Cargando…

Quality of family relationships and outcomes of dementia: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between the quality of relationship between a person with dementia and their family carer and outcomes for the person with dementia. DESIGN: Systematic review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Cohort studies of people with clinically diagnosed dementia and their main car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edwards, Hannah B, Ijaz, Sharea, Whiting, Penny F, Leach, Verity, Richards, Alison, Cullum, Sarah J, Cheston, Richard IL, Savović, Jelena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5780722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29358414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015538
_version_ 1783294794575904768
author Edwards, Hannah B
Ijaz, Sharea
Whiting, Penny F
Leach, Verity
Richards, Alison
Cullum, Sarah J
Cheston, Richard IL
Savović, Jelena
author_facet Edwards, Hannah B
Ijaz, Sharea
Whiting, Penny F
Leach, Verity
Richards, Alison
Cullum, Sarah J
Cheston, Richard IL
Savović, Jelena
author_sort Edwards, Hannah B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between the quality of relationship between a person with dementia and their family carer and outcomes for the person with dementia. DESIGN: Systematic review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Cohort studies of people with clinically diagnosed dementia and their main carers. Exposures of interest were any elements of relationship quality, for example, attachment style, expressed emotion and coping style. Our primary outcome was institutionalisation, and secondary outcomes were hospitalisation, death, quality of life and behavioural and psychiatric symptoms of dementia (‘challenging behaviour’). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library and Opengrey were searched from inception to May 2017. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias. A narrative synthesis of results was performed due to differences between studies. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included. None of the studies controlled for all prespecified confounding factors (age, gender, socioeconomic status and severity of dementia). Reporting of results was inadequate with many studies simply reporting whether associations were ‘statistically significant’ without providing effect size estimates or CIs. There was a suggestion of an association between relationship factors and global challenging behaviour. All studies evaluating global challenging behaviour provided statistical evidence of an association (most P values below 0.02). There was no consistent evidence for an association for any other outcome assessed. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no strong or consistent evidence on the effects of relationship factors on institutionalisation, hospitalisation, death or quality of life for people with dementia. There was a suggestion of an association between relationship factors and challenging behaviour, although the evidence for this was weak. To improve our ability to support those with dementia and their families, further robust studies are needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015020518.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5780722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57807222018-01-31 Quality of family relationships and outcomes of dementia: a systematic review Edwards, Hannah B Ijaz, Sharea Whiting, Penny F Leach, Verity Richards, Alison Cullum, Sarah J Cheston, Richard IL Savović, Jelena BMJ Open Neurology OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between the quality of relationship between a person with dementia and their family carer and outcomes for the person with dementia. DESIGN: Systematic review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Cohort studies of people with clinically diagnosed dementia and their main carers. Exposures of interest were any elements of relationship quality, for example, attachment style, expressed emotion and coping style. Our primary outcome was institutionalisation, and secondary outcomes were hospitalisation, death, quality of life and behavioural and psychiatric symptoms of dementia (‘challenging behaviour’). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library and Opengrey were searched from inception to May 2017. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias. A narrative synthesis of results was performed due to differences between studies. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included. None of the studies controlled for all prespecified confounding factors (age, gender, socioeconomic status and severity of dementia). Reporting of results was inadequate with many studies simply reporting whether associations were ‘statistically significant’ without providing effect size estimates or CIs. There was a suggestion of an association between relationship factors and global challenging behaviour. All studies evaluating global challenging behaviour provided statistical evidence of an association (most P values below 0.02). There was no consistent evidence for an association for any other outcome assessed. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no strong or consistent evidence on the effects of relationship factors on institutionalisation, hospitalisation, death or quality of life for people with dementia. There was a suggestion of an association between relationship factors and challenging behaviour, although the evidence for this was weak. To improve our ability to support those with dementia and their families, further robust studies are needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015020518. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5780722/ /pubmed/29358414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015538 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Neurology
Edwards, Hannah B
Ijaz, Sharea
Whiting, Penny F
Leach, Verity
Richards, Alison
Cullum, Sarah J
Cheston, Richard IL
Savović, Jelena
Quality of family relationships and outcomes of dementia: a systematic review
title Quality of family relationships and outcomes of dementia: a systematic review
title_full Quality of family relationships and outcomes of dementia: a systematic review
title_fullStr Quality of family relationships and outcomes of dementia: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Quality of family relationships and outcomes of dementia: a systematic review
title_short Quality of family relationships and outcomes of dementia: a systematic review
title_sort quality of family relationships and outcomes of dementia: a systematic review
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5780722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29358414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015538
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardshannahb qualityoffamilyrelationshipsandoutcomesofdementiaasystematicreview
AT ijazsharea qualityoffamilyrelationshipsandoutcomesofdementiaasystematicreview
AT whitingpennyf qualityoffamilyrelationshipsandoutcomesofdementiaasystematicreview
AT leachverity qualityoffamilyrelationshipsandoutcomesofdementiaasystematicreview
AT richardsalison qualityoffamilyrelationshipsandoutcomesofdementiaasystematicreview
AT cullumsarahj qualityoffamilyrelationshipsandoutcomesofdementiaasystematicreview
AT chestonrichardil qualityoffamilyrelationshipsandoutcomesofdementiaasystematicreview
AT savovicjelena qualityoffamilyrelationshipsandoutcomesofdementiaasystematicreview