Cargando…

A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft

Our aim was to compare the process of bone formation after reconstruction of the vertebral body using a titanium cage with either a liquid nitrogen-treated (frozen) bone autograft or non-treated fresh bone autograft. Twelve canine beagles underwent anterior reconstruction of the 5(th) lumbar vertebr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shinmura, Kazuya, Murakami, Hideki, Demura, Satoru, Kato, Satoshi, Yoshioka, Katsuhito, Hayashi, Hiroyuki, Inoue, Kei, Ota, Takashi, Yokogawa, Noriaki, Ishii, Takayoshi, Igarashi, Takashi, Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29370240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191679
_version_ 1783295538800623616
author Shinmura, Kazuya
Murakami, Hideki
Demura, Satoru
Kato, Satoshi
Yoshioka, Katsuhito
Hayashi, Hiroyuki
Inoue, Kei
Ota, Takashi
Yokogawa, Noriaki
Ishii, Takayoshi
Igarashi, Takashi
Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
author_facet Shinmura, Kazuya
Murakami, Hideki
Demura, Satoru
Kato, Satoshi
Yoshioka, Katsuhito
Hayashi, Hiroyuki
Inoue, Kei
Ota, Takashi
Yokogawa, Noriaki
Ishii, Takayoshi
Igarashi, Takashi
Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
author_sort Shinmura, Kazuya
collection PubMed
description Our aim was to compare the process of bone formation after reconstruction of the vertebral body using a titanium cage with either a liquid nitrogen-treated (frozen) bone autograft or non-treated fresh bone autograft. Twelve canine beagles underwent anterior reconstruction of the 5(th) lumbar vertebrae using a titanium cage and bone autograft. Bone formation was compared across four experimental groups: fresh bone autograft groups, with animals sacrificed at either 8 or 16 weeks post-reconstruction, and liquid nitrogen-treated (frozen) bone autograft groups, with animals again sacrificed at either 8 or 16 weeks post-reconstruction. Bone formation was evaluated histologically by calculating the proportion of ‘reaction’ and ‘mature bone’ regions at the ends of the cage, its center, and ventral/dorsal sides. The reaction region contained osteocytes with a nucleus and osteoblasts accumulated on the surface of an osteoid, while a laminar structure was visible for mature bone regions. For fresh bone autografts, the reaction and mature bone regions significantly increased from 8 to 16 weeks post-reconstruction. By comparison, for frozen autografts, the reaction bone region did not significantly increase from 8 to 16 weeks post-reconstruction, while the mature bone region did increase over this time period. The proportion of reaction bone was higher at the ends and dorsal side of the cage at 8 weeks, for both graft types, with greater bone formation at the center of the cage at 16 weeks only for the fresh bone autograft. Therefore, bone formation in the anterior spinal reconstruction site tended to be delayed when using a frozen bone autograft compared to a fresh bone autograft. The bone formation process, however, was similar for both groups, beginning at the ends and dorsal side of the cage adjacent to the surrounding vertebral bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5784937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57849372018-02-09 A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft Shinmura, Kazuya Murakami, Hideki Demura, Satoru Kato, Satoshi Yoshioka, Katsuhito Hayashi, Hiroyuki Inoue, Kei Ota, Takashi Yokogawa, Noriaki Ishii, Takayoshi Igarashi, Takashi Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki PLoS One Research Article Our aim was to compare the process of bone formation after reconstruction of the vertebral body using a titanium cage with either a liquid nitrogen-treated (frozen) bone autograft or non-treated fresh bone autograft. Twelve canine beagles underwent anterior reconstruction of the 5(th) lumbar vertebrae using a titanium cage and bone autograft. Bone formation was compared across four experimental groups: fresh bone autograft groups, with animals sacrificed at either 8 or 16 weeks post-reconstruction, and liquid nitrogen-treated (frozen) bone autograft groups, with animals again sacrificed at either 8 or 16 weeks post-reconstruction. Bone formation was evaluated histologically by calculating the proportion of ‘reaction’ and ‘mature bone’ regions at the ends of the cage, its center, and ventral/dorsal sides. The reaction region contained osteocytes with a nucleus and osteoblasts accumulated on the surface of an osteoid, while a laminar structure was visible for mature bone regions. For fresh bone autografts, the reaction and mature bone regions significantly increased from 8 to 16 weeks post-reconstruction. By comparison, for frozen autografts, the reaction bone region did not significantly increase from 8 to 16 weeks post-reconstruction, while the mature bone region did increase over this time period. The proportion of reaction bone was higher at the ends and dorsal side of the cage at 8 weeks, for both graft types, with greater bone formation at the center of the cage at 16 weeks only for the fresh bone autograft. Therefore, bone formation in the anterior spinal reconstruction site tended to be delayed when using a frozen bone autograft compared to a fresh bone autograft. The bone formation process, however, was similar for both groups, beginning at the ends and dorsal side of the cage adjacent to the surrounding vertebral bone. Public Library of Science 2018-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5784937/ /pubmed/29370240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191679 Text en © 2018 Shinmura et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shinmura, Kazuya
Murakami, Hideki
Demura, Satoru
Kato, Satoshi
Yoshioka, Katsuhito
Hayashi, Hiroyuki
Inoue, Kei
Ota, Takashi
Yokogawa, Noriaki
Ishii, Takayoshi
Igarashi, Takashi
Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft
title A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft
title_full A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft
title_fullStr A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft
title_full_unstemmed A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft
title_short A histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft
title_sort histological examination of spinal reconstruction using a frozen bone autograft
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29370240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191679
work_keys_str_mv AT shinmurakazuya ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT murakamihideki ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT demurasatoru ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT katosatoshi ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT yoshiokakatsuhito ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT hayashihiroyuki ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT inouekei ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT otatakashi ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT yokogawanoriaki ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT ishiitakayoshi ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT igarashitakashi ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT tsuchiyahiroyuki ahistologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT shinmurakazuya histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT murakamihideki histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT demurasatoru histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT katosatoshi histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT yoshiokakatsuhito histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT hayashihiroyuki histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT inouekei histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT otatakashi histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT yokogawanoriaki histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT ishiitakayoshi histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT igarashitakashi histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft
AT tsuchiyahiroyuki histologicalexaminationofspinalreconstructionusingafrozenboneautograft