Cargando…

Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care

BACKGROUND: Failure to include socio-economically deprived or ethnic minority groups in physical activity (PA) trials may limit representativeness and could lead to implementation of interventions that then increase health inequalities. Randomised intervention trials often have low recruitment rates...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kerry, Sally M., Morgan, Katy E., Limb, Elizabeth, Cook, Derek G., Furness, Cheryl, Carey, Iain, DeWilde, Steve, Victor, Christina R., Iliffe, Steve, Whincup, Peter, Ussher, Michael, Ekelund, Ulf, Fox-Rushby, Julia, Ibison, Judith, Harris, Tess
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29361929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5034-4
_version_ 1783294927328772096
author Kerry, Sally M.
Morgan, Katy E.
Limb, Elizabeth
Cook, Derek G.
Furness, Cheryl
Carey, Iain
DeWilde, Steve
Victor, Christina R.
Iliffe, Steve
Whincup, Peter
Ussher, Michael
Ekelund, Ulf
Fox-Rushby, Julia
Ibison, Judith
Harris, Tess
author_facet Kerry, Sally M.
Morgan, Katy E.
Limb, Elizabeth
Cook, Derek G.
Furness, Cheryl
Carey, Iain
DeWilde, Steve
Victor, Christina R.
Iliffe, Steve
Whincup, Peter
Ussher, Michael
Ekelund, Ulf
Fox-Rushby, Julia
Ibison, Judith
Harris, Tess
author_sort Kerry, Sally M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Failure to include socio-economically deprived or ethnic minority groups in physical activity (PA) trials may limit representativeness and could lead to implementation of interventions that then increase health inequalities. Randomised intervention trials often have low recruitment rates and rarely assess recruitment bias. A previous trial by the same team using similar methods recruited 30% of the eligible population but was in an affluent setting with few non-white residents and was limited to those over 60 years of age. METHODS: PACE-UP is a large, effective, population-based walking trial in inactive 45-75 year-olds that recruited through seven London general practices. Anonymised practice demographic data were available for all those invited, enabling investigation of inequalities in trial recruitment. Non-participants were invited to complete a questionnaire. RESULTS: From 10,927 postal invitations, 1150 (10.5%) completed baseline assessment. Participation rate ratios (95% CI), adjusted for age and gender as appropriate, were lower in men 0.59 (0.52, 0.67) than women, in those under 55 compared with those ≥65, 0.60 (0.51, 0.71), in the most deprived quintile compared with the least deprived 0.52 (0.39, 0.70) and in Asian individuals compared with whites 0.62 (0.50, 0.76). Black individuals were equally likely to participate as white individuals. Participation was also associated with having a co-morbidity or some degree of health limitation. The most common reasons for non-participation were considering themselves as being too active or lack of time. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting the trial in this diverse setting reduced overall response, with lower response in socio-economically deprived and Asian sub-groups. Trials with greater reach are likely to be more expensive in terms of recruitment and gains in generalizability need to be balanced with greater costs. Differential uptake of successful trial interventions may increase inequalities in PA levels and should be monitored. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN.com ISRCTN98538934. Registered 2nd March 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5781315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57813152018-02-06 Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care Kerry, Sally M. Morgan, Katy E. Limb, Elizabeth Cook, Derek G. Furness, Cheryl Carey, Iain DeWilde, Steve Victor, Christina R. Iliffe, Steve Whincup, Peter Ussher, Michael Ekelund, Ulf Fox-Rushby, Julia Ibison, Judith Harris, Tess BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Failure to include socio-economically deprived or ethnic minority groups in physical activity (PA) trials may limit representativeness and could lead to implementation of interventions that then increase health inequalities. Randomised intervention trials often have low recruitment rates and rarely assess recruitment bias. A previous trial by the same team using similar methods recruited 30% of the eligible population but was in an affluent setting with few non-white residents and was limited to those over 60 years of age. METHODS: PACE-UP is a large, effective, population-based walking trial in inactive 45-75 year-olds that recruited through seven London general practices. Anonymised practice demographic data were available for all those invited, enabling investigation of inequalities in trial recruitment. Non-participants were invited to complete a questionnaire. RESULTS: From 10,927 postal invitations, 1150 (10.5%) completed baseline assessment. Participation rate ratios (95% CI), adjusted for age and gender as appropriate, were lower in men 0.59 (0.52, 0.67) than women, in those under 55 compared with those ≥65, 0.60 (0.51, 0.71), in the most deprived quintile compared with the least deprived 0.52 (0.39, 0.70) and in Asian individuals compared with whites 0.62 (0.50, 0.76). Black individuals were equally likely to participate as white individuals. Participation was also associated with having a co-morbidity or some degree of health limitation. The most common reasons for non-participation were considering themselves as being too active or lack of time. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting the trial in this diverse setting reduced overall response, with lower response in socio-economically deprived and Asian sub-groups. Trials with greater reach are likely to be more expensive in terms of recruitment and gains in generalizability need to be balanced with greater costs. Differential uptake of successful trial interventions may increase inequalities in PA levels and should be monitored. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN.com ISRCTN98538934. Registered 2nd March 2012. BioMed Central 2018-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5781315/ /pubmed/29361929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5034-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kerry, Sally M.
Morgan, Katy E.
Limb, Elizabeth
Cook, Derek G.
Furness, Cheryl
Carey, Iain
DeWilde, Steve
Victor, Christina R.
Iliffe, Steve
Whincup, Peter
Ussher, Michael
Ekelund, Ulf
Fox-Rushby, Julia
Ibison, Judith
Harris, Tess
Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care
title Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care
title_full Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care
title_fullStr Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care
title_short Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care
title_sort interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29361929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5034-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kerrysallym interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT morgankatye interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT limbelizabeth interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT cookderekg interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT furnesscheryl interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT careyiain interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT dewildesteve interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT victorchristinar interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT iliffesteve interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT whincuppeter interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT usshermichael interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT ekelundulf interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT foxrushbyjulia interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT ibisonjudith interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare
AT harristess interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare