Cargando…

Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study

Patients with delusions exhibit an increased tendency to arrive at decisions based on very limited evidence (jumping-to-conclusions; JTC), making this reasoning bias relevant for the treatment of delusions. Neurocognitive deficits contribute to JTC, but it is not known whether this has any bearing o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andreou, Christina, Schneider, Brooke C., Balzan, Ryan, Luedecke, Daniel, Roesch-Ely, Daniela, Moritz, Steffen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2015.02.001
_version_ 1783294505793880064
author Andreou, Christina
Schneider, Brooke C.
Balzan, Ryan
Luedecke, Daniel
Roesch-Ely, Daniela
Moritz, Steffen
author_facet Andreou, Christina
Schneider, Brooke C.
Balzan, Ryan
Luedecke, Daniel
Roesch-Ely, Daniela
Moritz, Steffen
author_sort Andreou, Christina
collection PubMed
description Patients with delusions exhibit an increased tendency to arrive at decisions based on very limited evidence (jumping-to-conclusions; JTC), making this reasoning bias relevant for the treatment of delusions. Neurocognitive deficits contribute to JTC, but it is not known whether this has any bearing on the clinical syndrome of delusions. We addressed this question by reanalyzing data from an efficacy study of non-pharmacological interventions as adjunctive treatments in schizophrenia. We investigated the longitudinal associations of cognitive functioning, JTC and delusions in patients with psychotic disorders receiving either a metacognitive intervention addressing reasoning biases (n = 59), or cognitive remediation (n = 58). Both interventions improved JTC; in the cognitive remediation group, tentative evidence suggested that better neurocognitive performance contributed to this improvement. However, JTC gains were associated with delusion improvement only in the metacognitive intervention group, suggesting a content-specific mechanism of action.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5779293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57792932018-01-29 Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study Andreou, Christina Schneider, Brooke C. Balzan, Ryan Luedecke, Daniel Roesch-Ely, Daniela Moritz, Steffen Schizophr Res Cogn Article Patients with delusions exhibit an increased tendency to arrive at decisions based on very limited evidence (jumping-to-conclusions; JTC), making this reasoning bias relevant for the treatment of delusions. Neurocognitive deficits contribute to JTC, but it is not known whether this has any bearing on the clinical syndrome of delusions. We addressed this question by reanalyzing data from an efficacy study of non-pharmacological interventions as adjunctive treatments in schizophrenia. We investigated the longitudinal associations of cognitive functioning, JTC and delusions in patients with psychotic disorders receiving either a metacognitive intervention addressing reasoning biases (n = 59), or cognitive remediation (n = 58). Both interventions improved JTC; in the cognitive remediation group, tentative evidence suggested that better neurocognitive performance contributed to this improvement. However, JTC gains were associated with delusion improvement only in the metacognitive intervention group, suggesting a content-specific mechanism of action. Elsevier 2015-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5779293/ /pubmed/29379755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2015.02.001 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Andreou, Christina
Schneider, Brooke C.
Balzan, Ryan
Luedecke, Daniel
Roesch-Ely, Daniela
Moritz, Steffen
Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study
title Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study
title_full Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study
title_fullStr Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study
title_full_unstemmed Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study
title_short Neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: A longitudinal study
title_sort neurocognitive deficits are relevant for the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not for delusions: a longitudinal study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2015.02.001
work_keys_str_mv AT andreouchristina neurocognitivedeficitsarerelevantforthejumpingtoconclusionsbiasbutnotfordelusionsalongitudinalstudy
AT schneiderbrookec neurocognitivedeficitsarerelevantforthejumpingtoconclusionsbiasbutnotfordelusionsalongitudinalstudy
AT balzanryan neurocognitivedeficitsarerelevantforthejumpingtoconclusionsbiasbutnotfordelusionsalongitudinalstudy
AT luedeckedaniel neurocognitivedeficitsarerelevantforthejumpingtoconclusionsbiasbutnotfordelusionsalongitudinalstudy
AT roeschelydaniela neurocognitivedeficitsarerelevantforthejumpingtoconclusionsbiasbutnotfordelusionsalongitudinalstudy
AT moritzsteffen neurocognitivedeficitsarerelevantforthejumpingtoconclusionsbiasbutnotfordelusionsalongitudinalstudy