Cargando…

Face-to-Face Versus Mobile Versus Blended Weight Loss Program: Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Conventional face-to-face weight loss and weight control programs are very labor intensive for both the patient and the provider. It is unclear to what extent conventional programs can be (partially) completed by mobile health (mHealth) apps. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurkmans, Emalie, Matthys, Christophe, Bogaerts, An, Scheys, Leonie, Devloo, Karlien, Seghers, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5785684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29326093
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7713
_version_ 1783295649826996224
author Hurkmans, Emalie
Matthys, Christophe
Bogaerts, An
Scheys, Leonie
Devloo, Karlien
Seghers, Jan
author_facet Hurkmans, Emalie
Matthys, Christophe
Bogaerts, An
Scheys, Leonie
Devloo, Karlien
Seghers, Jan
author_sort Hurkmans, Emalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conventional face-to-face weight loss and weight control programs are very labor intensive for both the patient and the provider. It is unclear to what extent conventional programs can be (partially) completed by mobile health (mHealth) apps. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of different weight loss programs using a combination of conventional and mobile programs among adults who are overweight (body mass index [BMI]>29 kg/m²). METHODS: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial among obese adults was performed from September 2015 to March 2016. The study took place in Leuven, Belgium. Of the 102 eligible (BMI >29 kg/m²) adults, 81 (79%) completed the study. The three intervention groups consisted of a conventional face-to-face weight loss program, a weight loss app program (app group), and a partial face-to-face and partial app program (combi group). All intervention groups received the same advice from a dietician and a physical activity coach during a 12-week period. The control group did not receive any information during the same period. Primary outcomes were weight reduction (5% decrease of baseline weight in kg), BMI, metabolic risk factors, dietary pattern, and physical activity. RESULTS: Significant more participants in all three intervention groups lost at least 5% or more of their weight at baseline compared with the control group. No significant difference was found between the combi group and the conventional group. A trend was found that more participants in the combi group lost 5% or more compared with the app group (19%), P=.06. A significant time x group effect was found for BMI and metabolic risk factors, with the control group having the worst results and the combi group being significantly better with regard to BMI compared with the app group. No significant group x time effects were found for the intake of different food and drinks and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that a conventional weight loss program could partially be completed with an mHealth program without affecting the effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02595671; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02595671 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6w1H0x1Q6)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5785684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57856842018-02-02 Face-to-Face Versus Mobile Versus Blended Weight Loss Program: Randomized Clinical Trial Hurkmans, Emalie Matthys, Christophe Bogaerts, An Scheys, Leonie Devloo, Karlien Seghers, Jan JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Conventional face-to-face weight loss and weight control programs are very labor intensive for both the patient and the provider. It is unclear to what extent conventional programs can be (partially) completed by mobile health (mHealth) apps. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of different weight loss programs using a combination of conventional and mobile programs among adults who are overweight (body mass index [BMI]>29 kg/m²). METHODS: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial among obese adults was performed from September 2015 to March 2016. The study took place in Leuven, Belgium. Of the 102 eligible (BMI >29 kg/m²) adults, 81 (79%) completed the study. The three intervention groups consisted of a conventional face-to-face weight loss program, a weight loss app program (app group), and a partial face-to-face and partial app program (combi group). All intervention groups received the same advice from a dietician and a physical activity coach during a 12-week period. The control group did not receive any information during the same period. Primary outcomes were weight reduction (5% decrease of baseline weight in kg), BMI, metabolic risk factors, dietary pattern, and physical activity. RESULTS: Significant more participants in all three intervention groups lost at least 5% or more of their weight at baseline compared with the control group. No significant difference was found between the combi group and the conventional group. A trend was found that more participants in the combi group lost 5% or more compared with the app group (19%), P=.06. A significant time x group effect was found for BMI and metabolic risk factors, with the control group having the worst results and the combi group being significantly better with regard to BMI compared with the app group. No significant group x time effects were found for the intake of different food and drinks and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that a conventional weight loss program could partially be completed with an mHealth program without affecting the effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02595671; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02595671 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6w1H0x1Q6) JMIR Publications 2018-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5785684/ /pubmed/29326093 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7713 Text en ©Emalie Hurkmans, Christophe Matthys, An Bogaerts, Leonie Scheys, Karlien Devloo, Jan Seghers. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 11.01.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hurkmans, Emalie
Matthys, Christophe
Bogaerts, An
Scheys, Leonie
Devloo, Karlien
Seghers, Jan
Face-to-Face Versus Mobile Versus Blended Weight Loss Program: Randomized Clinical Trial
title Face-to-Face Versus Mobile Versus Blended Weight Loss Program: Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Face-to-Face Versus Mobile Versus Blended Weight Loss Program: Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Face-to-Face Versus Mobile Versus Blended Weight Loss Program: Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Face-to-Face Versus Mobile Versus Blended Weight Loss Program: Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Face-to-Face Versus Mobile Versus Blended Weight Loss Program: Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort face-to-face versus mobile versus blended weight loss program: randomized clinical trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5785684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29326093
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7713
work_keys_str_mv AT hurkmansemalie facetofaceversusmobileversusblendedweightlossprogramrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT matthyschristophe facetofaceversusmobileversusblendedweightlossprogramrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bogaertsan facetofaceversusmobileversusblendedweightlossprogramrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT scheysleonie facetofaceversusmobileversusblendedweightlossprogramrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT devlookarlien facetofaceversusmobileversusblendedweightlossprogramrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT seghersjan facetofaceversusmobileversusblendedweightlossprogramrandomizedclinicaltrial