Cargando…
Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort
OBJECTIVES: To estimate cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to identify their determinants, in two Portuguese regions. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients consecutively admitted to the cardiology departmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29301762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018934 |
_version_ | 1783294868309671936 |
---|---|
author | Viana, Marta Borges, Andreia Araújo, Carla Rocha, Afonso Ribeiro, Ana I Laszczyńska, Olga Dias, Paula Maciel, Maria J Moreira, Ilídio Lunet, Nuno Azevedo, Ana |
author_facet | Viana, Marta Borges, Andreia Araújo, Carla Rocha, Afonso Ribeiro, Ana I Laszczyńska, Olga Dias, Paula Maciel, Maria J Moreira, Ilídio Lunet, Nuno Azevedo, Ana |
author_sort | Viana, Marta |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To estimate cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to identify their determinants, in two Portuguese regions. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of two hospitals, one in the district of Porto and one in the north-east region (NER) of Portugal, were enrolled in the EPIHeart cohort and then followed up for 6 months. PARTICIPANTS: Between August 2013 and December 2014, 939 patients were included in the cohort, and 853 were re-evaluated at 6-month follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Referral rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who were referred to a CR programme, whereas participation rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who completed a CR programme, as was recommended by their physicians. RESULTS: Patients referred were 32.3% and 10.7% of those eligible in Porto and NER, respectively. In both regions, referral to CR decreased with age and with longer travel times to CR centres and increased with education or social class. At follow-up, 128 patients from Porto (26.2% of those eligible and 81.0% of those referred) and 26 from NER (7.1% of those eligible and 66.7% of those referred) reported actually participating in a CR programme. In Porto, the main barriers to participation were the long time until a programme was available and lack of perceived benefit. Patients in NER identified distance to CR and costs as the main barriers. CONCLUSIONS: CR remains clearly underused in Portugal, with major inequalities in access between regions. Achieving equitable and greater use of CR requires a multilevel approach addressing barriers related to healthcare system, providers and patients in order to improve provision, referral and participation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5781051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57810512018-01-31 Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort Viana, Marta Borges, Andreia Araújo, Carla Rocha, Afonso Ribeiro, Ana I Laszczyńska, Olga Dias, Paula Maciel, Maria J Moreira, Ilídio Lunet, Nuno Azevedo, Ana BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: To estimate cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to identify their determinants, in two Portuguese regions. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of two hospitals, one in the district of Porto and one in the north-east region (NER) of Portugal, were enrolled in the EPIHeart cohort and then followed up for 6 months. PARTICIPANTS: Between August 2013 and December 2014, 939 patients were included in the cohort, and 853 were re-evaluated at 6-month follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Referral rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who were referred to a CR programme, whereas participation rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who completed a CR programme, as was recommended by their physicians. RESULTS: Patients referred were 32.3% and 10.7% of those eligible in Porto and NER, respectively. In both regions, referral to CR decreased with age and with longer travel times to CR centres and increased with education or social class. At follow-up, 128 patients from Porto (26.2% of those eligible and 81.0% of those referred) and 26 from NER (7.1% of those eligible and 66.7% of those referred) reported actually participating in a CR programme. In Porto, the main barriers to participation were the long time until a programme was available and lack of perceived benefit. Patients in NER identified distance to CR and costs as the main barriers. CONCLUSIONS: CR remains clearly underused in Portugal, with major inequalities in access between regions. Achieving equitable and greater use of CR requires a multilevel approach addressing barriers related to healthcare system, providers and patients in order to improve provision, referral and participation. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5781051/ /pubmed/29301762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018934 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Viana, Marta Borges, Andreia Araújo, Carla Rocha, Afonso Ribeiro, Ana I Laszczyńska, Olga Dias, Paula Maciel, Maria J Moreira, Ilídio Lunet, Nuno Azevedo, Ana Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort |
title | Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort |
title_full | Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort |
title_fullStr | Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort |
title_short | Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort |
title_sort | inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the epiheart cohort |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29301762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018934 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vianamarta inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort AT borgesandreia inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort AT araujocarla inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort AT rochaafonso inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort AT ribeiroanai inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort AT laszczynskaolga inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort AT diaspaula inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort AT macielmariaj inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort AT moreirailidio inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort AT lunetnuno inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort AT azevedoana inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort |