Cargando…
Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation
BACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning (ACP) is the repeated communication and decision-making process between the patient, family, and healthcare professionals. This study describes an ACP intervention in nursing homes and evaluates the outcomes of the implementation process. METHODS: The ACP interventi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5785831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29370766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0713-7 |
_version_ | 1783295680990674944 |
---|---|
author | Aasmul, Irene Husebo, Bettina S. Flo, Elisabeth |
author_facet | Aasmul, Irene Husebo, Bettina S. Flo, Elisabeth |
author_sort | Aasmul, Irene |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning (ACP) is the repeated communication and decision-making process between the patient, family, and healthcare professionals. This study describes an ACP intervention in nursing homes and evaluates the outcomes of the implementation process. METHODS: The ACP intervention was part of a 4-month complex, cluster randomized controlled trial (COSMOS). 37 Norwegian nursing homes with 72 units (1 cluster = 1 unit) and 765 patients were invited to participate and eligible units were randomised to the intervention group or control. Nursing home staff in the intervention group was offered a standardized education programme to learn early and repeated communication with patients and families and to implement ACP in their units. We used a train-the-trainer approach to educate staff in the units, supported by regular telephone calls and a midway seminar after two months. Individual patient logs consisting of different communication deliverables were used to evaluate the implementation process. Supported by Qualitative Content Analyses, we identified facilitators and barriers of the ACP implementation based on feedback during midway seminars and individual patient logs. RESULTS: The ACP intervention was conducted in 36 NH units (n = 297); 105 healthcare providers participated at the education seminar prior to the study, and 3–4 employees from each unit participated in the midway seminar. NH staff reported the educational material relevant for the implementation strategy. The patient logs showed that ACP was successfully implemented in 62% (n = 183) of the patients using our predefined implementation criteria. The staff emphasized the clear communication of the relevance of ACP addressed to leaders and staff as important facilitators, along with the clearly defined routines, roles and responsibilities. Identified barriers included lack of competence, perceived lack of time, and conflicting culture and staff opinions. CONCLUSION: Monthly communication with the family was the most frequently conducted communication, and the predefined criteria of successfully implemented ACP were largely achieved. Nursing home routines and engagement of leaders and staff were crucial facilitators, whereas lack of time and competence reduced the implementation success. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The COSMOS-trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02238652) July 7th, 2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0713-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5785831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57858312018-02-07 Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation Aasmul, Irene Husebo, Bettina S. Flo, Elisabeth BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning (ACP) is the repeated communication and decision-making process between the patient, family, and healthcare professionals. This study describes an ACP intervention in nursing homes and evaluates the outcomes of the implementation process. METHODS: The ACP intervention was part of a 4-month complex, cluster randomized controlled trial (COSMOS). 37 Norwegian nursing homes with 72 units (1 cluster = 1 unit) and 765 patients were invited to participate and eligible units were randomised to the intervention group or control. Nursing home staff in the intervention group was offered a standardized education programme to learn early and repeated communication with patients and families and to implement ACP in their units. We used a train-the-trainer approach to educate staff in the units, supported by regular telephone calls and a midway seminar after two months. Individual patient logs consisting of different communication deliverables were used to evaluate the implementation process. Supported by Qualitative Content Analyses, we identified facilitators and barriers of the ACP implementation based on feedback during midway seminars and individual patient logs. RESULTS: The ACP intervention was conducted in 36 NH units (n = 297); 105 healthcare providers participated at the education seminar prior to the study, and 3–4 employees from each unit participated in the midway seminar. NH staff reported the educational material relevant for the implementation strategy. The patient logs showed that ACP was successfully implemented in 62% (n = 183) of the patients using our predefined implementation criteria. The staff emphasized the clear communication of the relevance of ACP addressed to leaders and staff as important facilitators, along with the clearly defined routines, roles and responsibilities. Identified barriers included lack of competence, perceived lack of time, and conflicting culture and staff opinions. CONCLUSION: Monthly communication with the family was the most frequently conducted communication, and the predefined criteria of successfully implemented ACP were largely achieved. Nursing home routines and engagement of leaders and staff were crucial facilitators, whereas lack of time and competence reduced the implementation success. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The COSMOS-trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02238652) July 7th, 2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0713-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5785831/ /pubmed/29370766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0713-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Aasmul, Irene Husebo, Bettina S. Flo, Elisabeth Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation |
title | Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation |
title_full | Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation |
title_fullStr | Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation |
title_short | Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation |
title_sort | description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5785831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29370766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0713-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aasmulirene descriptionofanadvancecareplanninginterventioninnursinghomesoutcomesoftheprocessevaluation AT husebobettinas descriptionofanadvancecareplanninginterventioninnursinghomesoutcomesoftheprocessevaluation AT floelisabeth descriptionofanadvancecareplanninginterventioninnursinghomesoutcomesoftheprocessevaluation |