Cargando…
Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study
Patients with delusions exhibit an increased tendency to arrive at decisions based on very limited evidence (jumping-to-conclusions; JTC), making this reasoning bias relevant for the treatment of delusions. Neurocognitive deficits contribute to JTC, but it is not known whether this has any bearing o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2015.02.001 |
_version_ | 1783294505793880064 |
---|---|
author | Andreou, Christina Schneider, Brooke C. Balzan, Ryan Luedecke, Daniel Roesch-Ely, Daniela Moritz, Steffen |
author_facet | Andreou, Christina Schneider, Brooke C. Balzan, Ryan Luedecke, Daniel Roesch-Ely, Daniela Moritz, Steffen |
author_sort | Andreou, Christina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients with delusions exhibit an increased tendency to arrive at decisions based on very limited evidence (jumping-to-conclusions; JTC), making this reasoning bias relevant for the treatment of delusions. Neurocognitive deficits contribute to JTC, but it is not known whether this has any bearing on the clinical syndrome of delusions. We addressed this question by reanalyzing data from an efficacy study of non-pharmacological interventions as adjunctive treatments in schizophrenia. We investigated the longitudinal associations of cognitive functioning, JTC and delusions in patients with psychotic disorders receiving either a metacognitive intervention addressing reasoning biases (n = 59), or cognitive remediation (n = 58). Both interventions improved JTC; in the cognitive remediation group, tentative evidence suggested that better neurocognitive performance contributed to this improvement. However, JTC gains were associated with delusion improvement only in the metacognitive intervention group, suggesting a content-specific mechanism of action. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5779293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57792932018-01-29 Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study Andreou, Christina Schneider, Brooke C. Balzan, Ryan Luedecke, Daniel Roesch-Ely, Daniela Moritz, Steffen Schizophr Res Cogn Article Patients with delusions exhibit an increased tendency to arrive at decisions based on very limited evidence (jumping-to-conclusions; JTC), making this reasoning bias relevant for the treatment of delusions. Neurocognitive deficits contribute to JTC, but it is not known whether this has any bearing on the clinical syndrome of delusions. We addressed this question by reanalyzing data from an efficacy study of non-pharmacological interventions as adjunctive treatments in schizophrenia. We investigated the longitudinal associations of cognitive functioning, JTC and delusions in patients with psychotic disorders receiving either a metacognitive intervention addressing reasoning biases (n = 59), or cognitive remediation (n = 58). Both interventions improved JTC; in the cognitive remediation group, tentative evidence suggested that better neurocognitive performance contributed to this improvement. However, JTC gains were associated with delusion improvement only in the metacognitive intervention group, suggesting a content-specific mechanism of action. Elsevier 2015-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5779293/ /pubmed/29379755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2015.02.001 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Andreou, Christina Schneider, Brooke C. Balzan, Ryan Luedecke, Daniel Roesch-Ely, Daniela Moritz, Steffen Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study |
title | Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study |
title_full | Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study |
title_fullStr | Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study |
title_full_unstemmed | Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study |
title_short | Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study |
title_sort | neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: a longitudinal study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2015.02.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andreouchristina neurocognitivedeficitsarerelevantforthejumpingtoconclusionsbiasbutnotfordelusionsalongitudinalstudy AT schneiderbrookec neurocognitivedeficitsarerelevantforthejumpingtoconclusionsbiasbutnotfordelusionsalongitudinalstudy AT balzanryan neurocognitivedeficitsarerelevantforthejumpingtoconclusionsbiasbutnotfordelusionsalongitudinalstudy AT luedeckedaniel neurocognitivedeficitsarerelevantforthejumpingtoconclusionsbiasbutnotfordelusionsalongitudinalstudy AT roeschelydaniela neurocognitivedeficitsarerelevantforthejumpingtoconclusionsbiasbutnotfordelusionsalongitudinalstudy AT moritzsteffen neurocognitivedeficitsarerelevantforthejumpingtoconclusionsbiasbutnotfordelusionsalongitudinalstudy |