Cargando…

Neighbourhood disadvantage, geographic remoteness and body mass index among immigrants to Australia: A national cohort study 2006-2014

Obesity is socioeconomically, geographically and ethnically patterned. Understanding these elements of disadvantage is vital in understanding population obesity trends and the development of effective and equitable interventions. This study examined the relationship between neighbourhood socioeconom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menigoz, Karen, Nathan, Andrea, Heesch, Kristiann C., Turrell, Gavin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29360878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191729
_version_ 1783294588022161408
author Menigoz, Karen
Nathan, Andrea
Heesch, Kristiann C.
Turrell, Gavin
author_facet Menigoz, Karen
Nathan, Andrea
Heesch, Kristiann C.
Turrell, Gavin
author_sort Menigoz, Karen
collection PubMed
description Obesity is socioeconomically, geographically and ethnically patterned. Understanding these elements of disadvantage is vital in understanding population obesity trends and the development of effective and equitable interventions. This study examined the relationship between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and geographic remoteness with prospective trends in mean body mass index (BMI) among immigrants to Australia. Longitudinal data (2006–2014) from a national panel survey of Australian adults was divided into an immigrant-only sample (n = 4,293, 52.6% women and 19,404 person-year observations). The data were analysed using multi-level random effects linear regression modelling that controlled for individual socioeconomic and demographic factors. Male immigrants living in the most disadvantaged neighbourhoods had significantly higher mean BMI compared with those living in the least disadvantaged. Over time, mean BMI increased for all groups except for men living in the least disadvantaged neighbourhoods, for whom mean BMI remained almost static (0.1 kg/m(2) increase from 2006 to 2014), effectively widening neighbourhood inequalities. Among women, mean BMI was also significantly higher in the most compared with the least, disadvantaged neighbourhoods (β = 2.08 kg/m(2); 95%CI: 1.48, 2.68). Neighbourhood inequalities were maintained over time as mean BMI increased for all groups at a similar rate. Male and female immigrants residing in outer regional areas had significantly higher mean BMI compared with those living in major cities; however, differences were attenuated and no longer significant following adjustment for ethnicity, individual socioeconomic position and neighbourhood disadvantage. Over time, mean BMI increased in all male and female groups with no differences based on geographic remoteness. Obesity prevention policy targeted at immigrant cohorts needs to include area-level interventions that address inequalities in BMI arising from neighbourhood disadvantage, and be inclusive of immigrants living outside Australia’s major cities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5779685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57796852018-02-08 Neighbourhood disadvantage, geographic remoteness and body mass index among immigrants to Australia: A national cohort study 2006-2014 Menigoz, Karen Nathan, Andrea Heesch, Kristiann C. Turrell, Gavin PLoS One Research Article Obesity is socioeconomically, geographically and ethnically patterned. Understanding these elements of disadvantage is vital in understanding population obesity trends and the development of effective and equitable interventions. This study examined the relationship between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and geographic remoteness with prospective trends in mean body mass index (BMI) among immigrants to Australia. Longitudinal data (2006–2014) from a national panel survey of Australian adults was divided into an immigrant-only sample (n = 4,293, 52.6% women and 19,404 person-year observations). The data were analysed using multi-level random effects linear regression modelling that controlled for individual socioeconomic and demographic factors. Male immigrants living in the most disadvantaged neighbourhoods had significantly higher mean BMI compared with those living in the least disadvantaged. Over time, mean BMI increased for all groups except for men living in the least disadvantaged neighbourhoods, for whom mean BMI remained almost static (0.1 kg/m(2) increase from 2006 to 2014), effectively widening neighbourhood inequalities. Among women, mean BMI was also significantly higher in the most compared with the least, disadvantaged neighbourhoods (β = 2.08 kg/m(2); 95%CI: 1.48, 2.68). Neighbourhood inequalities were maintained over time as mean BMI increased for all groups at a similar rate. Male and female immigrants residing in outer regional areas had significantly higher mean BMI compared with those living in major cities; however, differences were attenuated and no longer significant following adjustment for ethnicity, individual socioeconomic position and neighbourhood disadvantage. Over time, mean BMI increased in all male and female groups with no differences based on geographic remoteness. Obesity prevention policy targeted at immigrant cohorts needs to include area-level interventions that address inequalities in BMI arising from neighbourhood disadvantage, and be inclusive of immigrants living outside Australia’s major cities. Public Library of Science 2018-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5779685/ /pubmed/29360878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191729 Text en © 2018 Menigoz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Menigoz, Karen
Nathan, Andrea
Heesch, Kristiann C.
Turrell, Gavin
Neighbourhood disadvantage, geographic remoteness and body mass index among immigrants to Australia: A national cohort study 2006-2014
title Neighbourhood disadvantage, geographic remoteness and body mass index among immigrants to Australia: A national cohort study 2006-2014
title_full Neighbourhood disadvantage, geographic remoteness and body mass index among immigrants to Australia: A national cohort study 2006-2014
title_fullStr Neighbourhood disadvantage, geographic remoteness and body mass index among immigrants to Australia: A national cohort study 2006-2014
title_full_unstemmed Neighbourhood disadvantage, geographic remoteness and body mass index among immigrants to Australia: A national cohort study 2006-2014
title_short Neighbourhood disadvantage, geographic remoteness and body mass index among immigrants to Australia: A national cohort study 2006-2014
title_sort neighbourhood disadvantage, geographic remoteness and body mass index among immigrants to australia: a national cohort study 2006-2014
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29360878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191729
work_keys_str_mv AT menigozkaren neighbourhooddisadvantagegeographicremotenessandbodymassindexamongimmigrantstoaustraliaanationalcohortstudy20062014
AT nathanandrea neighbourhooddisadvantagegeographicremotenessandbodymassindexamongimmigrantstoaustraliaanationalcohortstudy20062014
AT heeschkristiannc neighbourhooddisadvantagegeographicremotenessandbodymassindexamongimmigrantstoaustraliaanationalcohortstudy20062014
AT turrellgavin neighbourhooddisadvantagegeographicremotenessandbodymassindexamongimmigrantstoaustraliaanationalcohortstudy20062014