Cargando…
A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft
Our aim was to compare the process of bone formation after reconstruction of the vertebral body using a titanium cage with either a liquid nitrogen-treated (frozen) bone autograft or non-treated fresh bone autograft. Twelve canine beagles underwent anterior reconstruction of the 5(th) lumbar vertebr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29370240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191679 |
_version_ | 1783295538800623616 |
---|---|
author | Shinmura, Kazuya Murakami, Hideki Demura, Satoru Kato, Satoshi Yoshioka, Katsuhito Hayashi, Hiroyuki Inoue, Kei Ota, Takashi Yokogawa, Noriaki Ishii, Takayoshi Igarashi, Takashi Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki |
author_facet | Shinmura, Kazuya Murakami, Hideki Demura, Satoru Kato, Satoshi Yoshioka, Katsuhito Hayashi, Hiroyuki Inoue, Kei Ota, Takashi Yokogawa, Noriaki Ishii, Takayoshi Igarashi, Takashi Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki |
author_sort | Shinmura, Kazuya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our aim was to compare the process of bone formation after reconstruction of the vertebral body using a titanium cage with either a liquid nitrogen-treated (frozen) bone autograft or non-treated fresh bone autograft. Twelve canine beagles underwent anterior reconstruction of the 5(th) lumbar vertebrae using a titanium cage and bone autograft. Bone formation was compared across four experimental groups: fresh bone autograft groups, with animals sacrificed at either 8 or 16 weeks post-reconstruction, and liquid nitrogen-treated (frozen) bone autograft groups, with animals again sacrificed at either 8 or 16 weeks post-reconstruction. Bone formation was evaluated histologically by calculating the proportion of ‘reaction’ and ‘mature bone’ regions at the ends of the cage, its center, and ventral/dorsal sides. The reaction region contained osteocytes with a nucleus and osteoblasts accumulated on the surface of an osteoid, while a laminar structure was visible for mature bone regions. For fresh bone autografts, the reaction and mature bone regions significantly increased from 8 to 16 weeks post-reconstruction. By comparison, for frozen autografts, the reaction bone region did not significantly increase from 8 to 16 weeks post-reconstruction, while the mature bone region did increase over this time period. The proportion of reaction bone was higher at the ends and dorsal side of the cage at 8 weeks, for both graft types, with greater bone formation at the center of the cage at 16 weeks only for the fresh bone autograft. Therefore, bone formation in the anterior spinal reconstruction site tended to be delayed when using a frozen bone autograft compared to a fresh bone autograft. The bone formation process, however, was similar for both groups, beginning at the ends and dorsal side of the cage adjacent to the surrounding vertebral bone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5784937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57849372018-02-09 A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft Shinmura, Kazuya Murakami, Hideki Demura, Satoru Kato, Satoshi Yoshioka, Katsuhito Hayashi, Hiroyuki Inoue, Kei Ota, Takashi Yokogawa, Noriaki Ishii, Takayoshi Igarashi, Takashi Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki PLoS One Research Article Our aim was to compare the process of bone formation after reconstruction of the vertebral body using a titanium cage with either a liquid nitrogen-treated (frozen) bone autograft or non-treated fresh bone autograft. Twelve canine beagles underwent anterior reconstruction of the 5(th) lumbar vertebrae using a titanium cage and bone autograft. Bone formation was compared across four experimental groups: fresh bone autograft groups, with animals sacrificed at either 8 or 16 weeks post-reconstruction, and liquid nitrogen-treated (frozen) bone autograft groups, with animals again sacrificed at either 8 or 16 weeks post-reconstruction. Bone formation was evaluated histologically by calculating the proportion of ‘reaction’ and ‘mature bone’ regions at the ends of the cage, its center, and ventral/dorsal sides. The reaction region contained osteocytes with a nucleus and osteoblasts accumulated on the surface of an osteoid, while a laminar structure was visible for mature bone regions. For fresh bone autografts, the reaction and mature bone regions significantly increased from 8 to 16 weeks post-reconstruction. By comparison, for frozen autografts, the reaction bone region did not significantly increase from 8 to 16 weeks post-reconstruction, while the mature bone region did increase over this time period. The proportion of reaction bone was higher at the ends and dorsal side of the cage at 8 weeks, for both graft types, with greater bone formation at the center of the cage at 16 weeks only for the fresh bone autograft. Therefore, bone formation in the anterior spinal reconstruction site tended to be delayed when using a frozen bone autograft compared to a fresh bone autograft. The bone formation process, however, was similar for both groups, beginning at the ends and dorsal side of the cage adjacent to the surrounding vertebral bone. Public Library of Science 2018-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5784937/ /pubmed/29370240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191679 Text en © 2018 Shinmura et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shinmura, Kazuya Murakami, Hideki Demura, Satoru Kato, Satoshi Yoshioka, Katsuhito Hayashi, Hiroyuki Inoue, Kei Ota, Takashi Yokogawa, Noriaki Ishii, Takayoshi Igarashi, Takashi Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft |
title | A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft |
title_full | A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft |
title_fullStr | A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft |
title_full_unstemmed | A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft |
title_short | A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft |
title_sort | histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29370240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191679 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shinmurakazuya ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT murakamihideki ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT demurasatoru ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT katosatoshi ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT yoshiokakatsuhito ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT hayashihiroyuki ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT inouekei ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT otatakashi ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT yokogawanoriaki ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT ishiitakayoshi ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT igarashitakashi ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT tsuchiyahiroyuki ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT shinmurakazuya histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT murakamihideki histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT demurasatoru histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT katosatoshi histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT yoshiokakatsuhito histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT hayashihiroyuki histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT inouekei histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT otatakashi histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT yokogawanoriaki histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT ishiitakayoshi histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT igarashitakashi histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft AT tsuchiyahiroyuki histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft |