Cargando…
Rat model of anal sphincter injury and two approaches for stem cell administration
AIM: To establish a rat model of anal sphincter injury and test different systems to provide stem cells to injured area. METHODS: Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) were isolated from BDIX rats and were transfected with green fluorescent protein (GFP) for cell tracking. Biosutures (sutures covered wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5785699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391927 http://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v10.i1.1 |
_version_ | 1783295653362794496 |
---|---|
author | Trébol, Jacobo Georgiev-Hristov, Tihomir Vega-Clemente, Luz García-Gómez, Ignacio Carabias-Orgaz, Ana García-Arranz, Mariano García-Olmo, Damián |
author_facet | Trébol, Jacobo Georgiev-Hristov, Tihomir Vega-Clemente, Luz García-Gómez, Ignacio Carabias-Orgaz, Ana García-Arranz, Mariano García-Olmo, Damián |
author_sort | Trébol, Jacobo |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To establish a rat model of anal sphincter injury and test different systems to provide stem cells to injured area. METHODS: Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) were isolated from BDIX rats and were transfected with green fluorescent protein (GFP) for cell tracking. Biosutures (sutures covered with ASCs) were prepared with 1.5 x 10(6) GFP-ASCs, and solutions of 10(6) GFP-ASCs in normal saline were prepared for injection. Anorectal normal anatomy was studied on Wistar and BDIX female rats. Then, we designed an anal sphincter injury model consisting of a 1-cm extra-mucosal miotomy beginning at the anal verge in the anterior middle line. The sphincter lesion was confirmed with conventional histology (hematoxylin and eosin) and immunofluorescence with 4', 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (commonly known as DAPI), GFP and α-actin. Functional effect was assessed with basal anal manometry, prior to and after injury. After sphincter damage, 36 BDIX rats were randomized to three groups for: (1) Cell injection without repair; (2) biosuture repair; and (3) conventional suture repair and cell injection. Functional and safety studies were conducted on all the animals. Rats were sacrificed after 1, 4 or 7 d. Then, histological and immunofluorescence studies were performed on the surgical area. RESULTS: With the described protocol, biosutures had been covered with at least 820000-860000 ASCs, with 100% viability. Our studies demonstrated that some ASCs remained adhered after suture passage through the muscle. Morphological assessment showed that the rat anal anatomy is comparable with human anatomy; two sphincters are present, but the external sphincter is poorly developed. Anal sphincter pressure data showed spontaneous, consistent, rhythmic anal contractions, taking the form of “plateaus” with multiple twitches (peaks) in each pressure wave. These basal contractions were very heterogeneous; their frequency was 0.91-4.17 per min (mean 1.6980, SD 0.57698), their mean duration was 26.67 s and mean number of peaks was 12.53. Our morphological assessment revealed that with the aforementioned surgical procedure, both sphincters were completely sectioned. In manometry, the described activity disappeared and was replaced by a gentle oscillation of basal line, without a recognizable pattern. Surprisingly, these findings appeared irrespective of injury repair or not. ASCs survived in this potentially septic area for 7 d, at least. We were able to identify them in 84% of animals, mainly in the muscular section area or in the tissue between the muscular endings. ASCs formed a kind of “conglomerate” in rats treated with injections, while in the biosuture group, they wrapped the suture. ASCs were also able to migrate to the damaged zone. No relevant adverse events or mortality could be related to the stem cells in our study. We also did not find unexpected tissue growths. CONCLUSION: The proposed procedure produces a consistent sphincter lesion. Biosutures and injections are suitable for cell delivery. ASCs survive and are completely safe in this clinical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5785699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57856992018-02-01 Rat model of anal sphincter injury and two approaches for stem cell administration Trébol, Jacobo Georgiev-Hristov, Tihomir Vega-Clemente, Luz García-Gómez, Ignacio Carabias-Orgaz, Ana García-Arranz, Mariano García-Olmo, Damián World J Stem Cells Basic Study AIM: To establish a rat model of anal sphincter injury and test different systems to provide stem cells to injured area. METHODS: Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) were isolated from BDIX rats and were transfected with green fluorescent protein (GFP) for cell