Cargando…

A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections

There is limited clinical evidence to support the combination of daptomycin and beta-lactam antibiotics (DAP + BLA) for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infections (BSI). We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of VRE-BSI during 2010–2015. The primary end...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chuang, Yu-Chung, Chen, Pao-Yu, Lin, Chi-Ying, Chen, Yee-Chun, Wang, Jann-Tay, Chang, Shan-Chwen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29374204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19986-8
_version_ 1783295715048423424
author Chuang, Yu-Chung
Chen, Pao-Yu
Lin, Chi-Ying
Chen, Yee-Chun
Wang, Jann-Tay
Chang, Shan-Chwen
author_facet Chuang, Yu-Chung
Chen, Pao-Yu
Lin, Chi-Ying
Chen, Yee-Chun
Wang, Jann-Tay
Chang, Shan-Chwen
author_sort Chuang, Yu-Chung
collection PubMed
description There is limited clinical evidence to support the combination of daptomycin and beta-lactam antibiotics (DAP + BLA) for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infections (BSI). We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of VRE-BSI during 2010–2015. The primary endpoint was mortality at the end of treatment. We included 114 patients who received DAP for VRE-BSI. Of these 87 (76.3%) received DAP + BLA. There were no significant differences in mortality between the DAP and DAP + BLA groups on univariable analysis (10/27 vs. 34/87, P = 0.85). A subgroup analysis of patients with enterococcal DAP minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ≤2 mg/L, revealed that those treated with DAP + BLA had a lower mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06–0.93; P = 0.04) after adjustment for other significant predictors of mortality, including the DAP dose. In addition, patients receiving high-dose (≥9 mg/kg) DAP + BLA independently had a better survival than those receiving low-dose DAP alone (aHR = 5.16), low-dose DAP + BLA (aHR = 5.39), and high-dose DAP alone (aHR = 19.01) (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). For patients with VRE-BSIs, the DAP MIC of the isolate and the DAP dose influence the effect of DAP + BLA on outcome. A high-dose DAP + BLA might improve survival. These findings support the use of high-dose DAP + BLA for treatment of VRE-BSI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5786011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57860112018-02-07 A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections Chuang, Yu-Chung Chen, Pao-Yu Lin, Chi-Ying Chen, Yee-Chun Wang, Jann-Tay Chang, Shan-Chwen Sci Rep Article There is limited clinical evidence to support the combination of daptomycin and beta-lactam antibiotics (DAP + BLA) for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infections (BSI). We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of VRE-BSI during 2010–2015. The primary endpoint was mortality at the end of treatment. We included 114 patients who received DAP for VRE-BSI. Of these 87 (76.3%) received DAP + BLA. There were no significant differences in mortality between the DAP and DAP + BLA groups on univariable analysis (10/27 vs. 34/87, P = 0.85). A subgroup analysis of patients with enterococcal DAP minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ≤2 mg/L, revealed that those treated with DAP + BLA had a lower mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06–0.93; P = 0.04) after adjustment for other significant predictors of mortality, including the DAP dose. In addition, patients receiving high-dose (≥9 mg/kg) DAP + BLA independently had a better survival than those receiving low-dose DAP alone (aHR = 5.16), low-dose DAP + BLA (aHR = 5.39), and high-dose DAP alone (aHR = 19.01) (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). For patients with VRE-BSIs, the DAP MIC of the isolate and the DAP dose influence the effect of DAP + BLA on outcome. A high-dose DAP + BLA might improve survival. These findings support the use of high-dose DAP + BLA for treatment of VRE-BSI. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5786011/ /pubmed/29374204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19986-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Chuang, Yu-Chung
Chen, Pao-Yu
Lin, Chi-Ying
Chen, Yee-Chun
Wang, Jann-Tay
Chang, Shan-Chwen
A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections
title A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections
title_full A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections
title_fullStr A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections
title_short A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections
title_sort retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29374204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19986-8
work_keys_str_mv AT chuangyuchung aretrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections
AT chenpaoyu aretrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections
AT linchiying aretrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections
AT chenyeechun aretrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections
AT wangjanntay aretrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections
AT changshanchwen aretrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections
AT chuangyuchung retrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections
AT chenpaoyu retrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections
AT linchiying retrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections
AT chenyeechun retrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections
AT wangjanntay retrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections
AT changshanchwen retrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections