Cargando…
Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care
BACKGROUND: Failure to include socio-economically deprived or ethnic minority groups in physical activity (PA) trials may limit representativeness and could lead to implementation of interventions that then increase health inequalities. Randomised intervention trials often have low recruitment rates...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29361929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5034-4 |
_version_ | 1783294927328772096 |
---|---|
author | Kerry, Sally M. Morgan, Katy E. Limb, Elizabeth Cook, Derek G. Furness, Cheryl Carey, Iain DeWilde, Steve Victor, Christina R. Iliffe, Steve Whincup, Peter Ussher, Michael Ekelund, Ulf Fox-Rushby, Julia Ibison, Judith Harris, Tess |
author_facet | Kerry, Sally M. Morgan, Katy E. Limb, Elizabeth Cook, Derek G. Furness, Cheryl Carey, Iain DeWilde, Steve Victor, Christina R. Iliffe, Steve Whincup, Peter Ussher, Michael Ekelund, Ulf Fox-Rushby, Julia Ibison, Judith Harris, Tess |
author_sort | Kerry, Sally M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Failure to include socio-economically deprived or ethnic minority groups in physical activity (PA) trials may limit representativeness and could lead to implementation of interventions that then increase health inequalities. Randomised intervention trials often have low recruitment rates and rarely assess recruitment bias. A previous trial by the same team using similar methods recruited 30% of the eligible population but was in an affluent setting with few non-white residents and was limited to those over 60 years of age. METHODS: PACE-UP is a large, effective, population-based walking trial in inactive 45-75 year-olds that recruited through seven London general practices. Anonymised practice demographic data were available for all those invited, enabling investigation of inequalities in trial recruitment. Non-participants were invited to complete a questionnaire. RESULTS: From 10,927 postal invitations, 1150 (10.5%) completed baseline assessment. Participation rate ratios (95% CI), adjusted for age and gender as appropriate, were lower in men 0.59 (0.52, 0.67) than women, in those under 55 compared with those ≥65, 0.60 (0.51, 0.71), in the most deprived quintile compared with the least deprived 0.52 (0.39, 0.70) and in Asian individuals compared with whites 0.62 (0.50, 0.76). Black individuals were equally likely to participate as white individuals. Participation was also associated with having a co-morbidity or some degree of health limitation. The most common reasons for non-participation were considering themselves as being too active or lack of time. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting the trial in this diverse setting reduced overall response, with lower response in socio-economically deprived and Asian sub-groups. Trials with greater reach are likely to be more expensive in terms of recruitment and gains in generalizability need to be balanced with greater costs. Differential uptake of successful trial interventions may increase inequalities in PA levels and should be monitored. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN.com ISRCTN98538934. Registered 2nd March 2012. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5781315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57813152018-02-06 Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care Kerry, Sally M. Morgan, Katy E. Limb, Elizabeth Cook, Derek G. Furness, Cheryl Carey, Iain DeWilde, Steve Victor, Christina R. Iliffe, Steve Whincup, Peter Ussher, Michael Ekelund, Ulf Fox-Rushby, Julia Ibison, Judith Harris, Tess BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Failure to include socio-economically deprived or ethnic minority groups in physical activity (PA) trials may limit representativeness and could lead to implementation of interventions that then increase health inequalities. Randomised intervention trials often have low recruitment rates and rarely assess recruitment bias. A previous trial by the same team using similar methods recruited 30% of the eligible population but was in an affluent setting with few non-white residents and was limited to those over 60 years of age. METHODS: PACE-UP is a large, effective, population-based walking trial in inactive 45-75 year-olds that recruited through seven London general practices. Anonymised practice demographic data were available for all those invited, enabling investigation of inequalities in trial recruitment. Non-participants were invited to complete a questionnaire. RESULTS: From 10,927 postal invitations, 1150 (10.5%) completed baseline assessment. Participation rate ratios (95% CI), adjusted for age and gender as appropriate, were lower in men 0.59 (0.52, 0.67) than women, in those under 55 compared with those ≥65, 0.60 (0.51, 0.71), in the most deprived quintile compared with the least deprived 0.52 (0.39, 0.70) and in Asian individuals compared with whites 0.62 (0.50, 0.76). Black individuals were equally likely to participate as white individuals. Participation was also associated with having a co-morbidity or some degree of health limitation. The most common reasons for non-participation were considering themselves as being too active or lack of time. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting the trial in this diverse setting reduced overall response, with lower response in socio-economically deprived and Asian sub-groups. Trials with greater reach are likely to be more expensive in terms of recruitment and gains in generalizability need to be balanced with greater costs. Differential uptake of successful trial interventions may increase inequalities in PA levels and should be monitored. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN.com ISRCTN98538934. Registered 2nd March 2012. BioMed Central 2018-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5781315/ /pubmed/29361929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5034-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kerry, Sally M. Morgan, Katy E. Limb, Elizabeth Cook, Derek G. Furness, Cheryl Carey, Iain DeWilde, Steve Victor, Christina R. Iliffe, Steve Whincup, Peter Ussher, Michael Ekelund, Ulf Fox-Rushby, Julia Ibison, Judith Harris, Tess Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care |
title | Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care |
title_full | Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care |
title_fullStr | Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care |
title_short | Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care |
title_sort | interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29361929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5034-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kerrysallym interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT morgankatye interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT limbelizabeth interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT cookderekg interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT furnesscheryl interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT careyiain interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT dewildesteve interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT victorchristinar interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT iliffesteve interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT whincuppeter interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT usshermichael interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT ekelundulf interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT foxrushbyjulia interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT ibisonjudith interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare AT harristess interpretingpopulationreachofalargesuccessfulphysicalactivitytrialdeliveredthroughprimarycare |