Cargando…

Income and obesity: what is the direction of the relationship? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: It was repeatedly shown that lower income is associated with higher risks for subsequent obesity. However, the perspective of a potential reverse causality is often neglected, in which obesity is considered a cause for lower income, when obese people drift into lower-income jobs due to la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Tae Jun, von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29306894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019862
_version_ 1783294868840251392
author Kim, Tae Jun
von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
author_facet Kim, Tae Jun
von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
author_sort Kim, Tae Jun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: It was repeatedly shown that lower income is associated with higher risks for subsequent obesity. However, the perspective of a potential reverse causality is often neglected, in which obesity is considered a cause for lower income, when obese people drift into lower-income jobs due to labour–market discrimination and public stigmatisation. This review was performed to explore the direction of the relation between income and obesity by specifically assessing the importance of social causation and reverse causality. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in January 2017. The databases Medline, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, International Bibliography of Social Sciences and Sociological Index were screened to identify prospective cohort studies with quantitative data on the relation between income and obesity. Meta-analytic methods were applied using random-effect models, and the quality of studies assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: In total, 21 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. All included studies originated from either the USA (n=16), the UK (n=3) or Canada (n=2). From these, 14 studies on causation and 7 studies on reverse causality were found. Meta-analyses revealed that lower income is associated with subsequent obesity (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.47; risk ratio 1.52, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.13), though the statistical significance vanished once adjusted for publication bias. Studies on reverse causality indicated a more consistent relation between obesity and subsequent income, even after taking publication bias into account (standardised mean difference −0.15, 95% CI −0.30 to 0.01). Sensitivity analyses implied that the association is influenced by obesity measurement, gender, length of observation and study quality. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that there is more consistent evidence for reverse causality. Therefore, there is a need to examine reverse causality processes in more detail to understand the relation between income and obesity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: 42016041296.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5781054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57810542018-01-31 Income and obesity: what is the direction of the relationship? A systematic review and meta-analysis Kim, Tae Jun von dem Knesebeck, Olaf BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: It was repeatedly shown that lower income is associated with higher risks for subsequent obesity. However, the perspective of a potential reverse causality is often neglected, in which obesity is considered a cause for lower income, when obese people drift into lower-income jobs due to labour–market discrimination and public stigmatisation. This review was performed to explore the direction of the relation between income and obesity by specifically assessing the importance of social causation and reverse causality. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in January 2017. The databases Medline, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, International Bibliography of Social Sciences and Sociological Index were screened to identify prospective cohort studies with quantitative data on the relation between income and obesity. Meta-analytic methods were applied using random-effect models, and the quality of studies assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: In total, 21 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. All included studies originated from either the USA (n=16), the UK (n=3) or Canada (n=2). From these, 14 studies on causation and 7 studies on reverse causality were found. Meta-analyses revealed that lower income is associated with subsequent obesity (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.47; risk ratio 1.52, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.13), though the statistical significance vanished once adjusted for publication bias. Studies on reverse causality indicated a more consistent relation between obesity and subsequent income, even after taking publication bias into account (standardised mean difference −0.15, 95% CI −0.30 to 0.01). Sensitivity analyses implied that the association is influenced by obesity measurement, gender, length of observation and study quality. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that there is more consistent evidence for reverse causality. Therefore, there is a need to examine reverse causality processes in more detail to understand the relation between income and obesity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: 42016041296. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5781054/ /pubmed/29306894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019862 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Kim, Tae Jun
von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
Income and obesity: what is the direction of the relationship? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Income and obesity: what is the direction of the relationship? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Income and obesity: what is the direction of the relationship? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Income and obesity: what is the direction of the relationship? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Income and obesity: what is the direction of the relationship? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Income and obesity: what is the direction of the relationship? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort income and obesity: what is the direction of the relationship? a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29306894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019862
work_keys_str_mv AT kimtaejun incomeandobesitywhatisthedirectionoftherelationshipasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vondemknesebeckolaf incomeandobesitywhatisthedirectionoftherelationshipasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis