Cargando…

A comparison of QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR and ARMS-PCR for measuring plasma EGFR T790M mutations of NSCLC patients

BACKGROUND: The AURA3 clinical trial has shown that advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR T790M mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could benefit from osimertinib. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR System platfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Qin, Gai, Fei, Sang, Yaxiong, Zhang, Jie, Wang, Ping, Wang, Yue, Liu, Bing, Lin, Dongmei, Yu, Yang, Fang, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5783148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403309
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S148134
_version_ 1783295242826416128
author Feng, Qin
Gai, Fei
Sang, Yaxiong
Zhang, Jie
Wang, Ping
Wang, Yue
Liu, Bing
Lin, Dongmei
Yu, Yang
Fang, Jian
author_facet Feng, Qin
Gai, Fei
Sang, Yaxiong
Zhang, Jie
Wang, Ping
Wang, Yue
Liu, Bing
Lin, Dongmei
Yu, Yang
Fang, Jian
author_sort Feng, Qin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The AURA3 clinical trial has shown that advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR T790M mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could benefit from osimertinib. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR System platform for the detection of plasma EGFR T790M mutations in NSCLC patients, and compare the performances of 3D Digital PCR and ARMS-PCR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 119 Chinese patients were enrolled in this study. Mutant allele frequency of plasma EGFR T790M was detected by 3D Digital PCR, then 25 selected samples were verified by ARMS-PCR and four of them were verified by next generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: In total, 52.94% (69/119) had EGFR T790M mutations detected by 3D Digital PCR. In 69 positive samples, the median mutant allele frequency (AF) was 1.09% and three cases presented low concentration (AF <0.1%). Limited by the amount of plasma DNA, 17 samples (AF <2.5%) and eight samples (T790M-) were selected for verification by ARMS-PCR. Four of those samples were verified by NGS as a third verification method. Among the selected 17 positive cases, ten samples presented mutant allele frequency <0.5%, and seven samples presented intermediate mutant allele frequency (0.5% AF 2.5%). However, only three samples (3/17) were identified as positive by ARMS-PCR, namely, P6 (AF =1.09%), P7 (AF =2.09%), and P8 (AF =2.21%). It is worth mentioning that sample P9 (AF =2.05%, analyzed by 3D Digital PCR) was identified as T790M- by ARMS-PCR. Four samples were identified as T790M+ by both NGS and 3D Digital PCR, and typically three samples (3/4) presented at a low ratio (AF <0.5%). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that 3D Digital PCR is a novel method with high sensitivity and specificity to detect EGFR T790M mutation in plasma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5783148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57831482018-02-05 A comparison of QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR and ARMS-PCR for measuring plasma EGFR T790M mutations of NSCLC patients Feng, Qin Gai, Fei Sang, Yaxiong Zhang, Jie Wang, Ping Wang, Yue Liu, Bing Lin, Dongmei Yu, Yang Fang, Jian Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The AURA3 clinical trial has shown that advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR T790M mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could benefit from osimertinib. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR System platform for the detection of plasma EGFR T790M mutations in NSCLC patients, and compare the performances of 3D Digital PCR and ARMS-PCR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 119 Chinese patients were enrolled in this study. Mutant allele frequency of plasma EGFR T790M was detected by 3D Digital PCR, then 25 selected samples were verified by ARMS-PCR and four of them were verified by next generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: In total, 52.94% (69/119) had EGFR T790M mutations detected by 3D Digital PCR. In 69 positive samples, the median mutant allele frequency (AF) was 1.09% and three cases presented low concentration (AF <0.1%). Limited by the amount of plasma DNA, 17 samples (AF <2.5%) and eight samples (T790M-) were selected for verification by ARMS-PCR. Four of those samples were verified by NGS as a third verification method. Among the selected 17 positive cases, ten samples presented mutant allele frequency <0.5%, and seven samples presented intermediate mutant allele frequency (0.5% AF 2.5%). However, only three samples (3/17) were identified as positive by ARMS-PCR, namely, P6 (AF =1.09%), P7 (AF =2.09%), and P8 (AF =2.21%). It is worth mentioning that sample P9 (AF =2.05%, analyzed by 3D Digital PCR) was identified as T790M- by ARMS-PCR. Four samples were identified as T790M+ by both NGS and 3D Digital PCR, and typically three samples (3/4) presented at a low ratio (AF <0.5%). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that 3D Digital PCR is a novel method with high sensitivity and specificity to detect EGFR T790M mutation in plasma. Dove Medical Press 2018-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5783148/ /pubmed/29403309 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S148134 Text en © 2018 Feng et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Feng, Qin
Gai, Fei
Sang, Yaxiong
Zhang, Jie
Wang, Ping
Wang, Yue
Liu, Bing
Lin, Dongmei
Yu, Yang
Fang, Jian
A comparison of QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR and ARMS-PCR for measuring plasma EGFR T790M mutations of NSCLC patients
title A comparison of QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR and ARMS-PCR for measuring plasma EGFR T790M mutations of NSCLC patients
title_full A comparison of QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR and ARMS-PCR for measuring plasma EGFR T790M mutations of NSCLC patients
title_fullStr A comparison of QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR and ARMS-PCR for measuring plasma EGFR T790M mutations of NSCLC patients
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR and ARMS-PCR for measuring plasma EGFR T790M mutations of NSCLC patients
title_short A comparison of QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR and ARMS-PCR for measuring plasma EGFR T790M mutations of NSCLC patients
title_sort comparison of quantstudio™ 3d digital pcr and arms-pcr for measuring plasma egfr t790m mutations of nsclc patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5783148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403309
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S148134
work_keys_str_mv AT fengqin acomparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT gaifei acomparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT sangyaxiong acomparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT zhangjie acomparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT wangping acomparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT wangyue acomparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT liubing acomparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT lindongmei acomparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT yuyang acomparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT fangjian acomparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT fengqin comparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT gaifei comparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT sangyaxiong comparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT zhangjie comparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT wangping comparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT wangyue comparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT liubing comparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT lindongmei comparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT yuyang comparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients
AT fangjian comparisonofquantstudio3ddigitalpcrandarmspcrformeasuringplasmaegfrt790mmutationsofnsclcpatients