Cargando…
Associations between intraoperative ventilator settings during one-lung ventilation and postoperative pulmonary complications: a prospective observational study
BACKGROUND: The interest in perioperative lung protective ventilation has been increasing. However, optimal management during one-lung ventilation (OLV) remains undetermined, which not only includes tidal volume (V(T)) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) but also inspired oxygen fraction (F(...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5785851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29370755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0476-x |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The interest in perioperative lung protective ventilation has been increasing. However, optimal management during one-lung ventilation (OLV) remains undetermined, which not only includes tidal volume (V(T)) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) but also inspired oxygen fraction (F(I)O(2)). We aimed to investigate current practice of intraoperative ventilation during OLV, and analyze whether the intraoperative ventilator settings are associated with postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after thoracic surgery. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational two-center study in Japan. Patients scheduled for thoracic surgery with OLV from April to October 2014 were eligible. We recorded ventilator settings (F(I)O(2), V(T), driving pressure (ΔP), and PEEP) and calculated the time-weighted average (TWA) of ventilator settings for the first 2 h of OLV. PPCs occurring within 7 days of thoracotomy were investigated. Associations between ventilator settings and the incidence of PPCs were examined by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: We analyzed perioperative information, including preoperative characteristics, ventilator settings, and details of surgery and anesthesia in 197 patients. Pressure control ventilation was utilized in most cases (92%). As an initial setting for OLV, an F(I)O(2) of 1.0 was selected for more than 60% of all patients. Throughout OLV, the median TWA F(I)O(2) of 0.8 (0.65-0.94), V(T) of 6.1 (5.3-7.0) ml/kg, ΔP of 17 (15-20) cm H(2)O, and PEEP of 4 (4-5) cm H(2)O was applied. Incidence rate of PPCs was 25.9%, and F(I)O(2) was independently associated with the occurrence of PPCs in multivariate logistic regression. The adjusted odds ratio per F(I)O(2) increase of 0.1 was 1.30 (95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.65, P = 0.0195). CONCLUSIONS: High F(I)O(2) was applied to the majority of patients during OLV, whereas low V(T) and slight degree of PEEP were commonly used in our survey. Our findings suggested that a higher F(I)O(2) during OLV could be associated with increased incidence of PPCs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0476-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
---|