Cargando…

Relating process evaluation measures to complex intervention outcomes: findings from the PACE-UP primary care pedometer-based walking trial

BACKGROUND: The PACE-UP trial demonstrated positive effects of a pedometer-based walking intervention on objective physical activity (PA) outcomes at three and 12 months in 45–75-year-old primary care patients, in postal and nurse-supported trial arms compared with controls. We explored associations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furness, Cheryl, Howard, Emma, Limb, Elizabeth, Cook, Derek G., Kerry, Sally, Wahlich, Charlotte, Victor, Christina, Ekelund, Ulf, Iliffe, Steve, Ussher, Michael, Whincup, Peter, Fox-Rushby, Julia, Ibison, Judith, DeWilde, Stephen, Harris, Tess
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29357921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2428-z
_version_ 1783294394621755392
author Furness, Cheryl
Howard, Emma
Limb, Elizabeth
Cook, Derek G.
Kerry, Sally
Wahlich, Charlotte
Victor, Christina
Ekelund, Ulf
Iliffe, Steve
Ussher, Michael
Whincup, Peter
Fox-Rushby, Julia
Ibison, Judith
DeWilde, Stephen
Harris, Tess
author_facet Furness, Cheryl
Howard, Emma
Limb, Elizabeth
Cook, Derek G.
Kerry, Sally
Wahlich, Charlotte
Victor, Christina
Ekelund, Ulf
Iliffe, Steve
Ussher, Michael
Whincup, Peter
Fox-Rushby, Julia
Ibison, Judith
DeWilde, Stephen
Harris, Tess
author_sort Furness, Cheryl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The PACE-UP trial demonstrated positive effects of a pedometer-based walking intervention on objective physical activity (PA) outcomes at three and 12 months in 45–75-year-old primary care patients, in postal and nurse-supported trial arms compared with controls. We explored associations between process evaluation measures and change in PA outcomes. METHODS: The MRC framework guided process evaluation. Three quantitative measures (nurse session attendance [dose delivered], PA diary completion [fidelity] and pedometer use [fidelity]) were selected as independent variables in multi-level models estimating intervention effectiveness on PA outcomes (changes in step-counts and time in moderate-to-vigorous PA [MVPA] levels in ≥ 10-min bouts). RESULTS: Dose: attending all three nurse sessions compared with 0–2 sessions was associated with an increase in steps/day at three and 12 months of 1197 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 627–1766) and 605 (95% CI = 74–1137), respectively; and MVPA in bouts (min/week) at three and 12 months by 74 (95% CI = 45–103) and 30 (95% CI = 3–57), respectively. Fidelity: postal and nurse groups showed strong positive associations of diary return with steps/day at three months: postal 1458 (95% CI = 854–2061), nurse 873 (95% CI = 190–1555). MVPA in bouts (min/week): postal 64 (95% CI = 33–94), nurse 50 (95% CI = 15–85). At 12 months, only the postal group effects remained statistically significant: steps/day 1114 (95% CI = 538–1689), MVPA 47 (95% CI = 18–75). Regular pedometer use in the postal group only was associated with higher three-month and 12-month steps/day: 1029 (95% CI = 383–1675) and 606 (95% CI = 22–1190), respectively, and with MVPA in bouts at three months: 40 (95% CI = 6–73). CONCLUSION: Process evaluation measures demonstrated significant associations with PA outcomes at three and 12 months. We cannot infer causality, but the associations between the process measures and PA outcomes suggest that they were important in enabling the trial changes observed and should be considered core components of the PACE-UP nurse and postal interventions. We have shown the MRC framework to be a useful tool for process evaluation of intervention implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN98538934. Registered on 2 March 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5778651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57786512018-01-31 Relating process evaluation measures to complex intervention outcomes: findings from the PACE-UP primary care pedometer-based walking trial Furness, Cheryl Howard, Emma Limb, Elizabeth Cook, Derek G. Kerry, Sally Wahlich, Charlotte Victor, Christina Ekelund, Ulf Iliffe, Steve Ussher, Michael Whincup, Peter Fox-Rushby, Julia Ibison, Judith DeWilde, Stephen Harris, Tess Trials Research BACKGROUND: The PACE-UP trial demonstrated positive effects of a pedometer-based walking intervention on objective physical activity (PA) outcomes at three and 12 months in 45–75-year-old primary care patients, in postal and nurse-supported trial arms compared with controls. We explored associations between process evaluation measures and change in PA outcomes. METHODS: The MRC framework guided