Cargando…

Difficult decisions: Evaluating individual and couple-level fertility intentions and HIV acquisition among HIV serodiscordant couples in Zambia

INTRODUCTION: Attempts to conceive and pregnancy may increase HIV transmission to sex partners and infants. Our study evaluated the association between fertility intentions and HIV acquisition among Zambian HIV-serodiscordant couples. METHODS: We collected demographic, behavioral, clinical exposures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joseph Davey, Dvora Leah, Wall, Kristin M., Kilembe, William, Khu, Naw Htee, Brill, Ilene, Vwalika, Bellington, Chomba, Elwyn, Mulenga, Joseph, Tichacek, Amanda, Gorbach, Pamina M., Allen, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5783339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189869
_version_ 1783295254858825728
author Joseph Davey, Dvora Leah
Wall, Kristin M.
Kilembe, William
Khu, Naw Htee
Brill, Ilene
Vwalika, Bellington
Chomba, Elwyn
Mulenga, Joseph
Tichacek, Amanda
Gorbach, Pamina M.
Allen, Susan
author_facet Joseph Davey, Dvora Leah
Wall, Kristin M.
Kilembe, William
Khu, Naw Htee
Brill, Ilene
Vwalika, Bellington
Chomba, Elwyn
Mulenga, Joseph
Tichacek, Amanda
Gorbach, Pamina M.
Allen, Susan
author_sort Joseph Davey, Dvora Leah
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Attempts to conceive and pregnancy may increase HIV transmission to sex partners and infants. Our study evaluated the association between fertility intentions and HIV acquisition among Zambian HIV-serodiscordant couples. METHODS: We collected demographic, behavioral, clinical exposures, and data on fertility intentions in a cohort of HIV-serodiscordant couples in Lusaka, Zambia from 2005 to 2012. We evaluated factors associated with fertility intentions stratified by gender using multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the associations between fertility intentions and HIV acquisition controlling for a priori confounders and covariates that substantially (>10%) changed the effect estimates in univariate analyses. RESULTS: Among 1,029 serodiscordant couples, 311 agreed that they wanted children in the future (30%), 368 agreed they did not want children (36%), and 344 couples disagreed about having children (34%), with men more likely than women to want children. Women wanting child(ren) was associated with increased odds of baseline pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.93, 7.85)), fewer previous pregnancies (aOR = 0.85 per additional pregnancy (95% CI = 0.78, 0.93)), and partner fertility intention (aOR = 2.89 (95% CI = 2.14, 3.91)) adjusting for woman’s age, literacy, years cohabiting and HIV status. Men wanting child(ren) was associated with younger age (aOR = 0.96 per year (95% CI = 0.93, 0.99)), fewer years cohabiting (aOR = 0.95 (95% CI = 0.92, 0.98)), number of previous partners’ pregnancies (aOR = 0.90 (95% CI = 0.82, 0.98)), and partner fertility intention (aOR = 3.00 (95% CI = 2.21, 4.07)) adjusting for partner’s age, literacy, HIV status and partner’s baseline pregnancy. In adjusted survival analyses, HIV-negative women were more likely to seroconvert if they themselves wanted children (aHR = 2.36 (95% CI = 1.41, 3.96)) vs. did not want children, or if their partner wanted children (aHR = 2.34 (95% CI = 1.33, 4.11)) vs. did not want children, or if the couple agreed that they wanted children (aHR = 2.08 (95% CI = 1.01, 4.30)), adjusting for women’s age, women’s literacy, previous pregnancies and time in study. HIV-negative men were more likely to seroconvert if their female partner wanted a child in the next 12-months (aHR = 1.94 (95% CI = 1.02, 3.68)) vs. did not want children, and when both partners wanted children (aHR = 2.02 (CI = 1.09, 3.73)) vs. they did not want children, adjusting for men’s age and literacy, couple income, number of live children, male circumcision status and time in study. CONCLUSION: Women had increased risk of HIV acquisition if they and/or their partner wanted a child, while men had increased risk of HIV acquisition when their partner or if both partners agreed that they wanted children. Safer-conception interventions are needed to protect HIV uninfected women and men from HIV acquisition in HIV-serodiscordant couples who want children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5783339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57833392018-02-08 Difficult decisions: Evaluating individual and couple-level fertility intentions and HIV acquisition among HIV serodiscordant couples in Zambia Joseph Davey, Dvora Leah Wall, Kristin M. Kilembe, William Khu, Naw Htee Brill, Ilene Vwalika, Bellington Chomba, Elwyn Mulenga, Joseph Tichacek, Amanda Gorbach, Pamina M. Allen, Susan PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Attempts to conceive and pregnancy may increase HIV transmission to sex partners and infants. Our study evaluated the association between fertility intentions and HIV acquisition among Zambian HIV-serodiscordant couples. METHODS: We collected demographic, behavioral, clinical exposures, and data on fertility intentions in a cohort of HIV-serodiscordant couples in Lusaka, Zambia from 2005 to 2012. We evaluated factors associated with fertility intentions stratified by gender using multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the associations between fertility intentions and HIV acquisition controlling for a priori confounders and covariates that substantially (>10%) changed