Cargando…
Comparison of airway dimensions in skeletal Class I malocclusion subjects with different vertical facial patterns
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare upper airway widths among skeletal Class I malocclusion subjects with different vertical facial patterns. METHODS: The sample included a total of 99 lateral cephalograms of post pubertal individuals (18.19 ± 1.76 years old). The vertical facial pattern...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.6.035-042.oar |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare upper airway widths among skeletal Class I malocclusion subjects with different vertical facial patterns. METHODS: The sample included a total of 99 lateral cephalograms of post pubertal individuals (18.19 ± 1.76 years old). The vertical facial pattern was determined by the Vert index. The McNamara method was used to quantify upper airway widths. ANOVA test and Student’s t test for independent groups were used, when normal distribution was not supported Kruskal-Wallis test and U-Mann-Whitney test were used. A multiple linear regression analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in several nasopharyngeal widths were found among the distinct vertical facial patterns. Subjects with brachyfacial pattern presented larger nasopharyngeal widths than subjects with mesofacial (p= 0.030) or dolichofacial (p= 0.034) patterns. The larger the Vert value, the larger the nasopharyngeal widths (R(2)= 26.2%, p< 0.001). At the level of oropharynx no statistically significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that nasopharyngeal linear anteroposterior widths in Class I malocclusion brachyfacial are larger than in mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals. The Vert index only explained 25% of the total variability. No correlation was found for the oropharyngeal widths. |
---|