process evaluation. Three quantitative measures (nurse session attendance [dose delivered], PA diary completion [fidelity] and pedometer use [fidelity]) were selected as independent variables in multi-level models estimating intervention effectiveness on PA outcomes (changes in step-counts and time in moderate-to-vigorous PA [MVPA] levels in ≥ 10-min bouts). RESULTS: Dose: attending all three nurse sessions compared with 0–2 sessions was associated with an increase in steps/day at three and 12 months of 1197 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 627–1766) and 605 (95% CI = 74–1137), respectively; and MVPA in bouts (min/week) at three and 12 months by 74 (95% CI = 45–103) and 30 (95% CI = 3–57), respectively. Fidelity: postal and nurse groups showed strong positive associations of diary return with steps/day at three months: postal 1458 (95% CI = 854–2061), nurse 873 (95% CI = 190–1555). MVPA in bouts (min/week): postal 64 (95% CI = 33–94), nurse 50 (95% CI = 15–85). At 12 months, only the postal group effects remained statistically significant: steps/day 1114 (95% CI = 538–1689), MVPA 47 (95% CI = 18–75). Regular pedometer use in the postal group only was associated with higher three-month and 12-month steps/day: 1029 (95% CI = 383–1675) and 606 (95% CI = 22–1190), respectively, and with MVPA in bouts at three months: 40 (95% CI = 6–73). CONCLUSION: Process evaluation measures demonstrated significant associations with PA outcomes at three and 12 months. We cannot infer causality, but the associations between the process measures and PA outcomes suggest that they were important in enabling the trial changes observed and should be considered core components of the PACE-UP nurse and postal interventions. We have shown the MRC framework to be a useful tool for process evaluation of intervention implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN98538934. Registered on 2 March 2012. BioMed Central 2018-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5778651/ /pubmed/29357921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2428-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Furness, Cheryl
Howard, Emma
Limb, Elizabeth
Cook, Derek G.
Kerry, Sally
Wahlich, Charlotte
Victor, Christina
Ekelund, Ulf
Iliffe, Steve
Ussher, Michael
Whincup, Peter
Fox-Rushby, Julia
Ibison, Judith
DeWilde, Stephen
Harris, Tess
Relating process evaluation measures to complex intervention outcomes: findings from the PACE-UP primary care pedometer-based walking trial
title Relating process evaluation measures to complex intervention outcomes: findings from the PACE-UP primary care pedometer-based walking trial
title_full Relating process evaluation measures to complex intervention outcomes: findings from the PACE-UP primary care pedometer-based walking trial
title_fullStr Relating process evaluation measures to complex intervention outcomes: findings from the PACE-UP primary care pedometer-based walking trial
title_full_unstemmed Relating process evaluation measures to complex intervention outcomes: findings from the PACE-UP primary care pedometer-based walking trial
title_short Relating process evaluation measures to complex intervention outcomes: findings from the PACE-UP primary care pedometer-based walking trial
title_sort relating process evaluation measures to complex intervention outcomes: findings from the pace-up primary care pedometer-based walking trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29357921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2428-z
work_keys_str_mv AT furnesscheryl relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT howardemma relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT limbelizabeth relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT cookderekg relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT kerrysally relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT wahlichcharlotte relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT victorchristina relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT ekelundulf relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT iliffesteve relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT usshermichael relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT whincuppeter relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT foxrushbyjulia relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT ibisonjudith relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT dewildestephen relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial
AT harristess relatingprocessevaluationmeasurestocomplexinterventionoutcomesfindingsfromthepaceupprimarycarepedometerbasedwalkingtrial