Cargando…

Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure in Mid-Sized Cities (IBIMS): protocol for a natural experiment study in three Canadian cities

INTRODUCTION: Bicycling is promoted as a transportation and population health strategy globally. Yet bicycling has low uptake in North America (1%–2% of trips) compared with European bicycling cities (15%–40% of trips) and shows marked sex and age trends. Safety concerns due to collisions with motor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winters, Meghan, Branion-Calles, Michael, Therrien, Suzanne, Fuller, Daniel, Gauvin, Lise, Whitehurst, David G T, Nelson, Trisalyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29358440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019130
_version_ 1783294893608665088
author Winters, Meghan
Branion-Calles, Michael
Therrien, Suzanne
Fuller, Daniel
Gauvin, Lise
Whitehurst, David G T
Nelson, Trisalyn
author_facet Winters, Meghan
Branion-Calles, Michael
Therrien, Suzanne
Fuller, Daniel
Gauvin, Lise
Whitehurst, David G T
Nelson, Trisalyn
author_sort Winters, Meghan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Bicycling is promoted as a transportation and population health strategy globally. Yet bicycling has low uptake in North America (1%–2% of trips) compared with European bicycling cities (15%–40% of trips) and shows marked sex and age trends. Safety concerns due to collisions with motor vehicles are primary barriers. To attract the broader population to bicycling, many cities are making investments in bicycle infrastructure. These interventions hold promise for improving population health given the potential for increased physical activity and improved safety, but such outcomes have been largely unstudied. In 2016, the City of Victoria, Canada, committed to build a connected network of infrastructure that separates bicycles from motor vehicles, designed to attract people of ‘all ages and abilities’ to bicycling. This natural experiment study examines the impacts of the City of Victoria’s investment in a bicycle network on active travel and safety outcomes. The specific objectives are to (1) estimate changes in active travel, perceived safety and bicycle safety incidents; (2) analyse spatial inequities in access to bicycle infrastructure and safety incidents; and (3) assess health-related economic benefits. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is in three Canadian cities (intervention: Victoria; comparison: Kelowna, Halifax). We will administer population-based surveys in 2016, 2018 and 2021 (1000 people/city). The primary outcome is the proportion of people reporting bicycling. Secondary outcomes are perceived safety and bicycle safety incidents. Spatial analyses will compare the distribution of bicycle infrastructure and bicycle safety incidents across neighbourhoods and across time. We will also calculate the economic benefits of bicycling using WHO’s Health Economic Assessment Tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received approval from the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics (study no. 2016s0401). Findings will be disseminated via a website, presentations to stakeholders, at academic conferences and through peer-reviewed journal articles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5781157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57811572018-01-31 Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure in Mid-Sized Cities (IBIMS): protocol for a natural experiment study in three Canadian cities Winters, Meghan Branion-Calles, Michael Therrien, Suzanne Fuller, Daniel Gauvin, Lise Whitehurst, David G T Nelson, Trisalyn BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Bicycling is promoted as a transportation and population health strategy globally. Yet bicycling has low uptake in North America (1%–2% of trips) compared with European bicycling cities (15%–40% of trips) and shows marked sex and age trends. Safety concerns due to collisions with motor vehicles are primary barriers. To attract the broader population to bicycling, many cities are making investments in bicycle infrastructure. These interventions hold promise for improving population health given the potential for increased physical activity and improved safety, but such outcomes have been largely unstudied. In 2016, the City of Victoria, Canada, committed to build a connected network of infrastructure that separates bicycles from motor vehicles, designed to attract people of ‘all ages and abilities’ to bicycling. This natural experiment study examines the impacts of the City of Victoria’s investment in a bicycle network on active travel and safety outcomes. The specific objectives are to (1) estimate changes in active travel, perceived safety and bicycle safety incidents; (2) analyse spatial inequities in access to bicycle infrastructure and safety incidents; and (3) assess health-related economic benefits. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is in three Canadian cities (intervention: Victoria; comparison: Kelowna, Halifax). We will administer population-based surveys in 2016, 2018 and 2021 (1000 people/city). The primary outcome is the proportion of people reporting bicycling. Secondary outcomes are perceived safety and bicycle safety incidents. Spatial analyses will compare the distribution of bicycle infrastructure and bicycle safety incidents across neighbourhoods and across time. We will also calculate the economic benefits of bicycling using WHO’s Health Economic Assessment Tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received approval from the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics (study no. 2016s0401). Findings will be disseminated via a website, presentations to stakeholders, at academic conferences and through peer-reviewed journal articles. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5781157/ /pubmed/29358440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019130 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Winters, Meghan
Branion-Calles, Michael
Therrien, Suzanne
Fuller, Daniel
Gauvin, Lise
Whitehurst, David G T
Nelson, Trisalyn
Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure in Mid-Sized Cities (IBIMS): protocol for a natural experiment study in three Canadian cities
title Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure in Mid-Sized Cities (IBIMS): protocol for a natural experiment study in three Canadian cities
title_full Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure in Mid-Sized Cities (IBIMS): protocol for a natural experiment study in three Canadian cities
title_fullStr Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure in Mid-Sized Cities (IBIMS): protocol for a natural experiment study in three Canadian cities
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure in Mid-Sized Cities (IBIMS): protocol for a natural experiment study in three Canadian cities
title_short Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure in Mid-Sized Cities (IBIMS): protocol for a natural experiment study in three Canadian cities
title_sort impacts of bicycle infrastructure in mid-sized cities (ibims): protocol for a natural experiment study in three canadian cities
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29358440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019130
work_keys_str_mv AT wintersmeghan impactsofbicycleinfrastructureinmidsizedcitiesibimsprotocolforanaturalexperimentstudyinthreecanadiancities
AT branioncallesmichael impactsofbicycleinfrastructureinmidsizedcitiesibimsprotocolforanaturalexperimentstudyinthreecanadiancities
AT therriensuzanne impactsofbicycleinfrastructureinmidsizedcitiesibimsprotocolforanaturalexperimentstudyinthreecanadiancities
AT fullerdaniel impactsofbicycleinfrastructureinmidsizedcitiesibimsprotocolforanaturalexperimentstudyinthreecanadiancities
AT gauvinlise impactsofbicycleinfrastructureinmidsizedcitiesibimsprotocolforanaturalexperimentstudyinthreecanadiancities
AT whitehurstdavidgt impactsofbicycleinfrastructureinmidsizedcitiesibimsprotocolforanaturalexperimentstudyinthreecanadiancities
AT nelsontrisalyn impactsofbicycleinfrastructureinmidsizedcitiesibimsprotocolforanaturalexperimentstudyinthreecanadiancities