the effect estimates in univariate analyses. RESULTS: Among 1,029 serodiscordant couples, 311 agreed that they wanted children in the future (30%), 368 agreed they did not want children (36%), and 344 couples disagreed about having children (34%), with men more likely than women to want children. Women wanting child(ren) was associated with increased odds of baseline pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.93, 7.85)), fewer previous pregnancies (aOR = 0.85 per additional pregnancy (95% CI = 0.78, 0.93)), and partner fertility intention (aOR = 2.89 (95% CI = 2.14, 3.91)) adjusting for woman’s age, literacy, years cohabiting and HIV status. Men wanting child(ren) was associated with younger age (aOR = 0.96 per year (95% CI = 0.93, 0.99)), fewer years cohabiting (aOR = 0.95 (95% CI = 0.92, 0.98)), number of previous partners’ pregnancies (aOR = 0.90 (95% CI = 0.82, 0.98)), and partner fertility intention (aOR = 3.00 (95% CI = 2.21, 4.07)) adjusting for partner’s age, literacy, HIV status and partner’s baseline pregnancy. In adjusted survival analyses, HIV-negative women were more likely to seroconvert if they themselves wanted children (aHR = 2.36 (95% CI = 1.41, 3.96)) vs. did not want children, or if their partner wanted children (aHR = 2.34 (95% CI = 1.33, 4.11)) vs. did not want children, or if the couple agreed that they wanted children (aHR = 2.08 (95% CI = 1.01, 4.30)), adjusting for women’s age, women’s literacy, previous pregnancies and time in study. HIV-negative men were more likely to seroconvert if their female partner wanted a child in the next 12-months (aHR = 1.94 (95% CI = 1.02, 3.68)) vs. did not want children, and when both partners wanted children (aHR = 2.02 (CI = 1.09, 3.73)) vs. they did not want children, adjusting for men’s age and literacy, couple income, number of live children, male circumcision status and time in study. CONCLUSION: Women had increased risk of HIV acquisition if they and/or their partner wanted a child, while men had increased risk of HIV acquisition when their partner or if both partners agreed that they wanted children. Safer-conception interventions are needed to protect HIV uninfected women and men from HIV acquisition in HIV-serodiscordant couples who want children. Public Library of Science 2018-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5783339/ /pubmed/29364895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189869 Text en © 2018 Joseph Davey et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Joseph Davey, Dvora Leah
Wall, Kristin M.
Kilembe, William
Khu, Naw Htee
Brill, Ilene
Vwalika, Bellington
Chomba, Elwyn
Mulenga, Joseph
Tichacek, Amanda
Gorbach, Pamina M.
Allen, Susan
Difficult decisions: Evaluating individual and couple-level fertility intentions and HIV acquisition among HIV serodiscordant couples in Zambia
title Difficult decisions: Evaluating individual and couple-level fertility intentions and HIV acquisition among HIV serodiscordant couples in Zambia
title_full Difficult decisions: Evaluating individual and couple-level fertility intentions and HIV acquisition among HIV serodiscordant couples in Zambia
title_fullStr Difficult decisions: Evaluating individual and couple-level fertility intentions and HIV acquisition among HIV serodiscordant couples in Zambia
title_full_unstemmed Difficult decisions: Evaluating individual and couple-level fertility intentions and HIV acquisition among HIV serodiscordant couples in Zambia
title_short Difficult decisions: Evaluating individual and couple-level fertility intentions and HIV acquisition among HIV serodiscordant couples in Zambia
title_sort difficult decisions: evaluating individual and couple-level fertility intentions and hiv acquisition among hiv serodiscordant couples in zambia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5783339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189869
work_keys_str_mv AT josephdaveydvoraleah difficultdecisionsevaluatingindividualandcouplelevelfertilityintentionsandhivacquisitionamonghivserodiscordantcouplesinzambia
AT wallkristinm difficultdecisionsevaluatingindividualandcouplelevelfertilityintentionsandhivacquisitionamonghivserodiscordantcouplesinzambia
AT kilembewilliam difficultdecisionsevaluatingindividualandcouplelevelfertilityintentionsandhivacquisitionamonghivserodiscordantcouplesinzambia
AT khunawhtee difficultdecisionsevaluatingindividualandcouplelevelfertilityintentionsandhivacquisitionamonghivserodiscordantcouplesinzambia
AT brillilene difficultdecisionsevaluatingindividualandcouplelevelfertilityintentionsandhivacquisitionamonghivserodiscordantcouplesinzambia
AT vwalikabellington difficultdecisionsevaluatingindividualandcouplelevelfertilityintentionsandhivacquisitionamonghivserodiscordantcouplesinzambia
AT chombaelwyn difficultdecisionsevaluatingindividualandcouplelevelfertilityintentionsandhivacquisitionamonghivserodiscordantcouplesinzambia
AT mulengajoseph difficultdecisionsevaluatingindividualandcouplelevelfertilityintentionsandhivacquisitionamonghivserodiscordantcouplesinzambia
AT tichacekamanda difficultdecisionsevaluatingindividualandcouplelevelfertilityintentionsandhivacquisitionamonghivserodiscordantcouplesinzambia
AT gorbachpaminam difficultdecisionsevaluatingindividualandcouplelevelfertilityintentionsandhivacquisitionamonghivserodiscordantcouplesinzambia
AT allensusan difficultdecisionsevaluatingindividualandcouplelevelfertilityintentionsandhivacquisitionamonghivserodiscordantcouplesinzambia