Cargando…

Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort

OBJECTIVES: To estimate cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to identify their determinants, in two Portuguese regions. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients consecutively admitted to the cardiology departmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viana, Marta, Borges, Andreia, Araújo, Carla, Rocha, Afonso, Ribeiro, Ana I, Laszczyńska, Olga, Dias, Paula, Maciel, Maria J, Moreira, Ilídio, Lunet, Nuno, Azevedo, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29301762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018934
_version_ 1783294868309671936
author Viana, Marta
Borges, Andreia
Araújo, Carla
Rocha, Afonso
Ribeiro, Ana I
Laszczyńska, Olga
Dias, Paula
Maciel, Maria J
Moreira, Ilídio
Lunet, Nuno
Azevedo, Ana
author_facet Viana, Marta
Borges, Andreia
Araújo, Carla
Rocha, Afonso
Ribeiro, Ana I
Laszczyńska, Olga
Dias, Paula
Maciel, Maria J
Moreira, Ilídio
Lunet, Nuno
Azevedo, Ana
author_sort Viana, Marta
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To estimate cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to identify their determinants, in two Portuguese regions. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of two hospitals, one in the district of Porto and one in the north-east region (NER) of Portugal, were enrolled in the EPIHeart cohort and then followed up for 6 months. PARTICIPANTS: Between August 2013 and December 2014, 939 patients were included in the cohort, and 853 were re-evaluated at 6-month follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Referral rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who were referred to a CR programme, whereas participation rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who completed a CR programme, as was recommended by their physicians. RESULTS: Patients referred were 32.3% and 10.7% of those eligible in Porto and NER, respectively. In both regions, referral to CR decreased with age and with longer travel times to CR centres and increased with education or social class. At follow-up, 128 patients from Porto (26.2% of those eligible and 81.0% of those referred) and 26 from NER (7.1% of those eligible and 66.7% of those referred) reported actually participating in a CR programme. In Porto, the main barriers to participation were the long time until a programme was available and lack of perceived benefit. Patients in NER identified distance to CR and costs as the main barriers. CONCLUSIONS: CR remains clearly underused in Portugal, with major inequalities in access between regions. Achieving equitable and greater use of CR requires a multilevel approach addressing barriers related to healthcare system, providers and patients in order to improve provision, referral and participation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5781051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57810512018-01-31 Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort Viana, Marta Borges, Andreia Araújo, Carla Rocha, Afonso Ribeiro, Ana I Laszczyńska, Olga Dias, Paula Maciel, Maria J Moreira, Ilídio Lunet, Nuno Azevedo, Ana BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: To estimate cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to identify their determinants, in two Portuguese regions. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of two hospitals, one in the district of Porto and one in the north-east region (NER) of Portugal, were enrolled in the EPIHeart cohort and then followed up for 6 months. PARTICIPANTS: Between August 2013 and December 2014, 939 patients were included in the cohort, and 853 were re-evaluated at 6-month follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Referral rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who were referred to a CR programme, whereas participation rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who completed a CR programme, as was recommended by their physicians. RESULTS: Patients referred were 32.3% and 10.7% of those eligible in Porto and NER, respectively. In both regions, referral to CR decreased with age and with longer travel times to CR centres and increased with education or social class. At follow-up, 128 patients from Porto (26.2% of those eligible and 81.0% of those referred) and 26 from NER (7.1% of those eligible and 66.7% of those referred) reported actually participating in a CR programme. In Porto, the main barriers to participation were the long time until a programme was available and lack of perceived benefit. Patients in NER identified distance to CR and costs as the main barriers. CONCLUSIONS: CR remains clearly underused in Portugal, with major inequalities in access between regions. Achieving equitable and greater use of CR requires a multilevel approach addressing barriers related to healthcare system, providers and patients in order to improve provision, referral and participation. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5781051/ /pubmed/29301762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018934 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Viana, Marta
Borges, Andreia
Araújo, Carla
Rocha, Afonso
Ribeiro, Ana I
Laszczyńska, Olga
Dias, Paula
Maciel, Maria J
Moreira, Ilídio
Lunet, Nuno
Azevedo, Ana
Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort
title Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort
title_full Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort
title_fullStr Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort
title_full_unstemmed Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort
title_short Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort
title_sort inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the epiheart cohort
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29301762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018934
work_keys_str_mv AT vianamarta inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort
AT borgesandreia inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort
AT araujocarla inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort
AT rochaafonso inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort
AT ribeiroanai inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort
AT laszczynskaolga inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort
AT diaspaula inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort
AT macielmariaj inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort
AT moreirailidio inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort
AT lunetnuno inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort
AT azevedoana inequalitiesinaccesstocardiacrehabilitationafteranacutecoronarysyndrometheepiheartcohort