Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Women With Notable Subjective Health Indicators Compared With Participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health: Cross-Sectional Survey
BACKGROUND: At least six communities with unusually good health and longevity have been identified, but their lifestyles aren’t adopted widely. Informal evidence suggests that women associated with Universal Medicine (UM), a complementary medicine health care organization in Eastern Australia and th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321123 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.9490 |
_version_ | 1783295399390347264 |
---|---|
author | Schnelle, Christoph Minford, Eunice J McHardy, Vanessa Keep, Jane |
author_facet | Schnelle, Christoph Minford, Eunice J McHardy, Vanessa Keep, Jane |
author_sort | Schnelle, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: At least six communities with unusually good health and longevity have been identified, but their lifestyles aren’t adopted widely. Informal evidence suggests that women associated with Universal Medicine (UM), a complementary medicine health care organization in Eastern Australia and the United Kingdom with normal lifestyles, also have several unusual health indicators. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine how UM participants compared with women in the Australian population at large on a variety of health indicators. METHODS: In an Internet survey conducted July to September 2015, a total of 449 female UM participants from 15 countries responded to 43 health indicator questions taken from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH). RESULTS: Survey responses revealed large positive differences in mental and physical health when compared with the ALSWH respondents, except for abnormal Pap test and low iron history. Differences and corresponding effect size estimates (Cohen d; ≥0.8 is a high difference, ≥0.5 a medium and ≥0.2 a small one with P<.001 except where indicated) included body mass index (BMI; 1.11), stress level (0.20, P=.006), depression (0.44), summary physical (0.31) and mental health (0.37), general mental health (0.39), emotional (0.15, P=.009) and social functioning (0.22), vitality (0.58), and general health (0.49), as well as lower incidences of diabetes, hypertension, and thrombosis (P<.001 each). Neither education levels nor country of residence had predictive value. Age did not predict BMI. CONCLUSIONS: The women’s responses notably claim substantially lower levels of illness and disease than in the general Australian population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12617000972325; https://www.anzctr. org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373120&isReview=true (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/ 6wEDDn45O) INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR2-10.2196/7993 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5784184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57841842018-01-31 Comparative Analysis of Women With Notable Subjective Health Indicators Compared With Participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health: Cross-Sectional Survey Schnelle, Christoph Minford, Eunice J McHardy, Vanessa Keep, Jane JMIR Public Health Surveill Original Paper BACKGROUND: At least six communities with unusually good health and longevity have been identified, but their lifestyles aren’t adopted widely. Informal evidence suggests that women associated with Universal Medicine (UM), a complementary medicine health care organization in Eastern Australia and the United Kingdom with normal lifestyles, also have several unusual health indicators. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine how UM participants compared with women in the Australian population at large on a variety of health indicators. METHODS: In an Internet survey conducted July to September 2015, a total of 449 female UM participants from 15 countries responded to 43 health indicator questions taken from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH). RESULTS: Survey responses revealed large positive differences in mental and physical health when compared with the ALSWH respondents, except for abnormal Pap test and low iron history. Differences and corresponding effect size estimates (Cohen d; ≥0.8 is a high difference, ≥0.5 a medium and ≥0.2 a small one with P<.001 except where indicated) included body mass index (BMI; 1.11), stress level (0.20, P=.006), depression (0.44), summary physical (0.31) and mental health (0.37), general mental health (0.39), emotional (0.15, P=.009) and social functioning (0.22), vitality (0.58), and general health (0.49), as well as lower incidences of diabetes, hypertension, and thrombosis (P<.001 each). Neither education levels nor country of residence had predictive value. Age did not predict BMI. CONCLUSIONS: The women’s responses notably claim substantially lower levels of illness and disease than in the general Australian population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12617000972325; https://www.anzctr. org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373120&isReview=true (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/ 6wEDDn45O) INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR2-10.2196/7993 JMIR Publications 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5784184/ /pubmed/29321123 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.9490 Text en ©Christoph Schnelle, Eunice J Minford, Vanessa McHardy, Jane Keep. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 10.01.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Schnelle, Christoph Minford, Eunice J McHardy, Vanessa Keep, Jane Comparative Analysis of Women With Notable Subjective Health Indicators Compared With Participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health: Cross-Sectional Survey |
title | Comparative Analysis of Women With Notable Subjective Health Indicators Compared With Participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health: Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Women With Notable Subjective Health Indicators Compared With Participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health: Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Women With Notable Subjective Health Indicators Compared With Participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health: Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Women With Notable Subjective Health Indicators Compared With Participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health: Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Women With Notable Subjective Health Indicators Compared With Participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health: Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_sort | comparative analysis of women with notable subjective health indicators compared with participants in the australian longitudinal study on women’s health: cross-sectional survey |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321123 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.9490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schnellechristoph comparativeanalysisofwomenwithnotablesubjectivehealthindicatorscomparedwithparticipantsintheaustralianlongitudinalstudyonwomenshealthcrosssectionalsurvey AT minfordeunicej comparativeanalysisofwomenwithnotablesubjectivehealthindicatorscomparedwithparticipantsintheaustralianlongitudinalstudyonwomenshealthcrosssectionalsurvey AT mchardyvanessa comparativeanalysisofwomenwithnotablesubjectivehealthindicatorscomparedwithparticipantsintheaustralianlongitudinalstudyonwomenshealthcrosssectionalsurvey AT keepjane comparativeanalysisofwomenwithnotablesubjectivehealthindicatorscomparedwithparticipantsintheaustralianlongitudinalstudyonwomenshealthcrosssectionalsurvey |