Cargando…

Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Shoulder dysfunction is common after neck dissection for head and neck cancer (HNC). Brief electrical stimulation (BES) is a novel technique that has been shown to enhance neuronal regeneration after nerve injury by modulating the brain-derived neurotrophic growth factor (BDNF) pathways....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barber, Brittany, Seikaly, Hadi, Ming Chan, K., Beaudry, Rhys, Rychlik, Shannon, Olson, Jaret, Curran, Matthew, Dziegielewski, Peter, Biron, Vincent, Harris, Jeffrey, McNeely, Margaret, O’Connell, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29361981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0244-9
_version_ 1783294922142515200
author Barber, Brittany
Seikaly, Hadi
Ming Chan, K.
Beaudry, Rhys
Rychlik, Shannon
Olson, Jaret
Curran, Matthew
Dziegielewski, Peter
Biron, Vincent
Harris, Jeffrey
McNeely, Margaret
O’Connell, Daniel
author_facet Barber, Brittany
Seikaly, Hadi
Ming Chan, K.
Beaudry, Rhys
Rychlik, Shannon
Olson, Jaret
Curran, Matthew
Dziegielewski, Peter
Biron, Vincent
Harris, Jeffrey
McNeely, Margaret
O’Connell, Daniel
author_sort Barber, Brittany
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shoulder dysfunction is common after neck dissection for head and neck cancer (HNC). Brief electrical stimulation (BES) is a novel technique that has been shown to enhance neuronal regeneration after nerve injury by modulating the brain-derived neurotrophic growth factor (BDNF) pathways. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of BES on postoperative shoulder function following oncologic neck dissection. METHODS: Adult participants with a new diagnosis of HNC undergoing Level IIb +/− V neck dissection were recruited. Those in the treatment group received intraoperative BES applied to the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) after completion of neck dissection for 60 min of continuous 20 Hz stimulation at 3-5 V of 0.1 msec balanced biphasic pulses, while those in the control group received no stimulation (NS). The primary outcome measured was the Constant-Murley Shoulder (CMS) Score, comparing changes from baseline to 12 months post-neck dissection. Secondary outcomes included the change in the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (ΔNDII) score and the change in compound muscle action potential amplitude (ΔCMAP) over the same period. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were randomized to the treatment or control group with a 1:1 allocation scheme. No differences in demographics, tumor characteristics, or neck dissection types were found between groups. Significantly lower ΔCMS scores were observed in the BES group at 12 months, indicating better preservation of shoulder function (p = 0.007). Only four in the BES group compared to 17 patients in the NS groups saw decreases greater than the minimally important clinical difference (MICD) of the CMS (p = 0.023). However, NDII scores (p = 0.089) and CMAP amplitudes (p = 0.067) between the groups did not reach statistical significance at 12 months. BES participants with Level IIb + V neck dissections had significantly better ΔCMS and ΔCMAP scores at 12 months (p = 0.048 and p = 0.025, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Application of BES to the SAN may help reduce impaired shoulder function in patients undergoing oncologic neck dissection, and may be considered a viable adjunct to functional rehabilitation therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02268344, October 17, 2014).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5781293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57812932018-02-06 Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial Barber, Brittany Seikaly, Hadi Ming Chan, K. Beaudry, Rhys Rychlik, Shannon Olson, Jaret Curran, Matthew Dziegielewski, Peter Biron, Vincent Harris, Jeffrey McNeely, Margaret O’Connell, Daniel J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Shoulder dysfunction is common after neck dissection for head and neck cancer (HNC). Brief electrical stimulation (BES) is a novel technique that has been shown to enhance neuronal regeneration after nerve injury by modulating the brain-derived neurotrophic growth factor (BDNF) pathways. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of BES on postoperative shoulder function following oncologic neck dissection. METHODS: Adult participants with a new diagnosis of HNC undergoing Level IIb +/− V neck dissection were recruited. Those in the treatment group received intraoperative BES applied to the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) after completion of neck dissection for 60 min of continuous 20 Hz stimulation at 3-5 V of 0.1 msec balanced biphasic pulses, while those in the control group received no stimulation (NS). The primary outcome measured was the Constant-Murley Shoulder (CMS) Score, comparing changes from baseline to 12 months post-neck dissection. Secondary outcomes included the change in the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (ΔNDII) score and the change in compound muscle action potential amplitude (ΔCMAP) over the same period. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were randomized to the treatment or control group with a 1:1 allocation scheme. No differences in demographics, tumor characteristics, or neck dissection types were found between groups. Significantly lower ΔCMS scores were observed in the BES group at 12 months, indicating better preservation of shoulder function (p = 0.007). Only four in the BES group compared to 17 patients in the NS groups saw decreases greater than the minimally important clinical difference (MICD) of the CMS (p = 0.023). However, NDII scores (p = 0.089) and CMAP amplitudes (p = 0.067) between the groups did not reach statistical significance at 12 months. BES participants with Level IIb + V neck dissections had significantly better ΔCMS and ΔCMAP scores at 12 months (p = 0.048 and p = 0.025, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Application of BES to the SAN may help reduce impaired shoulder function in patients undergoing oncologic neck dissection, and may be considered a viable adjunct to functional rehabilitation therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02268344, October 17, 2014). BioMed Central 2018-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5781293/ /pubmed/29361981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0244-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Barber, Brittany
Seikaly, Hadi
Ming Chan, K.
Beaudry, Rhys
Rychlik, Shannon
Olson, Jaret
Curran, Matthew
Dziegielewski, Peter
Biron, Vincent
Harris, Jeffrey
McNeely, Margaret
O’Connell, Daniel
Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
title Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_full Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_short Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_sort intraoperative brief electrical stimulation of the spinal accessory nerve (best spin) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29361981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0244-9
work_keys_str_mv AT barberbrittany intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT seikalyhadi intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mingchank intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT beaudryrhys intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rychlikshannon intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT olsonjaret intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT curranmatthew intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dziegielewskipeter intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bironvincent intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT harrisjeffrey intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcneelymargaret intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT oconnelldaniel intraoperativebriefelectricalstimulationofthespinalaccessorynervebestspinforpreventionofshoulderdysfunctionafteroncologicneckdissectionadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial