Cargando…
Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Shoulder dysfunction is common after neck dissection for head and neck cancer (HNC). Brief electrical stimulation (BES) is a novel technique that has been shown to enhance neuronal regeneration after nerve injury by modulating the brain-derived neurotrophic growth factor (BDNF) pathways....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29361981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0244-9 |
_version_ | 1783294922142515200 |
---|---|
author | Barber, Brittany Seikaly, Hadi Ming Chan, K. Beaudry, Rhys Rychlik, Shannon Olson, Jaret Curran, Matthew Dziegielewski, Peter Biron, Vincent Harris, Jeffrey McNeely, Margaret O’Connell, Daniel |
author_facet | Barber, Brittany Seikaly, Hadi Ming Chan, K. Beaudry, Rhys Rychlik, Shannon Olson, Jaret Curran, Matthew Dziegielewski, Peter Biron, Vincent Harris, Jeffrey McNeely, Margaret O’Connell, Daniel |
author_sort | Barber, Brittany |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Shoulder dysfunction is common after neck dissection for head and neck cancer (HNC). Brief electrical stimulation (BES) is a novel technique that has been shown to enhance neuronal regeneration after nerve injury by modulating the brain-derived neurotrophic growth factor (BDNF) pathways. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of BES on postoperative shoulder function following oncologic neck dissection. METHODS: Adult participants with a new diagnosis of HNC undergoing Level IIb +/− V neck dissection were recruited. Those in the treatment group received intraoperative BES applied to the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) after completion of neck dissection for 60 min of continuous 20 Hz stimulation at 3-5 V of 0.1 msec balanced biphasic pulses, while those in the control group received no stimulation (NS). The primary outcome measured was the Constant-Murley Shoulder (CMS) Score, comparing changes from baseline to 12 months post-neck dissection. Secondary outcomes included the change in the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (ΔNDII) score and the change in compound muscle action potential amplitude (ΔCMAP) over the same period. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were randomized to the treatment or control group with a 1:1 allocation scheme. No differences in demographics, tumor characteristics, or neck dissection types were found between groups. Significantly lower ΔCMS scores were observed in the BES group at 12 months, indicating better preservation of shoulder function (p = 0.007). Only four in the BES group compared to 17 patients in the NS groups saw decreases greater than the minimally important clinical difference (MICD) of the CMS (p = 0.023). However, NDII scores (p = 0.089) and CMAP amplitudes (p = 0.067) between the groups did not reach statistical significance at 12 months. BES participants with Level IIb + V neck dissections had significantly better ΔCMS and ΔCMAP scores at 12 months (p = 0.048 and p = 0.025, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Application of BES to the SAN may help reduce impaired shoulder function in patients undergoing oncologic neck dissection, and may be considered a viable adjunct to functional rehabilitation therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02268344, October 17, 2014). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5781293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57812932018-02-06 Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial Barber, Brittany Seikaly, Hadi Ming Chan, K. Beaudry, Rhys Rychlik, Shannon Olson, Jaret Curran, Matthew Dziegielewski, Peter Biron, Vincent Harris, Jeffrey McNeely, Margaret O’Connell, Daniel J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Shoulder dysfunction is common after neck dissection for head and neck cancer (HNC). Brief electrical stimulation (BES) is a novel technique that has been shown to enhance neuronal regeneration after nerve injury by modulating the brain-derived neurotrophic growth factor (BDNF) pathways. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of BES on postoperative shoulder function following oncologic neck dissection. METHODS: Adult participants with a new diagnosis of HNC undergoing Level IIb +/− V neck dissection were recruited. Those in the treatment group received intraoperative BES applied to the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) after completion of neck dissection for 60 min of continuous 20 Hz stimulation at 3-5 V of 0.1 msec balanced biphasic pulses, while those in the control group received no stimulation (NS). The primary outcome measured was the Constant-Murley Shoulder (CMS) Score, comparing changes from baseline to 12 months post-neck dissection. Secondary outcomes included the change in the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (ΔNDII) score and the change in compound muscle action potential amplitude (ΔCMAP) over the same period. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were randomized to the treatment or control group with a 1:1 allocation scheme. No differences in demographics, tumor characteristics, or neck dissection types were found between groups. Significantly lower ΔCMS scores were observed in the BES group at 12 months, indicating better preservation of shoulder function (p = 0.007). Only four in the BES group compared to 17 patients in the NS groups saw decreases greater than the minimally important clinical difference (MICD) of the CMS (p = 0.023). However, NDII scores (p = 0.089) and CMAP amplitudes (p = 0.067) between the groups did not reach statistical significance at 12 months. BES participants with Level IIb + V neck dissections had significantly better ΔCMS and ΔCMAP scores at 12 months (p = 0.048 and p = 0.025, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Application of BES to the SAN may help reduce impaired shoulder function in patients undergoing oncologic neck dissection, and may be considered a viable adjunct to functional rehabilitation therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02268344, October 17, 2014). BioMed Central 2018-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5781293/ /pubmed/29361981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0244-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Barber, Brittany Seikaly, Hadi Ming Chan, K. Beaudry, Rhys Rychlik, Shannon Olson, Jaret Curran, Matthew Dziegielewski, Peter Biron, Vincent Harris, Jeffrey McNeely, Margaret O’Connell, Daniel Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial |
title | Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | intraoperative brief electrical stimulation of the spinal accessory nerve (best spin) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29361981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0244-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barberbrittany intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT seikalyhadi intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mingchank intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT beaudryrhys intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rychlikshannon intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT olsonjaret intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT curranmatthew intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dziegielewskipeter intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bironvincent intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT harrisjeffrey intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcneelymargaret intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT oconnelldaniel intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial |