Cargando…

In Vivo Validation of Patient‐Specific Pressure Gradient Calculations for Iliac Artery Stenosis Severity Assessment

BACKGROUND: Currently, the decision to treat iliac artery stenoses is mainly based on visual inspection of digital subtraction angiographies. Intra‐arterial pressure measurements can provide clinicians with accurate hemodynamic information. However, pressure measurements are rarely performed because...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heinen, Stefan G. H., van den Heuvel, Daniel A.F., Huberts, Wouter, de Boer, Sanne W., van de Vosse, Frans N., Delhaas, Tammo, de Vries, Jean‐Paul P. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29275367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007328
_version_ 1783294464777781248
author Heinen, Stefan G. H.
van den Heuvel, Daniel A.F.
Huberts, Wouter
de Boer, Sanne W.
van de Vosse, Frans N.
Delhaas, Tammo
de Vries, Jean‐Paul P. M.
author_facet Heinen, Stefan G. H.
van den Heuvel, Daniel A.F.
Huberts, Wouter
de Boer, Sanne W.
van de Vosse, Frans N.
Delhaas, Tammo
de Vries, Jean‐Paul P. M.
author_sort Heinen, Stefan G. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, the decision to treat iliac artery stenoses is mainly based on visual inspection of digital subtraction angiographies. Intra‐arterial pressure measurements can provide clinicians with accurate hemodynamic information. However, pressure measurements are rarely performed because of their invasiveness and the time required. Therefore, the aim of the study was to test the feasibility of a computational model that can predict translesional pressure gradients across iliac artery stenoses on the basis of imaging data only. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (N=21) with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease and a peak systolic velocity ratio between 2.5 and 5.0 were included in the study. Patients underwent per‐procedural 3‐dimensional rotational angiography and hyperemic intra‐arterial translesional pressure measurements. Vascular anatomical features were reconstructed from the 3‐dimensional rotational angiography data into an axisymmetrical 2‐dimensional computational mesh, and flow was estimated on the basis of the stenosis geometry. Computational fluid dynamics were performed to predict the pressure gradient and were compared with the measured pressure gradients. A good agreement by overlapping error bars of the predicted and measured pressure gradients was found in 21 of 25 lesions. Stratification of the stenosis on the basis of the predicted pressure gradient into hemodynamic not significant (<10 mm Hg) and hemodynamic significant (≥10 mm Hg) resulted in sensitivity, specificity, and overall predictive values of 95%, 60%, and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of the patient‐specific computational model to predict the hyperemic translesional pressure gradient over iliac artery stenosis was successfully tested. Presented results suggest that, with further optimization and corroboration, the model can become a valuable aid to the diagnosis of equivocal iliac artery stenosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.trialregister.nl. Unique identifier: NTR5085.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5779042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57790422018-01-26 In Vivo Validation of Patient‐Specific Pressure Gradient Calculations for Iliac Artery Stenosis Severity Assessment Heinen, Stefan G. H. van den Heuvel, Daniel A.F. Huberts, Wouter de Boer, Sanne W. van de Vosse, Frans N. Delhaas, Tammo de Vries, Jean‐Paul P. M. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Currently, the decision to treat iliac artery stenoses is mainly based on visual inspection of digital subtraction angiographies. Intra‐arterial pressure measurements can provide clinicians with accurate hemodynamic information. However, pressure measurements are rarely performed because of their invasiveness and the time required. Therefore, the aim of the study was to test the feasibility of a computational model that can predict translesional pressure gradients across iliac artery stenoses on the basis of imaging data only. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (N=21) with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease and a peak systolic velocity ratio between 2.5 and 5.0 were included in the study. Patients underwent per‐procedural 3‐dimensional rotational angiography and hyperemic intra‐arterial translesional pressure measurements. Vascular anatomical features were reconstructed from the 3‐dimensional rotational angiography data into an axisymmetrical 2‐dimensional computational mesh, and flow was estimated on the basis of the stenosis geometry. Computational fluid dynamics were performed to predict the pressure gradient and were compared with the measured pressure gradients. A good agreement by overlapping error bars of the predicted and measured pressure gradients was found in 21 of 25 lesions. Stratification of the stenosis on the basis of the predicted pressure gradient into hemodynamic not significant (<10 mm Hg) and hemodynamic significant (≥10 mm Hg) resulted in sensitivity, specificity, and overall predictive values of 95%, 60%, and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of the patient‐specific computational model to predict the hyperemic translesional pressure gradient over iliac artery stenosis was successfully tested. Presented results suggest that, with further optimization and corroboration, the model can become a valuable aid to the diagnosis of equivocal iliac artery stenosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.trialregister.nl. Unique identifier: NTR5085. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5779042/ /pubmed/29275367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007328 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Heinen, Stefan G. H.
van den Heuvel, Daniel A.F.
Huberts, Wouter
de Boer, Sanne W.
van de Vosse, Frans N.
Delhaas, Tammo
de Vries, Jean‐Paul P. M.
In Vivo Validation of Patient‐Specific Pressure Gradient Calculations for Iliac Artery Stenosis Severity Assessment
title In Vivo Validation of Patient‐Specific Pressure Gradient Calculations for Iliac Artery Stenosis Severity Assessment
title_full In Vivo Validation of Patient‐Specific Pressure Gradient Calculations for Iliac Artery Stenosis Severity Assessment
title_fullStr In Vivo Validation of Patient‐Specific Pressure Gradient Calculations for Iliac Artery Stenosis Severity Assessment
title_full_unstemmed In Vivo Validation of Patient‐Specific Pressure Gradient Calculations for Iliac Artery Stenosis Severity Assessment
title_short In Vivo Validation of Patient‐Specific Pressure Gradient Calculations for Iliac Artery Stenosis Severity Assessment
title_sort in vivo validation of patient‐specific pressure gradient calculations for iliac artery stenosis severity assessment
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29275367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007328
work_keys_str_mv AT heinenstefangh invivovalidationofpatientspecificpressuregradientcalculationsforiliacarterystenosisseverityassessment
AT vandenheuveldanielaf invivovalidationofpatientspecificpressuregradientcalculationsforiliacarterystenosisseverityassessment
AT hubertswouter invivovalidationofpatientspecificpressuregradientcalculationsforiliacarterystenosisseverityassessment
AT deboersannew invivovalidationofpatientspecificpressuregradientcalculationsforiliacarterystenosisseverityassessment
AT vandevossefransn invivovalidationofpatientspecificpressuregradientcalculationsforiliacarterystenosisseverityassessment
AT delhaastammo invivovalidationofpatientspecificpressuregradientcalculationsforiliacarterystenosisseverityassessment
AT devriesjeanpaulpm invivovalidationofpatientspecificpressuregradientcalculationsforiliacarterystenosisseverityassessment