Cargando…

Comparison between direct contact and extract exposure methods for PFO cytotoxicity evaluation

A series of recent acute blindness cases following non–complicated retinal detachment surgery caused the release of several health alerts in Spain. The blindness was attributed to certain lots of perfluoro-octane (PFO; a volatile and transient medical device). Similar cases have been reported in oth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srivastava, Girish K., Alonso-Alonso, Maria L., Fernandez-Bueno, Ivan, Garcia-Gutierrez, Maria T., Rull, Fernando, Medina, Jesús, Coco, Rosa M., Pastor, J. Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5780508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29362382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19428-5
_version_ 1783294755014180864
author Srivastava, Girish K.
Alonso-Alonso, Maria L.
Fernandez-Bueno, Ivan
Garcia-Gutierrez, Maria T.
Rull, Fernando
Medina, Jesús
Coco, Rosa M.
Pastor, J. Carlos
author_facet Srivastava, Girish K.
Alonso-Alonso, Maria L.
Fernandez-Bueno, Ivan
Garcia-Gutierrez, Maria T.
Rull, Fernando
Medina, Jesús
Coco, Rosa M.
Pastor, J. Carlos
author_sort Srivastava, Girish K.
collection PubMed
description A series of recent acute blindness cases following non–complicated retinal detachment surgery caused the release of several health alerts in Spain. The blindness was attributed to certain lots of perfluoro-octane (PFO; a volatile and transient medical device). Similar cases have been reported in other countries. This has raised questions regarding the validity of cytotoxicity test methods currently used to certify the safety of PFO lots. The tests were performed according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) norms, using the extract dilution method or the indirect contact method as applied to L929 cells, a line derived from mouse fibroblasts. The limitations of those methods have been resolved in this study by proposing a new cytotoxicity test method for volatile substances. The new method requires direct contact of the tested substance with cells that are similar to those exposed to the substance in the clinical setting. This approach includes a few new technical steps that are crucial for detecting cytotoxicity. Our new method detected toxic PFO lots that corresponded to the lots producing clinical blindness, which previous methods failed to detect. The study suggests applying this new method to avoid occurrence of such cases of blindness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5780508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57805082018-02-06 Comparison between direct contact and extract exposure methods for PFO cytotoxicity evaluation Srivastava, Girish K. Alonso-Alonso, Maria L. Fernandez-Bueno, Ivan Garcia-Gutierrez, Maria T. Rull, Fernando Medina, Jesús Coco, Rosa M. Pastor, J. Carlos Sci Rep Article A series of recent acute blindness cases following non–complicated retinal detachment surgery caused the release of several health alerts in Spain. The blindness was attributed to certain lots of perfluoro-octane (PFO; a volatile and transient medical device). Similar cases have been reported in other countries. This has raised questions regarding the validity of cytotoxicity test methods currently used to certify the safety of PFO lots. The tests were performed according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) norms, using the extract dilution method or the indirect contact method as applied to L929 cells, a line derived from mouse fibroblasts. The limitations of those methods have been resolved in this study by proposing a new cytotoxicity test method for volatile substances. The new method requires direct contact of the tested substance with cells that are similar to those exposed to the substance in the clinical setting. This approach includes a few new technical steps that are crucial for detecting cytotoxicity. Our new method detected toxic PFO lots that corresponded to the lots producing clinical blindness, which previous methods failed to detect. The study suggests applying this new method to avoid occurrence of such cases of blindness. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5780508/ /pubmed/29362382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19428-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Srivastava, Girish K.
Alonso-Alonso, Maria L.
Fernandez-Bueno, Ivan
Garcia-Gutierrez, Maria T.
Rull, Fernando
Medina, Jesús
Coco, Rosa M.
Pastor, J. Carlos
Comparison between direct contact and extract exposure methods for PFO cytotoxicity evaluation
title Comparison between direct contact and extract exposure methods for PFO cytotoxicity evaluation
title_full Comparison between direct contact and extract exposure methods for PFO cytotoxicity evaluation
title_fullStr Comparison between direct contact and extract exposure methods for PFO cytotoxicity evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between direct contact and extract exposure methods for PFO cytotoxicity evaluation
title_short Comparison between direct contact and extract exposure methods for PFO cytotoxicity evaluation
title_sort comparison between direct contact and extract exposure methods for pfo cytotoxicity evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5780508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29362382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19428-5
work_keys_str_mv AT srivastavagirishk comparisonbetweendirectcontactandextractexposuremethodsforpfocytotoxicityevaluation
AT alonsoalonsomarial comparisonbetweendirectcontactandextractexposuremethodsforpfocytotoxicityevaluation
AT fernandezbuenoivan comparisonbetweendirectcontactandextractexposuremethodsforpfocytotoxicityevaluation
AT garciagutierrezmariat comparisonbetweendirectcontactandextractexposuremethodsforpfocytotoxicityevaluation
AT rullfernando comparisonbetweendirectcontactandextractexposuremethodsforpfocytotoxicityevaluation
AT medinajesus comparisonbetweendirectcontactandextractexposuremethodsforpfocytotoxicityevaluation
AT cocorosam comparisonbetweendirectcontactandextractexposuremethodsforpfocytotoxicityevaluation
AT pastorjcarlos comparisonbetweendirectcontactandextractexposuremethodsforpfocytotoxicityevaluation