Cargando…

Systematic evaluation of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel patient-responder characteristics

Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG, carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension in the United States) is a treatment option for advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with motor fluctuations. The objective of this investigation was to identify the baseline characteristics predictive of treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Standaert, David G., Boyd, James T., Odin, Per, Robieson, Weining Z., Zamudio, Jorge, Chatamra, Krai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29387783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41531-017-0040-2
_version_ 1783295383731961856
author Standaert, David G.
Boyd, James T.
Odin, Per
Robieson, Weining Z.
Zamudio, Jorge
Chatamra, Krai
author_facet Standaert, David G.
Boyd, James T.
Odin, Per
Robieson, Weining Z.
Zamudio, Jorge
Chatamra, Krai
author_sort Standaert, David G.
collection PubMed
description Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG, carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension in the United States) is a treatment option for advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with motor fluctuations. The objective of this investigation was to identify the baseline characteristics predictive of treatment response, measured by improvement in motor symptom severity, in advanced PD patients treated with LCIG during a 54-week, open-label phase 3 study. Patients with ≥1 h improvement from baseline in “Off” time were categorized as “Responders”; whereas those with <1 h improvement, any worsening, or no post-baseline assessment were “Non-Responders”. A subgroup of Responders with ≥3 h improvement in “Off” time was also examined; this subgroup was identified as “Robust Responders”. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were analyzed and their predictive relationship to change from baseline in normalized “Off” time was assessed. Out of the 324 patients included in the analysis, 272 (84.0%) were categorized as Responders and 52 (16.0%) were Non-Responders. A majority of patients (65.7%) had ≥3 h improvement in “Off” time. In general, baseline characteristics were similar between Non-responders, Responders, and the subgroup of Robust Responders. A conditional tree-structured regression analysis identified baseline “Off” time as the only factor that had significant effect on Responder and Robust Responder status. The safety profile of LCIG was similar between patient groups. Overall, this analysis showed that 84% of LCIG-treated advanced PD patients had ≥1 h improvement in “Off” time and the number-needed-to-treat to observe one patient responder was 1.19 patients. Notably, Responders and Robust Responders to LCIG were observed across the range of baseline demographics and clinical characteristics examined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5784118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57841182018-01-31 Systematic evaluation of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel patient-responder characteristics Standaert, David G. Boyd, James T. Odin, Per Robieson, Weining Z. Zamudio, Jorge Chatamra, Krai NPJ Parkinsons Dis Article Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG, carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension in the United States) is a treatment option for advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with motor fluctuations. The objective of this investigation was to identify the baseline characteristics predictive of treatment response, measured by improvement in motor symptom severity, in advanced PD patients treated with LCIG during a 54-week, open-label phase 3 study. Patients with ≥1 h improvement from baseline in “Off” time were categorized as “Responders”; whereas those with <1 h improvement, any worsening, or no post-baseline assessment were “Non-Responders”. A subgroup of Responders with ≥3 h improvement in “Off” time was also examined; this subgroup was identified as “Robust Responders”. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were analyzed and their predictive relationship to change from baseline in normalized “Off” time was assessed. Out of the 324 patients included in the analysis, 272 (84.0%) were categorized as Responders and 52 (16.0%) were Non-Responders. A majority of patients (65.7%) had ≥3 h improvement in “Off” time. In general, baseline characteristics were similar between Non-responders, Responders, and the subgroup of Robust Responders. A conditional tree-structured regression analysis identified baseline “Off” time as the only factor that had significant effect on Responder and Robust Responder status. The safety profile of LCIG was similar between patient groups. Overall, this analysis showed that 84% of LCIG-treated advanced PD patients had ≥1 h improvement in “Off” time and the number-needed-to-treat to observe one patient responder was 1.19 patients. Notably, Responders and Robust Responders to LCIG were observed across the range of baseline demographics and clinical characteristics examined. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5784118/ /pubmed/29387783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41531-017-0040-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Standaert, David G.
Boyd, James T.
Odin, Per
Robieson, Weining Z.
Zamudio, Jorge
Chatamra, Krai
Systematic evaluation of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel patient-responder characteristics
title Systematic evaluation of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel patient-responder characteristics
title_full Systematic evaluation of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel patient-responder characteristics
title_fullStr Systematic evaluation of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel patient-responder characteristics
title_full_unstemmed Systematic evaluation of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel patient-responder characteristics
title_short Systematic evaluation of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel patient-responder characteristics
title_sort systematic evaluation of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel patient-responder characteristics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29387783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41531-017-0040-2
work_keys_str_mv AT standaertdavidg systematicevaluationoflevodopacarbidopaintestinalgelpatientrespondercharacteristics
AT boydjamest systematicevaluationoflevodopacarbidopaintestinalgelpatientrespondercharacteristics
AT odinper systematicevaluationoflevodopacarbidopaintestinalgelpatientrespondercharacteristics
AT robiesonweiningz systematicevaluationoflevodopacarbidopaintestinalgelpatientrespondercharacteristics
AT zamudiojorge systematicevaluationoflevodopacarbidopaintestinalgelpatientrespondercharacteristics
AT chatamrakrai systematicevaluationoflevodopacarbidopaintestinalgelpatientrespondercharacteristics