Cargando…

Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women attending Boo-Ali Hospital Tehran Iran: Urine analysis vs. urine culture

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic bacteriuria is one of the common problems in pregnancy. Asymptomatic bacteriuria is associated with pyelonephritis, preterm labor and low birth weight infants. The physiological and anatomical changes in pregnancy facilitate urinary tract infection (UTI) during pregnancy. Se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Etminan-Bakhsh, Mina, Tadi, Sima, Darabi, Roksana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Electronic physician 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5783125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403616
http://dx.doi.org/10.19082/5760
_version_ 1783295237362286592
author Etminan-Bakhsh, Mina
Tadi, Sima
Darabi, Roksana
author_facet Etminan-Bakhsh, Mina
Tadi, Sima
Darabi, Roksana
author_sort Etminan-Bakhsh, Mina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic bacteriuria is one of the common problems in pregnancy. Asymptomatic bacteriuria is associated with pyelonephritis, preterm labor and low birth weight infants. The physiological and anatomical changes in pregnancy facilitate urinary tract infection (UTI) during pregnancy. Several tests are available for diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria. The urine culture is a gold standard diagnostic test for asymptomatic bacteriuria but it is expensive and time-consuming. Screening methods may be useful in detecting high-risk pregnant women for asymptomatic bacteriuria. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare urine analysis as a rapid screening test to urine culture in diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria. METHODS: A total of 123 pregnant women attending the obstetrics clinic of Boo-Ali hospital in Tehran, Iran from March 2013 to September 2014 were included in the present diagnostic cross-sectional study. One hundred twenty three mid-stream urine samples were inoculated into cultures and were processed by dipstick (nitrite test and leucocyte esterase test) and microscopic pus cell count. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of nitrite test, leucocyte esterase test and microscopic pus cell count were compared with urine culture in diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria by using SPSS version 19. RESULTS: Of 123 urine samples, significant asymptomatic bacteriuria (≥10(4) cfu/Ml) was detected in 8 (6.5%) subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of nitrite test were 37% and 100% respectively. The sensitivity of pus cell count alone and leucocyte esterase test alone were 100% but the specificity of them were 64% and 65% respectively. We found high negative predictive value by Pus cell count and the leucocyte esterase test (100%) and low positive predictive value by them (16% and 17% respectively). CONCLUSION: Urine culture is the most useful test for diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria. None of our screening tests had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%, whereas we can only refer the pregnant women with positive leucocyte esterase test and significant pyuria to the urine culture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5783125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Electronic physician
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57831252018-02-05 Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women attending Boo-Ali Hospital Tehran Iran: Urine analysis vs. urine culture Etminan-Bakhsh, Mina Tadi, Sima Darabi, Roksana Electron Physician Original Article BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic bacteriuria is one of the common problems in pregnancy. Asymptomatic bacteriuria is associated with pyelonephritis, preterm labor and low birth weight infants. The physiological and anatomical changes in pregnancy facilitate urinary tract infection (UTI) during pregnancy. Several tests are available for diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria. The urine culture is a gold standard diagnostic test for asymptomatic bacteriuria but it is expensive and time-consuming. Screening methods may be useful in detecting high-risk pregnant women for asymptomatic bacteriuria. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare urine analysis as a rapid screening test to urine culture in diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria. METHODS: A total of 123 pregnant women attending the obstetrics clinic of Boo-Ali hospital in Tehran, Iran from March 2013 to September 2014 were included in the present diagnostic cross-sectional study. One hundred twenty three mid-stream urine samples were inoculated into cultures and were processed by dipstick (nitrite test and leucocyte esterase test) and microscopic pus cell count. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of nitrite test, leucocyte esterase test and microscopic pus cell count were compared with urine culture in diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria by using SPSS version 19. RESULTS: Of 123 urine samples, significant asymptomatic bacteriuria (≥10(4) cfu/Ml) was detected in 8 (6.5%) subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of nitrite test were 37% and 100% respectively. The sensitivity of pus cell count alone and leucocyte esterase test alone were 100% but the specificity of them were 64% and 65% respectively. We found high negative predictive value by Pus cell count and the leucocyte esterase test (100%) and low positive predictive value by them (16% and 17% respectively). CONCLUSION: Urine culture is the most useful test for diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria. None of our screening tests had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%, whereas we can only refer the pregnant women with positive leucocyte esterase test and significant pyuria to the urine culture. Electronic physician 2017-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5783125/ /pubmed/29403616 http://dx.doi.org/10.19082/5760 Text en © 2017 The Authors This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Etminan-Bakhsh, Mina
Tadi, Sima
Darabi, Roksana
Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women attending Boo-Ali Hospital Tehran Iran: Urine analysis vs. urine culture
title Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women attending Boo-Ali Hospital Tehran Iran: Urine analysis vs. urine culture
title_full Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women attending Boo-Ali Hospital Tehran Iran: Urine analysis vs. urine culture
title_fullStr Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women attending Boo-Ali Hospital Tehran Iran: Urine analysis vs. urine culture
title_full_unstemmed Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women attending Boo-Ali Hospital Tehran Iran: Urine analysis vs. urine culture
title_short Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women attending Boo-Ali Hospital Tehran Iran: Urine analysis vs. urine culture
title_sort asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women attending boo-ali hospital tehran iran: urine analysis vs. urine culture
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5783125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403616
http://dx.doi.org/10.19082/5760
work_keys_str_mv AT etminanbakhshmina asymptomaticbacteriuriainpregnantwomenattendingbooalihospitaltehraniranurineanalysisvsurineculture
AT tadisima asymptomaticbacteriuriainpregnantwomenattendingbooalihospitaltehraniranurineanalysisvsurineculture
AT darabiroksana asymptomaticbacteriuriainpregnantwomenattendingbooalihospitaltehraniranurineanalysisvsurineculture