Cargando…
A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care
INTRODUCTION: Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and subclinical GAD are highly prevalent in primary care. Unmanaged anxiety worsens quality of life in patients seen in primary care practices and leads to increased medical utilisation and costs. Programmes that teach patients cognitive–behavioural t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29331971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019108 |
_version_ | 1783294879465472000 |
---|---|
author | Szigethy, Eva Solano, Francis Wallace, Meredith Perry, Dina L Morrell, Lauren Scott, Kathryn Bell, Megan Jones Oser, Megan |
author_facet | Szigethy, Eva Solano, Francis Wallace, Meredith Perry, Dina L Morrell, Lauren Scott, Kathryn Bell, Megan Jones Oser, Megan |
author_sort | Szigethy, Eva |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and subclinical GAD are highly prevalent in primary care. Unmanaged anxiety worsens quality of life in patients seen in primary care practices and leads to increased medical utilisation and costs. Programmes that teach patients cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) techniques have been shown to improve anxiety and to prevent the evolution of anxiety symptoms to disorders, but access and engagement have hampered integration of CBT into medical settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This pragmatic study takes place in University of Pittsburgh Medical Center primary care practices to evaluate a coach-supported mobile cognitive– behavioural programme (Lantern) on anxiety symptoms and quality of life. Clinics were non-randomly assigned to either enhanced treatment as usual or Lantern. All clinics provide electronic screening for anxiety and, within clinics assigned to Lantern, patients meeting a threshold level of mild anxiety (ie, >5 on Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Questionnaire (GAD-7)) are referred to Lantern. The first study phase is aimed at establishing feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness. The second phase focuses on long-term impact on psychosocial outcomes, healthcare utilisation and clinic/provider adoption/sustainable implementation using a propensity score matched parallel group study design. Primary outcomes are changes in anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) and quality of life (Short-Form Health Survey) between baseline and 6-month follow-ups, comparing control and intervention. Secondary outcomes include provider and patient satisfaction, patient engagement, durability of changes in anxiety symptoms and quality of life over 12 months and the impact of Lantern on healthcare utilisation over 12 months. Patients from control sites will be matched to the patients who use the mobile app. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics and human subject research approval were obtained. A data safety monitoring board is overseeing trial data and ethics. Results will be communicated to participating primary care practices, published and presented at clinical and scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03035019. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5781102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57811022018-01-31 A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care Szigethy, Eva Solano, Francis Wallace, Meredith Perry, Dina L Morrell, Lauren Scott, Kathryn Bell, Megan Jones Oser, Megan BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and subclinical GAD are highly prevalent in primary care. Unmanaged anxiety worsens quality of life in patients seen in primary care practices and leads to increased medical utilisation and costs. Programmes that teach patients cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) techniques have been shown to improve anxiety and to prevent the evolution of anxiety symptoms to disorders, but access and engagement have hampered integration of CBT into medical settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This pragmatic study takes place in University of Pittsburgh Medical Center primary care practices to evaluate a coach-supported mobile cognitive– behavioural programme (Lantern) on anxiety symptoms and quality of life. Clinics were non-randomly assigned to either enhanced treatment as usual or Lantern. All clinics provide electronic screening for anxiety and, within clinics assigned to Lantern, patients meeting a threshold level of mild anxiety (ie, >5 on Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Questionnaire (GAD-7)) are referred to Lantern. The first study phase is aimed at establishing feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness. The second phase focuses on long-term impact on psychosocial outcomes, healthcare utilisation and clinic/provider adoption/sustainable implementation using a propensity score matched parallel group study design. Primary outcomes are changes in anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) and quality of life (Short-Form Health Survey) between baseline and 6-month follow-ups, comparing control and intervention. Secondary outcomes include provider and patient satisfaction, patient engagement, durability of changes in anxiety symptoms and quality of life over 12 months and the impact of Lantern on healthcare utilisation over 12 months. Patients from control sites will be matched to the patients who use the mobile app. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics and human subject research approval were obtained. A data safety monitoring board is overseeing trial data and ethics. Results will be communicated to participating primary care practices, published and presented at clinical and scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03035019. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5781102/ /pubmed/29331971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019108 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Szigethy, Eva Solano, Francis Wallace, Meredith Perry, Dina L Morrell, Lauren Scott, Kathryn Bell, Megan Jones Oser, Megan A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care |
title | A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care |
title_full | A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care |
title_fullStr | A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care |
title_short | A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care |
title_sort | study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive–behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29331971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szigethyeva astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT solanofrancis astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT wallacemeredith astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT perrydinal astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT morrelllauren astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT scottkathryn astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT bellmeganjones astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT osermegan astudyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT szigethyeva studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT solanofrancis studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT wallacemeredith studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT perrydinal studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT morrelllauren studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT scottkathryn studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT bellmeganjones studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare AT osermegan studyprotocolforanonrandomisedcomparisontrialevaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofamobilecognitivebehaviouralprogrammewithintegratedcoachingforanxiousadultsinprimarycare |