Cargando…

A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care

INTRODUCTION: Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and subclinical GAD are highly prevalent in primary care. Unmanaged anxiety worsens quality of life in patients seen in primary care practices and leads to increased medical utilisation and costs. Programmes that teach patients cognitive–behavioural t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szigethy, Eva, Solano, Francis, Wallace, Meredith, Perry, Dina L, Morrell, Lauren, Scott, Kathryn, Bell, Megan Jones, Oser, Megan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29331971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019108
_version_ 1783294879465472000
author Szigethy, Eva
Solano, Francis
Wallace, Meredith
Perry, Dina L
Morrell, Lauren
Scott, Kathryn
Bell, Megan Jones
Oser, Megan
author_facet Szigethy, Eva
Solano, Francis
Wallace, Meredith
Perry, Dina L
Morrell, Lauren
Scott, Kathryn
Bell, Megan Jones
Oser, Megan
author_sort Szigethy, Eva
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and subclinical GAD are highly prevalent in primary care. Unmanaged anxiety worsens quality of life in patients seen in primary care practices and leads to increased medical utilisation and costs. Programmes that teach patients cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) techniques have been shown to improve anxiety and to prevent the evolution of anxiety symptoms to disorders, but access and engagement have hampered integration of CBT into medical settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This pragmatic study takes place in University of Pittsburgh Medical Center primary care practices to evaluate a coach-supported mobile cognitive– behavioural programme (Lantern) on anxiety symptoms and quality of life. Clinics were non-randomly assigned to either enhanced treatment as usual or Lantern. All clinics provide electronic screening for anxiety and, within clinics assigned to Lantern, patients meeting a threshold level of mild anxiety (ie, >5 on Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Questionnaire (GAD-7)) are referred to Lantern. The first study phase is aimed at establishing feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness. The second phase focuses on long-term impact on psychosocial outcomes, healthcare utilisation and clinic/provider adoption/sustainable implementation using a propensity score matched parallel group study design. Primary outcomes are changes in anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) and quality of life (Short-Form Health Survey) between baseline and 6-month follow-ups, comparing control and intervention. Secondary outcomes include provider and patient satisfaction, patient engagement, durability of changes in anxiety symptoms and quality of life over 12 months and the impact of Lantern on healthcare utilisation over 12 months. Patients from control sites will be matched to the patients who use the mobile app. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics and human subject research approval were obtained. A data safety monitoring board is overseeing trial data and ethics. Results will be communicated to participating primary care practices, published and presented at clinical and scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03035019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5781102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57811022018-01-31 A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care Szigethy, Eva Solano, Francis Wallace, Meredith Perry, Dina L Morrell, Lauren Scott, Kathryn Bell, Megan Jones Oser, Megan BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and subclinical GAD are highly prevalent in primary care. Unmanaged anxiety worsens quality of life in patients seen in primary care practices and leads to increased medical utilisation and costs. Programmes that teach patients cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) techniques have been shown to improve anxiety and to prevent the evolution of anxiety symptoms to disorders, but access and engagement have hampered integration of CBT into medical settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This pragmatic study takes place in University of Pittsburgh Medical Center primary care practices to evaluate a coach-supported mobile cognitive– behavioural programme (Lantern) on anxiety symptoms and quality of life. Clinics were non-randomly assigned to either enhanced treatment as usual or Lantern. All clinics provide electronic screening for anxiety and, within clinics assigned to Lantern, patients meeting a threshold level of mild anxiety (ie, >5 on Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Questionnaire (GAD-7)) are referred to Lantern. The first study phase is aimed at establishing feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness. The second phase focuses on long-term impact on psychosocial outcomes, healthcare utilisation and clinic/provider adoption/sustainable implementation using a propensity score matched parallel group study design. Primary outcomes are changes in anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) and quality of life (Short-Form Health Survey) between baseline and 6-month follow-ups, comparing control and intervention. Secondary outcomes include provider and patient satisfaction, patient engagement, durability of changes in anxiety symptoms and quality of life over 12 months and the impact of Lantern on healthcare utilisation over 12 months. Patients from control sites will be matched to the patients who use the mobile app. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics and human subject research approval were obtained. A data safety monitoring board is overseeing trial data and ethics. Results will be communicated to participating primary care practices, published and presented at clinical and scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03035019. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5781102/ /pubmed/29331971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019108 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Szigethy, Eva
Solano, Francis
Wallace, Meredith
Perry, Dina L
Morrell, Lauren
Scott, Kathryn
Bell, Megan Jones
Oser, Megan
A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care
title A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care
title_full A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care
title_fullStr A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care
title_full_unstemmed A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care
title_short A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care
title_sort study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29331971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019108
work_keys_str_mv AT szigethyeva astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT solanofrancis astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT wallacemeredith astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT perrydinal astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT morrelllauren astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT scottkathryn astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT bellmeganjones astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT osermegan astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT szigethyeva studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT solanofrancis studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT wallacemeredith studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT perrydinal studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT morrelllauren studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT scottkathryn studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT bellmeganjones studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare
AT osermegan studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare