Cargando…
Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review
Screening newborns for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry is recommended to allow for the prompt diagnosis and prevention of life-threatening crises. The present review summarizes and critiques six previously published estimates of the costs or cost-effectiveness of CCHD s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29376140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns3040034 |
_version_ | 1783295402228842496 |
---|---|
author | Grosse, Scott D. Peterson, Cora Abouk, Rahi Glidewell, Jill Oster, Matthew E. |
author_facet | Grosse, Scott D. Peterson, Cora Abouk, Rahi Glidewell, Jill Oster, Matthew E. |
author_sort | Grosse, Scott D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Screening newborns for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry is recommended to allow for the prompt diagnosis and prevention of life-threatening crises. The present review summarizes and critiques six previously published estimates of the costs or cost-effectiveness of CCHD screening from the United Kingdom, United States, and China. Several elements that affect CCHD screening costs were assessed in varying numbers of studies, including screening staff time, instrumentation, and consumables, as well as costs of diagnosis and treatment. A previous US study that used conservative assumptions suggested that CCHD screening is likely to be considered cost-effective from the healthcare sector perspective. Newly available estimates of avoided infant CCHD deaths in several US states that implemented mandatory CCHD screening policies during 2011–2013 suggest a substantially larger reduction in deaths than was projected in the previous US cost-effectiveness analysis. Taking into account these new estimates, we estimate that cost per life-year gained could be as low as USD 12,000. However, that estimate does not take into account future costs of health care and education for surviving children with CCHD nor the costs incurred by health departments to support and monitor CCHD screening policies and programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5784211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57842112018-01-25 Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review Grosse, Scott D. Peterson, Cora Abouk, Rahi Glidewell, Jill Oster, Matthew E. Int J Neonatal Screen Article Screening newborns for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry is recommended to allow for the prompt diagnosis and prevention of life-threatening crises. The present review summarizes and critiques six previously published estimates of the costs or cost-effectiveness of CCHD screening from the United Kingdom, United States, and China. Several elements that affect CCHD screening costs were assessed in varying numbers of studies, including screening staff time, instrumentation, and consumables, as well as costs of diagnosis and treatment. A previous US study that used conservative assumptions suggested that CCHD screening is likely to be considered cost-effective from the healthcare sector perspective. Newly available estimates of avoided infant CCHD deaths in several US states that implemented mandatory CCHD screening policies during 2011–2013 suggest a substantially larger reduction in deaths than was projected in the previous US cost-effectiveness analysis. Taking into account these new estimates, we estimate that cost per life-year gained could be as low as USD 12,000. However, that estimate does not take into account future costs of health care and education for surviving children with CCHD nor the costs incurred by health departments to support and monitor CCHD screening policies and programs. 2017-12-14 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5784211/ /pubmed/29376140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns3040034 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Grosse, Scott D. Peterson, Cora Abouk, Rahi Glidewell, Jill Oster, Matthew E. Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review |
title | Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review |
title_full | Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review |
title_fullStr | Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review |
title_short | Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review |
title_sort | cost and cost-effectiveness assessments of newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease using pulse oximetry: a review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29376140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns3040034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grossescottd costandcosteffectivenessassessmentsofnewbornscreeningforcriticalcongenitalheartdiseaseusingpulseoximetryareview AT petersoncora costandcosteffectivenessassessmentsofnewbornscreeningforcriticalcongenitalheartdiseaseusingpulseoximetryareview AT aboukrahi costandcosteffectivenessassessmentsofnewbornscreeningforcriticalcongenitalheartdiseaseusingpulseoximetryareview AT glidewelljill costandcosteffectivenessassessmentsofnewbornscreeningforcriticalcongenitalheartdiseaseusingpulseoximetryareview AT ostermatthewe costandcosteffectivenessassessmentsofnewbornscreeningforcriticalcongenitalheartdiseaseusingpulseoximetryareview |