Cargando…

Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations

BACKGROUND: Due to its epidemiological relevance, several studies have been performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests and treatments in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed economic evaluations on diagnosis of inherited CRC-syndromes and genetic tests for the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guglielmo, Annamaria, Staropoli, Nicoletta, Giancotti, Monica, Mauro, Marianna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29386984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0085-z
_version_ 1783294403102638080
author Guglielmo, Annamaria
Staropoli, Nicoletta
Giancotti, Monica
Mauro, Marianna
author_facet Guglielmo, Annamaria
Staropoli, Nicoletta
Giancotti, Monica
Mauro, Marianna
author_sort Guglielmo, Annamaria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to its epidemiological relevance, several studies have been performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests and treatments in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed economic evaluations on diagnosis of inherited CRC-syndromes and genetic tests for the detection of mutations associated with response to therapeutics. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed by searching the main literature databases for relevant papers on the field, published in the last 5 years. RESULTS: 20 studies were included in the final analysis: 14 investigating the cost-effectiveness of hereditary-CRC screening; 5 evaluating the cost-effectiveness of KRAS mutation assessment before treatment; and 1 study analysing the cost-effectiveness of genetic tests for early-stage CRC patients prognosis. Overall, we found that: (a) screening strategies among CRC patients were more effective than no screening; (b) all the evaluated interventions were cost-saving for certain willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold; and (c) all new CRC patients diagnosed at age 70 or below should be screened. Regarding patients treatment, we found that KRAS testing is economically sustainable only if anticipated in patients with non-metastatic CRC (mCRC), while becoming unsustainable, due to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) beyond the levels of WTP-threshold, in all others evaluated scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: The poor evidence in the field, combined to the number of assumptions done to perform the models, lead us to a high level of uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness of genetic evaluations in CRC, suggesting that major research is required in order to assess the best combination among detection tests, type of genetic test screening and targeted-therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0085-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5778687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57786872018-01-31 Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations Guglielmo, Annamaria Staropoli, Nicoletta Giancotti, Monica Mauro, Marianna Cost Eff Resour Alloc Review BACKGROUND: Due to its epidemiological relevance, several studies have been performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests and treatments in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed economic evaluations on diagnosis of inherited CRC-syndromes and genetic tests for the detection of mutations associated with response to therapeutics. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed by searching the main literature databases for relevant papers on the field, published in the last 5 years. RESULTS: 20 studies were included in the final analysis: 14 investigating the cost-effectiveness of hereditary-CRC screening; 5 evaluating the cost-effectiveness of KRAS mutation assessment before treatment; and 1 study analysing the cost-effectiveness of genetic tests for early-stage CRC patients prognosis. Overall, we found that: (a) screening strategies among CRC patients were more effective than no screening; (b) all the evaluated interventions were cost-saving for certain willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold; and (c) all new CRC patients diagnosed at age 70 or below should be screened. Regarding patients treatment, we found that KRAS testing is economically sustainable only if anticipated in patients with non-metastatic CRC (mCRC), while becoming unsustainable, due to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) beyond the levels of WTP-threshold, in all others evaluated scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: The poor evidence in the field, combined to the number of assumptions done to perform the models, lead us to a high level of uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness of genetic evaluations in CRC, suggesting that major research is required in order to assess the best combination among detection tests, type of genetic test screening and targeted-therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0085-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5778687/ /pubmed/29386984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0085-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Guglielmo, Annamaria
Staropoli, Nicoletta
Giancotti, Monica
Mauro, Marianna
Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations
title Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations
title_full Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations
title_fullStr Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations
title_full_unstemmed Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations
title_short Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations
title_sort personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29386984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0085-z
work_keys_str_mv AT guglielmoannamaria personalizedmedicineincolorectalcancerdiagnosisandtreatmentasystematicreviewofhealtheconomicevaluations
AT staropolinicoletta personalizedmedicineincolorectalcancerdiagnosisandtreatmentasystematicreviewofhealtheconomicevaluations
AT giancottimonica personalizedmedicineincolorectalcancerdiagnosisandtreatmentasystematicreviewofhealtheconomicevaluations
AT mauromarianna personalizedmedicineincolorectalcancerdiagnosisandtreatmentasystematicreviewofhealtheconomicevaluations