Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage

PURPOSE: Lithium (Li) is a well-established drug for the treatment of bipolar affective disorders. Li as a drug is known to possess a narrow therapeutic index. Thus, regular monitoring of blood Li in patients receiving Li therapy is essential. Plain tubes with clot activator are known to interfere w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ikkurthi, Saidaiah, Balachander, Srinivas, Goyal, Bela, Mir, Altaf Ahmad, Chakrabarti, Subho, Pal, Arnab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403206
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JLP.JLP_78_17
_version_ 1783295420265398272
author Ikkurthi, Saidaiah
Balachander, Srinivas
Goyal, Bela
Mir, Altaf Ahmad
Chakrabarti, Subho
Pal, Arnab
author_facet Ikkurthi, Saidaiah
Balachander, Srinivas
Goyal, Bela
Mir, Altaf Ahmad
Chakrabarti, Subho
Pal, Arnab
author_sort Ikkurthi, Saidaiah
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Lithium (Li) is a well-established drug for the treatment of bipolar affective disorders. Li as a drug is known to possess a narrow therapeutic index. Thus, regular monitoring of blood Li in patients receiving Li therapy is essential. Plain tubes with clot activator are known to interfere with Li estimation. The current study was planned to compare Li estimation in sera from vacutainers with clot activator, and plasma from sodium heparinized vacutainers with that of Li estimation in sera from glass vials. The time-dependant stability of Li estimation on storage at 2°C–8°C for 48 h in these three set of tubes was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood from the patients on Li therapy (n = 100) was collected in 3 different collection tubes: plain vacutainer with clot activator (S), Sodium heparinized vacutainer (P) and Glass vial (G) and was analyzed by ion selective electrode (ISE) analyzer for Li levels. Secondary aliquots were also taken from each type of collection tube and stored at 2°C–8°C. Time-dependant stability of Li estimation was checked at 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h. ANOVA followed by Tukey's posttest was performed to calculate statistical significance taking glass vial as reference collection tube. Bland–Altman plots were plotted to compare between three collection tubes at baseline. Stability on storage was defined when >95% of the samples were within allowable error limit for that time point taking baseline levels as reference. RESULTS: A mean bias of 0.18 mmol/L and mean percentage bias of 19.9% in Li levels was observed between serum from (S) than serum from (G). This difference was found to be statistically significant. However, statistically nonsignificant mean bias of 0.02 mmol/L and mean percentage bias of 3.34% in Li levels was observed between plasma from (P) and serum from (G). Time-dependant stability was observed more in glass vials as compared to vacutainers with clot activator or sodium heparin. CONCLUSION: Serum from glass vial should be the preferred method for blood collection to determine Li levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5784294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57842942018-02-05 A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage Ikkurthi, Saidaiah Balachander, Srinivas Goyal, Bela Mir, Altaf Ahmad Chakrabarti, Subho Pal, Arnab J Lab Physicians Original Article PURPOSE: Lithium (Li) is a well-established drug for the treatment of bipolar affective disorders. Li as a drug is known to possess a narrow therapeutic index. Thus, regular monitoring of blood Li in patients receiving Li therapy is essential. Plain tubes with clot activator are known to interfere with Li estimation. The current study was planned to compare Li estimation in sera from vacutainers with clot activator, and plasma from sodium heparinized vacutainers with that of Li estimation in sera from glass vials. The time-dependant stability of Li estimation on storage at 2°C–8°C for 48 h in these three set of tubes was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood from the patients on Li therapy (n = 100) was collected in 3 different collection tubes: plain vacutainer with clot activator (S), Sodium heparinized vacutainer (P) and Glass vial (G) and was analyzed by ion selective electrode (ISE) analyzer for Li levels. Secondary aliquots were also taken from each type of collection tube and stored at 2°C–8°C. Time-dependant stability of Li estimation was checked at 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h. ANOVA followed by Tukey's posttest was performed to calculate statistical significance taking glass vial as reference collection tube. Bland–Altman plots were plotted to compare between three collection tubes at baseline. Stability on storage was defined when >95% of the samples were within allowable error limit for that time point taking baseline levels as reference. RESULTS: A mean bias of 0.18 mmol/L and mean percentage bias of 19.9% in Li levels was observed between serum from (S) than serum from (G). This difference was found to be statistically significant. However, statistically nonsignificant mean bias of 0.02 mmol/L and mean percentage bias of 3.34% in Li levels was observed between plasma from (P) and serum from (G). Time-dependant stability was observed more in glass vials as compared to vacutainers with clot activator or sodium heparin. CONCLUSION: Serum from glass vial should be the preferred method for blood collection to determine Li levels. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5784294/ /pubmed/29403206 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JLP.JLP_78_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Laboratory Physicians http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ikkurthi, Saidaiah
Balachander, Srinivas
Goyal, Bela
Mir, Altaf Ahmad
Chakrabarti, Subho
Pal, Arnab
A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage
title A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage
title_full A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage
title_short A comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage
title_sort comparative evaluation of lithium estimation for samples collected in different tubes and its stability on storage
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403206
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JLP.JLP_78_17
work_keys_str_mv AT ikkurthisaidaiah acomparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage
AT balachandersrinivas acomparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage
AT goyalbela acomparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage
AT miraltafahmad acomparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage
AT chakrabartisubho acomparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage
AT palarnab acomparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage
AT ikkurthisaidaiah comparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage
AT balachandersrinivas comparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage
AT goyalbela comparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage
AT miraltafahmad comparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage
AT chakrabartisubho comparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage
AT palarnab comparativeevaluationoflithiumestimationforsamplescollectedindifferenttubesanditsstabilityonstorage