Cargando…

Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACT-FAST)—a feasibility study protocol

BACKGROUND: Major postoperative morbidity and mortality remain common despite efforts to improve patient outcomes. Health information technologies have the potential to actualize advances in perioperative patient care, but failure to evaluate the usability of these technologies may hinder their impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murray-Torres, Teresa M., Wallace, Frances, Bollini, Mara, Avidan, Michael S., Politi, Mary C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5785885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0233-4
_version_ 1783295694543519744
author Murray-Torres, Teresa M.
Wallace, Frances
Bollini, Mara
Avidan, Michael S.
Politi, Mary C.
author_facet Murray-Torres, Teresa M.
Wallace, Frances
Bollini, Mara
Avidan, Michael S.
Politi, Mary C.
author_sort Murray-Torres, Teresa M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Major postoperative morbidity and mortality remain common despite efforts to improve patient outcomes. Health information technologies have the potential to actualize advances in perioperative patient care, but failure to evaluate the usability of these technologies may hinder their implementation and acceptance. This protocol describes the usability testing of an innovative telemedicine-based intra-operative clinical support system, the Anesthesiology Control Tower, in which a team led by an attending anesthesiologist will use a combination of established and novel information technologies to provide evidence-based support to their colleagues in the operating room. METHODS: Two phases of mixed-methods usability testing will be conducted in an iterative manner and will evaluate both the individual components of the Anesthesiology Control Tower and their integration as a whole. Phase I testing will employ two separate “think-aloud” protocol analyses with the two groups of end users. Segments will be coded and analyzed for usability issues. Phase II will involve a qualitative and quantitative in situ usability and feasibility analysis. Results from each phase will inform the revision and improvement of the Control Tower prototype throughout our testing and analysis process. The final prototype will be evaluated in the form of a pragmatic randomized controlled clinical trial. DISCUSSION: The Anesthesiology Control Tower has the potential to revolutionize the standard of care for perioperative medicine. Through the thorough and iterative usability testing process described in this protocol, we will maximize the usefulness of this novel technology for our clinicians, thus improving our ability to implement this innovation into the model of care for perioperative medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study that this protocol describes has been registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02830126.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5785885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57858852018-02-07 Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACT-FAST)—a feasibility study protocol Murray-Torres, Teresa M. Wallace, Frances Bollini, Mara Avidan, Michael S. Politi, Mary C. Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Major postoperative morbidity and mortality remain common despite efforts to improve patient outcomes. Health information technologies have the potential to actualize advances in perioperative patient care, but failure to evaluate the usability of these technologies may hinder their implementation and acceptance. This protocol describes the usability testing of an innovative telemedicine-based intra-operative clinical support system, the Anesthesiology Control Tower, in which a team led by an attending anesthesiologist will use a combination of established and novel information technologies to provide evidence-based support to their colleagues in the operating room. METHODS: Two phases of mixed-methods usability testing will be conducted in an iterative manner and will evaluate both the individual components of the Anesthesiology Control Tower and their integration as a whole. Phase I testing will employ two separate “think-aloud” protocol analyses with the two groups of end users. Segments will be coded and analyzed for usability issues. Phase II will involve a qualitative and quantitative in situ usability and feasibility analysis. Results from each phase will inform the revision and improvement of the Control Tower prototype throughout our testing and analysis process. The final prototype will be evaluated in the form of a pragmatic randomized controlled clinical trial. DISCUSSION: The Anesthesiology Control Tower has the potential to revolutionize the standard of care for perioperative medicine. Through the thorough and iterative usability testing process described in this protocol, we will maximize the usefulness of this novel technology for our clinicians, thus improving our ability to implement this innovation into the model of care for perioperative medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study that this protocol describes has been registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02830126. BioMed Central 2018-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5785885/ /pubmed/29416871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0233-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Murray-Torres, Teresa M.
Wallace, Frances
Bollini, Mara
Avidan, Michael S.
Politi, Mary C.
Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACT-FAST)—a feasibility study protocol
title Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACT-FAST)—a feasibility study protocol
title_full Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACT-FAST)—a feasibility study protocol
title_fullStr Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACT-FAST)—a feasibility study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACT-FAST)—a feasibility study protocol
title_short Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACT-FAST)—a feasibility study protocol
title_sort anesthesiology control tower: feasibility assessment to support translation (act-fast)—a feasibility study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5785885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0233-4
work_keys_str_mv AT murraytorresteresam anesthesiologycontroltowerfeasibilityassessmenttosupporttranslationactfastafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT wallacefrances anesthesiologycontroltowerfeasibilityassessmenttosupporttranslationactfastafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT bollinimara anesthesiologycontroltowerfeasibilityassessmenttosupporttranslationactfastafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT avidanmichaels anesthesiologycontroltowerfeasibilityassessmenttosupporttranslationactfastafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT politimaryc anesthesiologycontroltowerfeasibilityassessmenttosupporttranslationactfastafeasibilitystudyprotocol