Cargando…

Analysis of strain and regional variation in gene expression in mouse brain

BACKGROUND: We performed a statistical analysis of a previously published set of gene expression microarray data from six different brain regions in two mouse strains. In the previous analysis, 24 genes showing expression differences between the strains and about 240 genes with regional differences...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavlidis, Paul, Noble, William S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC57797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11597334
_version_ 1782120051662389248
author Pavlidis, Paul
Noble, William S
author_facet Pavlidis, Paul
Noble, William S
author_sort Pavlidis, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We performed a statistical analysis of a previously published set of gene expression microarray data from six different brain regions in two mouse strains. In the previous analysis, 24 genes showing expression differences between the strains and about 240 genes with regional differences in expression were identified. Like many gene expression studies, that analysis relied primarily on ad hoc 'fold change' and 'absent/present' criteria to select genes. To determine whether statistically motivated methods would give a more sensitive and selective analysis of gene expression patterns in the brain, we decided to use analysis of variance (ANOVA) and feature selection methods designed to select genes showing strain- or region-dependent patterns of expression. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed many additional genes that might be involved in behavioral differences between the two mouse strains and functional differences between the six brain regions. Using conservative statistical criteria, we identified at least 63 genes showing strain variation and approximately 600 genes showing regional variation. Unlike ad hoc methods, ours have the additional benefit of ranking the genes by statistical score, permitting further analysis to focus on the most significant. Comparison of our results to the previous studies and to published reports on individual genes show that we achieved high sensitivity while preserving selectivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that molecular differences between the strains and regions studied are larger than indicated previously. We conclude that for large complex datasets, ANOVA and feature selection, alone or in combination, are more powerful than methods based on fold-change thresholds and other ad hoc selection criteria.
format Text
id pubmed-57797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-577972001-10-11 Analysis of strain and regional variation in gene expression in mouse brain Pavlidis, Paul Noble, William S Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: We performed a statistical analysis of a previously published set of gene expression microarray data from six different brain regions in two mouse strains. In the previous analysis, 24 genes showing expression differences between the strains and about 240 genes with regional differences in expression were identified. Like many gene expression studies, that analysis relied primarily on ad hoc 'fold change' and 'absent/present' criteria to select genes. To determine whether statistically motivated methods would give a more sensitive and selective analysis of gene expression patterns in the brain, we decided to use analysis of variance (ANOVA) and feature selection methods designed to select genes showing strain- or region-dependent patterns of expression. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed many additional genes that might be involved in behavioral differences between the two mouse strains and functional differences between the six brain regions. Using conservative statistical criteria, we identified at least 63 genes showing strain variation and approximately 600 genes showing regional variation. Unlike ad hoc methods, ours have the additional benefit of ranking the genes by statistical score, permitting further analysis to focus on the most significant. Comparison of our results to the previous studies and to published reports on individual genes show that we achieved high sensitivity while preserving selectivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that molecular differences between the strains and regions studied are larger than indicated previously. We conclude that for large complex datasets, ANOVA and feature selection, alone or in combination, are more powerful than methods based on fold-change thresholds and other ad hoc selection criteria. BioMed Central 2001 2001-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC57797/ /pubmed/11597334 Text en Copyright © 2001 Pavlidis and Noble, licensee BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Research
Pavlidis, Paul
Noble, William S
Analysis of strain and regional variation in gene expression in mouse brain
title Analysis of strain and regional variation in gene expression in mouse brain
title_full Analysis of strain and regional variation in gene expression in mouse brain
title_fullStr Analysis of strain and regional variation in gene expression in mouse brain
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of strain and regional variation in gene expression in mouse brain
title_short Analysis of strain and regional variation in gene expression in mouse brain
title_sort analysis of strain and regional variation in gene expression in mouse brain
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC57797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11597334
work_keys_str_mv AT pavlidispaul analysisofstrainandregionalvariationingeneexpressioninmousebrain
AT noblewilliams analysisofstrainandregionalvariationingeneexpressioninmousebrain