Cargando…

Comparison of corifollitropin alfa and daily recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of corifollitropin alfa (CFA) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) in poor-responder patients undergoing antagonist cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of the treatment results of 214 poor res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akarsu, Süleyman, Demir, Sibel, Gode, Funda, Işık, Ahmet Zeki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5780561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379660
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.08634
_version_ 1783294766933344256
author Akarsu, Süleyman
Demir, Sibel
Gode, Funda
Işık, Ahmet Zeki
author_facet Akarsu, Süleyman
Demir, Sibel
Gode, Funda
Işık, Ahmet Zeki
author_sort Akarsu, Süleyman
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of corifollitropin alfa (CFA) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) in poor-responder patients undergoing antagonist cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of the treatment results of 214 poor responder patients who had been admitted to the In Vitro Fertilization Unit of İzmir Medical Park Hospital between November 2014 and November 2016. Intracytoplasmic sperm injections were performed in 38 patients (group 1) with CFA, and the remaining 176 (group 2) with rFSH for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. RESULTS: The age, body mass index, anti-müllerian hormone level, duration of infertility, duration of induction and antral follicle number were similar in the two groups. There was no difference in the total aspirated oocyte counts, mature oocyte ratio, fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rates between the two groups. The implantation rate was 9/38 (23.6%) in group 1 and 42/176 (23.8%) in group 2, whereas the clinical pregnancy rates were 16.3% and 17.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: No difference was found in terms of oocyte count, fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rates of CFA or rFSH use in the antagonist cycles in poor-responder patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5780561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57805612018-01-29 Comparison of corifollitropin alfa and daily recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles Akarsu, Süleyman Demir, Sibel Gode, Funda Işık, Ahmet Zeki Turk J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Investigation OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of corifollitropin alfa (CFA) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) in poor-responder patients undergoing antagonist cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of the treatment results of 214 poor responder patients who had been admitted to the In Vitro Fertilization Unit of İzmir Medical Park Hospital between November 2014 and November 2016. Intracytoplasmic sperm injections were performed in 38 patients (group 1) with CFA, and the remaining 176 (group 2) with rFSH for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. RESULTS: The age, body mass index, anti-müllerian hormone level, duration of infertility, duration of induction and antral follicle number were similar in the two groups. There was no difference in the total aspirated oocyte counts, mature oocyte ratio, fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rates between the two groups. The implantation rate was 9/38 (23.6%) in group 1 and 42/176 (23.8%) in group 2, whereas the clinical pregnancy rates were 16.3% and 17.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: No difference was found in terms of oocyte count, fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rates of CFA or rFSH use in the antagonist cycles in poor-responder patients. Galenos Publishing 2017-12 2017-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5780561/ /pubmed/29379660 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.08634 Text en ©Copyright 2017 by Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing House. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Akarsu, Süleyman
Demir, Sibel
Gode, Funda
Işık, Ahmet Zeki
Comparison of corifollitropin alfa and daily recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles
title Comparison of corifollitropin alfa and daily recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles
title_full Comparison of corifollitropin alfa and daily recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles
title_fullStr Comparison of corifollitropin alfa and daily recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of corifollitropin alfa and daily recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles
title_short Comparison of corifollitropin alfa and daily recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles
title_sort comparison of corifollitropin alfa and daily recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5780561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379660
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.08634
work_keys_str_mv AT akarsusuleyman comparisonofcorifollitropinalfaanddailyrecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpoorresponderpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationcycles
AT demirsibel comparisonofcorifollitropinalfaanddailyrecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpoorresponderpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationcycles
AT godefunda comparisonofcorifollitropinalfaanddailyrecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpoorresponderpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationcycles
AT isıkahmetzeki comparisonofcorifollitropinalfaanddailyrecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpoorresponderpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationcycles