a physical examination. Outcomes will be measured the day following surgery, at 2, 4 and 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months. Physical examination will be performed at 6 weeks, and 3 and 12 months. An economic evaluation will be performed from a societal perspective and cost questionnaires will be used (eg, EQ-5D-5L). The data will be analysed longitudinally; the non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome is 5. Bootstrapping techniques will be used for the economic evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval of the Medical Ethical Committee of the VU Medical Centre Amsterdam: NL50951.029.14. The results will be published in an international peer-reviewed scientific journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02602093; Pre-results, recruiting stage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5778332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57783322018-01-31 PTED study: design of a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) versus open microdiscectomy for patients with a symptomatic lumbar disc herniation Seiger, Ankie Gadjradj, Pravesh S Harhangi, Biswadjiet S van Susante, Job LC Peul, Wilco C. van Tulder, Maurits W de Boer, Michiel R Rubinstein, Sidney M BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Lumbosacral radicular syndrome is often caused by a disc herniation. The standard surgical technique to remove a disc herniation is open microdiscectomy. An alternative technique is percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED), which is less invasive. In the Netherlands, PTED is not currently considered as standard care, and therefore not reimbursed within public health insurance. A pragmatic, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial has been designed to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PTED versus open microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: In total, 682 patients between 18 and 70 years of age with >10 weeks of radiating pain or with >6 weeks of excessive radiating pain are to be recruited from participating centres. Patients must have an indication for surgery based on an MRI demonstrating compression of the nerve root from a lumbar disc herniation. Patients are to be randomised to PTED or open microdiscectomy. The primary outcome is self-reported leg pain measured by the 0–100 mm Visual Analogue Scale. Secondary outcomes include self-reported health and functional status, back pain, self-perceived recovery and a physical examination. Outcomes will be measured the day following surgery, at 2, 4 and 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months. Physical examination will be performed at 6 weeks, and 3 and 12 months. An economic evaluation will be performed from a societal perspective and cost questionnaires will be used (eg, EQ-5D-5L). The data will be analysed longitudinally; the non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome is 5. Bootstrapping techniques will be used for the economic evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval of the Medical Ethical Committee of the VU Medical Centre Amsterdam: NL50951.029.14. The results will be published in an international peer-reviewed scientific journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02602093; Pre-results, recruiting stage. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5778332/ /pubmed/29273659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018230 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Surgery
Seiger, Ankie
Gadjradj, Pravesh S
Harhangi, Biswadjiet S
van Susante, Job LC
Peul, Wilco C.
van Tulder, Maurits W
de Boer, Michiel R
Rubinstein, Sidney M
PTED study: design of a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) versus open microdiscectomy for patients with a symptomatic lumbar disc herniation
title PTED study: design of a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) versus open microdiscectomy for patients with a symptomatic lumbar disc herniation
title_full PTED study: design of a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) versus open microdiscectomy for patients with a symptomatic lumbar disc herniation
title_fullStr PTED study: design of a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) versus open microdiscectomy for patients with a symptomatic lumbar disc herniation
title_full_unstemmed PTED study: design of a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) versus open microdiscectomy for patients with a symptomatic lumbar disc herniation
title_short PTED study: design of a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) versus open microdiscectomy for patients with a symptomatic lumbar disc herniation
title_sort pted study: design of a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (pted) versus open microdiscectomy for patients with a symptomatic lumbar disc herniation
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29273659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018230
work_keys_str_mv AT seigerankie ptedstudydesignofanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyptedversusopenmicrodiscectomyforpatientswithasymptomaticlumbardischerniation
AT gadjradjpraveshs ptedstudydesignofanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyptedversusopenmicrodiscectomyforpatientswithasymptomaticlumbardischerniation
AT harhangibiswadjiets ptedstudydesignofanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyptedversusopenmicrodiscectomyforpatientswithasymptomaticlumbardischerniation
AT vansusantejoblc ptedstudydesignofanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyptedversusopenmicrodiscectomyforpatientswithasymptomaticlumbardischerniation
AT peulwilcoc ptedstudydesignofanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyptedversusopenmicrodiscectomyforpatientswithasymptomaticlumbardischerniation
AT vantuldermauritsw ptedstudydesignofanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyptedversusopenmicrodiscectomyforpatientswithasymptomaticlumbardischerniation
AT deboermichielr ptedstudydesignofanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyptedversusopenmicrodiscectomyforpatientswithasymptomaticlumbardischerniation
AT rubinsteinsidneym ptedstudydesignofanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyptedversusopenmicrodiscectomyforpatientswithasymptomaticlumbardischerniation