Cargando…

Bias due to differential participation in case-control studies and review of available approaches for adjustment

OBJECTIVES: Low response rates in epidemiologic research potentially lead to the recruitment of a non-representative sample of controls in case-control studies. Problems in the unbiased estimation of odds ratios arise when characteristics causing the probability of participation are associated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aigner, Annette, Grittner, Ulrike, Becher, Heiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5783376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191327
_version_ 1783295263617581056
author Aigner, Annette
Grittner, Ulrike
Becher, Heiko
author_facet Aigner, Annette
Grittner, Ulrike
Becher, Heiko
author_sort Aigner, Annette
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Low response rates in epidemiologic research potentially lead to the recruitment of a non-representative sample of controls in case-control studies. Problems in the unbiased estimation of odds ratios arise when characteristics causing the probability of participation are associated with exposure and outcome. This is a specific setting of selection bias and a realistic hazard in many case-control studies. This paper formally describes the problem and shows its potential extent, reviews existing approaches for bias adjustment applicable under certain conditions, compares and applies them. METHODS: We focus on two scenarios: a characteristic C causing differential participation of controls is linked to the outcome through its association with risk factor E (scenario I), and C is additionally a genuine risk factor itself (scenario II). We further assume external data sources are available which provide an unbiased estimate of C in the underlying population. Given these scenarios, we (i) review available approaches and their performance in the setting of bias due to differential participation; (ii) describe two existing approaches to correct for the bias in both scenarios in more detail; (iii) present the magnitude of the resulting bias by simulation if the selection of a non-representative sample is ignored; and (iv) demonstrate the approaches’ application via data from a case-control study on stroke. FINDINGS: The bias of the effect measure for variable E in scenario I and C in scenario II can be large and should therefore be adjusted for in any analysis. It is positively associated with the difference in response rates between groups of the characteristic causing differential participation, and inversely associated with the total response rate in the controls. Adjustment in a standard logistic regression framework is possible in both scenarios if the population distribution of the characteristic causing differential participation is known or can be approximated well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5783376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57833762018-02-08 Bias due to differential participation in case-control studies and review of available approaches for adjustment Aigner, Annette Grittner, Ulrike Becher, Heiko PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Low response rates in epidemiologic research potentially lead to the recruitment of a non-representative sample of controls in case-control studies. Problems in the unbiased estimation of odds ratios arise when characteristics causing the probability of participation are associated with exposure and outcome. This is a specific setting of selection bias and a realistic hazard in many case-control studies. This paper formally describes the problem and shows its potential extent, reviews existing approaches for bias adjustment applicable under certain conditions, compares and applies them. METHODS: We focus on two scenarios: a characteristic C causing differential participation of controls is linked to the outcome through its association with risk factor E (scenario I), and C is additionally a genuine risk factor itself (scenario II). We further assume external data sources are available which provide an unbiased estimate of C in the underlying population. Given these scenarios, we (i) review available approaches and their performance in the setting of bias due to differential participation; (ii) describe two existing approaches to correct for the bias in both scenarios in more detail; (iii) present the magnitude of the resulting bias by simulation if the selection of a non-representative sample is ignored; and (iv) demonstrate the approaches’ application via data from a case-control study on stroke. FINDINGS: The bias of the effect measure for variable E in scenario I and C in scenario II can be large and should therefore be adjusted for in any analysis. It is positively associated with the difference in response rates between groups of the characteristic causing differential participation, and inversely associated with the total response rate in the controls. Adjustment in a standard logistic regression framework is possible in both scenarios if the population distribution of the characteristic causing differential participation is known or can be approximated well. Public Library of Science 2018-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5783376/ /pubmed/29364926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191327 Text en © 2018 Aigner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aigner, Annette
Grittner, Ulrike
Becher, Heiko
Bias due to differential participation in case-control studies and review of available approaches for adjustment
title Bias due to differential participation in case-control studies and review of available approaches for adjustment
title_full Bias due to differential participation in case-control studies and review of available approaches for adjustment
title_fullStr Bias due to differential participation in case-control studies and review of available approaches for adjustment
title_full_unstemmed Bias due to differential participation in case-control studies and review of available approaches for adjustment
title_short Bias due to differential participation in case-control studies and review of available approaches for adjustment
title_sort bias due to differential participation in case-control studies and review of available approaches for adjustment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5783376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191327
work_keys_str_mv AT aignerannette biasduetodifferentialparticipationincasecontrolstudiesandreviewofavailableapproachesforadjustment
AT grittnerulrike biasduetodifferentialparticipationincasecontrolstudiesandreviewofavailableapproachesforadjustment
AT becherheiko biasduetodifferentialparticipationincasecontrolstudiesandreviewofavailableapproachesforadjustment