tracking. Biosutures (sutures covered with ASCs) were prepared with 1.5 x 10(6) GFP-ASCs, and solutions of 10(6) GFP-ASCs in normal saline were prepared for injection. Anorectal normal anatomy was studied on Wistar and BDIX female rats. Then, we designed an anal sphincter injury model consisting of a 1-cm extra-mucosal miotomy beginning at the anal verge in the anterior middle line. The sphincter lesion was confirmed with conventional histology (hematoxylin and eosin) and immunofluorescence with 4', 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (commonly known as DAPI), GFP and α-actin. Functional effect was assessed with basal anal manometry, prior to and after injury. After sphincter damage, 36 BDIX rats were randomized to three groups for: (1) Cell injection without repair; (2) biosuture repair; and (3) conventional suture repair and cell injection. Functional and safety studies were conducted on all the animals. Rats were sacrificed after 1, 4 or 7 d. Then, histological and immunofluorescence studies were performed on the surgical area. RESULTS: With the described protocol, biosutures had been covered with at least 820000-860000 ASCs, with 100% viability. Our studies demonstrated that some ASCs remained adhered after suture passage through the muscle. Morphological assessment showed that the rat anal anatomy is comparable with human anatomy; two sphincters are present, but the external sphincter is poorly developed. Anal sphincter pressure data showed spontaneous, consistent, rhythmic anal contractions, taking the form of “plateaus” with multiple twitches (peaks) in each pressure wave. These basal contractions were very heterogeneous; their frequency was 0.91-4.17 per min (mean 1.6980, SD 0.57698), their mean duration was 26.67 s and mean number of peaks was 12.53. Our morphological assessment revealed that with the aforementioned surgical procedure, both sphincters were completely sectioned. In manometry, the described activity disappeared and was replaced by a gentle oscillation of basal line, without a recognizable pattern. Surprisingly, these findings appeared irrespective of injury repair or not. ASCs survived in this potentially septic area for 7 d, at least. We were able to identify them in 84% of animals, mainly in the muscular section area or in the tissue between the muscular endings. ASCs formed a kind of “conglomerate” in rats treated with injections, while in the biosuture group, they wrapped the suture. ASCs were also able to migrate to the damaged zone. No relevant adverse events or mortality could be related to the stem cells in our study. We also did not find unexpected tissue growths. CONCLUSION: The proposed procedure produces a consistent sphincter lesion. Biosutures and injections are suitable for cell delivery. ASCs survive and are completely safe in this clinical setting. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-01-26 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5785699/ /pubmed/29391927 http://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v10.i1.1 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Basic Study Trébol, Jacobo Georgiev-Hristov, Tihomir Vega-Clemente, Luz García-Gómez, Ignacio Carabias-Orgaz, Ana García-Arranz, Mariano García-Olmo, Damián Rat model of anal sphincter injury and two approaches for stem cell administration |
title | Rat model of anal sphincter injury and two approaches for stem cell administration |
title_full | Rat model of anal sphincter injury and two approaches for stem cell administration |
title_fullStr | Rat model of anal sphincter injury and two approaches for stem cell administration |
title_full_unstemmed | Rat model of anal sphincter injury and two approaches for stem cell administration |
title_short | Rat model of anal sphincter injury and two approaches for stem cell administration |
title_sort | rat model of anal sphincter injury and two approaches for stem cell administration |
topic | Basic Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5785699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391927 http://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v10.i1.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT treboljacobo ratmodelofanalsphincterinjuryandtwoapproachesforstemcelladministration AT georgievhristovtihomir ratmodelofanalsphincterinjuryandtwoapproachesforstemcelladministration AT vegaclementeluz ratmodelofanalsphincterinjuryandtwoapproachesforstemcelladministration AT garciagomezignacio ratmodelofanalsphincterinjuryandtwoapproachesforstemcelladministration AT carabiasorgazana ratmodelofanalsphincterinjuryandtwoapproachesforstemcelladministration AT garciaarranzmariano ratmodelofanalsphincterinjuryandtwoapproachesforstemcelladministration AT garciaolmodamian ratmodelofanalsphincterinjuryandtwoapproachesforstemcelladministration |