Cargando…

Use of DAVID algorithms for clustering custom annotated gene lists in a non-model organism, rainbow trout

OBJECTIVE: The DAVID gene functional classification tool requires adaptations for use in non-model species and there is little available information to guide selection of a kappa score. Our objective was to develop an R-script that allows custom gene identifiers and novel annotation information to b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Hao, Gao, Guangtu, Weber, Gregory M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29361978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3154-7
_version_ 1783294922622763008
author Ma, Hao
Gao, Guangtu
Weber, Gregory M.
author_facet Ma, Hao
Gao, Guangtu
Weber, Gregory M.
author_sort Ma, Hao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The DAVID gene functional classification tool requires adaptations for use in non-model species and there is little available information to guide selection of a kappa score. Our objective was to develop an R-script that allows custom gene identifiers and novel annotation information to be incorporated into analyses, then use such data to evaluate the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in a comparison based on kappa score selection. RESULTS: Using an R-script we developed and multiple data sets ranging from 555 to 3340 annotated DEGs from a study in rainbow trout, we found the percentage of DEGs harbored within a module and the number of genes shared among multiple modules decreased with increasing kappa score regardless of the number of DEGs in the comparison. The number of genes in enriched modules peaked at a kappa score of 0.5 for the comparisons with 3340 and 1313 DEGs and 0.3 for 555 DEGs. The number of genes harbored within enriched modules generally decreased with increasing kappa score; however, this was affected by whether the largest modules were significantly enriched. Large non-enriched modules can be reanalyzed using a higher kappa score resulting in some of the genes clustering in smaller enriched modules. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3154-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5781295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57812952018-02-06 Use of DAVID algorithms for clustering custom annotated gene lists in a non-model organism, rainbow trout Ma, Hao Gao, Guangtu Weber, Gregory M. BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: The DAVID gene functional classification tool requires adaptations for use in non-model species and there is little available information to guide selection of a kappa score. Our objective was to develop an R-script that allows custom gene identifiers and novel annotation information to be incorporated into analyses, then use such data to evaluate the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in a comparison based on kappa score selection. RESULTS: Using an R-script we developed and multiple data sets ranging from 555 to 3340 annotated DEGs from a study in rainbow trout, we found the percentage of DEGs harbored within a module and the number of genes shared among multiple modules decreased with increasing kappa score regardless of the number of DEGs in the comparison. The number of genes in enriched modules peaked at a kappa score of 0.5 for the comparisons with 3340 and 1313 DEGs and 0.3 for 555 DEGs. The number of genes harbored within enriched modules generally decreased with increasing kappa score; however, this was affected by whether the largest modules were significantly enriched. Large non-enriched modules can be reanalyzed using a higher kappa score resulting in some of the genes clustering in smaller enriched modules. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3154-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5781295/ /pubmed/29361978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3154-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Note
Ma, Hao
Gao, Guangtu
Weber, Gregory M.
Use of DAVID algorithms for clustering custom annotated gene lists in a non-model organism, rainbow trout
title Use of DAVID algorithms for clustering custom annotated gene lists in a non-model organism, rainbow trout
title_full Use of DAVID algorithms for clustering custom annotated gene lists in a non-model organism, rainbow trout
title_fullStr Use of DAVID algorithms for clustering custom annotated gene lists in a non-model organism, rainbow trout
title_full_unstemmed Use of DAVID algorithms for clustering custom annotated gene lists in a non-model organism, rainbow trout
title_short Use of DAVID algorithms for clustering custom annotated gene lists in a non-model organism, rainbow trout
title_sort use of david algorithms for clustering custom annotated gene lists in a non-model organism, rainbow trout
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29361978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3154-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mahao useofdavidalgorithmsforclusteringcustomannotatedgenelistsinanonmodelorganismrainbowtrout
AT gaoguangtu useofdavidalgorithmsforclusteringcustomannotatedgenelistsinanonmodelorganismrainbowtrout
AT webergregorym useofdavidalgorithmsforclusteringcustomannotatedgenelistsinanonmodelorganismrainbowtrout