Cargando…

Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review

Screening newborns for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry is recommended to allow for the prompt diagnosis and prevention of life-threatening crises. The present review summarizes and critiques six previously published estimates of the costs or cost-effectiveness of CCHD s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grosse, Scott D., Peterson, Cora, Abouk, Rahi, Glidewell, Jill, Oster, Matthew E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29376140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns3040034
_version_ 1783295402228842496
author Grosse, Scott D.
Peterson, Cora
Abouk, Rahi
Glidewell, Jill
Oster, Matthew E.
author_facet Grosse, Scott D.
Peterson, Cora
Abouk, Rahi
Glidewell, Jill
Oster, Matthew E.
author_sort Grosse, Scott D.
collection PubMed
description Screening newborns for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry is recommended to allow for the prompt diagnosis and prevention of life-threatening crises. The present review summarizes and critiques six previously published estimates of the costs or cost-effectiveness of CCHD screening from the United Kingdom, United States, and China. Several elements that affect CCHD screening costs were assessed in varying numbers of studies, including screening staff time, instrumentation, and consumables, as well as costs of diagnosis and treatment. A previous US study that used conservative assumptions suggested that CCHD screening is likely to be considered cost-effective from the healthcare sector perspective. Newly available estimates of avoided infant CCHD deaths in several US states that implemented mandatory CCHD screening policies during 2011–2013 suggest a substantially larger reduction in deaths than was projected in the previous US cost-effectiveness analysis. Taking into account these new estimates, we estimate that cost per life-year gained could be as low as USD 12,000. However, that estimate does not take into account future costs of health care and education for surviving children with CCHD nor the costs incurred by health departments to support and monitor CCHD screening policies and programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5784211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57842112018-01-25 Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review Grosse, Scott D. Peterson, Cora Abouk, Rahi Glidewell, Jill Oster, Matthew E. Int J Neonatal Screen Article Screening newborns for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry is recommended to allow for the prompt diagnosis and prevention of life-threatening crises. The present review summarizes and critiques six previously published estimates of the costs or cost-effectiveness of CCHD screening from the United Kingdom, United States, and China. Several elements that affect CCHD screening costs were assessed in varying numbers of studies, including screening staff time, instrumentation, and consumables, as well as costs of diagnosis and treatment. A previous US study that used conservative assumptions suggested that CCHD screening is likely to be considered cost-effective from the healthcare sector perspective. Newly available estimates of avoided infant CCHD deaths in several US states that implemented mandatory CCHD screening policies during 2011–2013 suggest a substantially larger reduction in deaths than was projected in the previous US cost-effectiveness analysis. Taking into account these new estimates, we estimate that cost per life-year gained could be as low as USD 12,000. However, that estimate does not take into account future costs of health care and education for surviving children with CCHD nor the costs incurred by health departments to support and monitor CCHD screening policies and programs. 2017-12-14 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5784211/ /pubmed/29376140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns3040034 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Grosse, Scott D.
Peterson, Cora
Abouk, Rahi
Glidewell, Jill
Oster, Matthew E.
Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review
title Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review
title_full Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review
title_fullStr Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review
title_short Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review
title_sort cost and cost-effectiveness assessments of newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease using pulse oximetry: a review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29376140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns3040034
work_keys_str_mv AT grossescottd costandcosteffectivenessassessmentsofnewbornscreeningforcriticalcongenitalheartdiseaseusingpulseoximetryareview
AT petersoncora costandcosteffectivenessassessmentsofnewbornscreeningforcriticalcongenitalheartdiseaseusingpulseoximetryareview
AT aboukrahi costandcosteffectivenessassessmentsofnewbornscreeningforcriticalcongenitalheartdiseaseusingpulseoximetryareview
AT glidewelljill costandcosteffectivenessassessmentsofnewbornscreeningforcriticalcongenitalheartdiseaseusingpulseoximetryareview
AT ostermatthewe costandcosteffectivenessassessmentsofnewbornscreeningforcriticalcongenitalheartdiseaseusingpulseoximetryareview