Cargando…
A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage
PURPOSE: Lithium (Li) is a well-established drug for the treatment of bipolar affective disorders. Li as a drug is known to possess a narrow therapeutic index. Thus, regular monitoring of blood Li in patients receiving Li therapy is essential. Plain tubes with clot activator are known to interfere w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403206 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JLP.JLP_78_17 |
_version_ | 1783295420265398272 |
---|---|
author | Ikkurthi, Saidaiah Balachander, Srinivas Goyal, Bela Mir, Altaf Ahmad Chakrabarti, Subho Pal, Arnab |
author_facet | Ikkurthi, Saidaiah Balachander, Srinivas Goyal, Bela Mir, Altaf Ahmad Chakrabarti, Subho Pal, Arnab |
author_sort | Ikkurthi, Saidaiah |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Lithium (Li) is a well-established drug for the treatment of bipolar affective disorders. Li as a drug is known to possess a narrow therapeutic index. Thus, regular monitoring of blood Li in patients receiving Li therapy is essential. Plain tubes with clot activator are known to interfere with Li estimation. The current study was planned to compare Li estimation in sera from vacutainers with clot activator, and plasma from sodium heparinized vacutainers with that of Li estimation in sera from glass vials. The time-dependant stability of Li estimation on storage at 2°C–8°C for 48 h in these three set of tubes was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood from the patients on Li therapy (n = 100) was collected in 3 different collection tubes: plain vacutainer with clot activator (S), Sodium heparinized vacutainer (P) and Glass vial (G) and was analyzed by ion selective electrode (ISE) analyzer for Li levels. Secondary aliquots were also taken from each type of collection tube and stored at 2°C–8°C. Time-dependant stability of Li estimation was checked at 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h. ANOVA followed by Tukey's posttest was performed to calculate statistical significance taking glass vial as reference collection tube. Bland–Altman plots were plotted to compare between three collection tubes at baseline. Stability on storage was defined when >95% of the samples were within allowable error limit for that time point taking baseline levels as reference. RESULTS: A mean bias of 0.18 mmol/L and mean percentage bias of 19.9% in Li levels was observed between serum from (S) than serum from (G). This difference was found to be statistically significant. However, statistically nonsignificant mean bias of 0.02 mmol/L and mean percentage bias of 3.34% in Li levels was observed between plasma from (P) and serum from (G). Time-dependant stability was observed more in glass vials as compared to vacutainers with clot activator or sodium heparin. CONCLUSION: Serum from glass vial should be the preferred method for blood collection to determine Li levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5784294 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57842942018-02-05 A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage Ikkurthi, Saidaiah Balachander, Srinivas Goyal, Bela Mir, Altaf Ahmad Chakrabarti, Subho Pal, Arnab J Lab Physicians Original Article PURPOSE: Lithium (Li) is a well-established drug for the treatment of bipolar affective disorders. Li as a drug is known to possess a narrow therapeutic index. Thus, regular monitoring of blood Li in patients receiving Li therapy is essential. Plain tubes with clot activator are known to interfere with Li estimation. The current study was planned to compare Li estimation in sera from vacutainers with clot activator, and plasma from sodium heparinized vacutainers with that of Li estimation in sera from glass vials. The time-dependant stability of Li estimation on storage at 2°C–8°C for 48 h in these three set of tubes was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood from the patients on Li therapy (n = 100) was collected in 3 different collection tubes: plain vacutainer with clot activator (S), Sodium heparinized vacutainer (P) and Glass vial (G) and was analyzed by ion selective electrode (ISE) analyzer for Li levels. Secondary aliquots were also taken from each type of collection tube and stored at 2°C–8°C. Time-dependant stability of Li estimation was checked at 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h. ANOVA followed by Tukey's posttest was performed to calculate statistical significance taking glass vial as reference collection tube. Bland–Altman plots were plotted to compare between three collection tubes at baseline. Stability on storage was defined when >95% of the samples were within allowable error limit for that time point taking baseline levels as reference. RESULTS: A mean bias of 0.18 mmol/L and mean percentage bias of 19.9% in Li levels was observed between serum from (S) than serum from (G). This difference was found to be statistically significant. However, statistically nonsignificant mean bias of 0.02 mmol/L and mean percentage bias of 3.34% in Li levels was observed between plasma from (P) and serum from (G). Time-dependant stability was observed more in glass vials as compared to vacutainers with clot activator or sodium heparin. CONCLUSION: Serum from glass vial should be the preferred method for blood collection to determine Li levels. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5784294/ /pubmed/29403206 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JLP.JLP_78_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Laboratory Physicians http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ikkurthi, Saidaiah Balachander, Srinivas Goyal, Bela Mir, Altaf Ahmad Chakrabarti, Subho Pal, Arnab A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage |
title | A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage |
title_full | A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage |
title_fullStr | A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage |
title_short | A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403206 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JLP.JLP_78_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ikkurthisaidaiah acomparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage AT balachandersrinivas acomparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage AT goyalbela acomparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage AT miraltafahmad acomparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage AT chakrabartisubho acomparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage AT palarnab acomparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage AT ikkurthisaidaiah comparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage AT balachandersrinivas comparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage AT goyalbela comparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage AT miraltafahmad comparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage AT chakrabartisubho comparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage AT palarnab comparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage |