Cargando…
A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections
There is limited clinical evidence to support the combination of daptomycin and beta-lactam antibiotics (DAP + BLA) for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infections (BSI). We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of VRE-BSI during 2010–2015. The primary end...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29374204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19986-8 |
_version_ | 1783295715048423424 |
---|---|
author | Chuang, Yu-Chung Chen, Pao-Yu Lin, Chi-Ying Chen, Yee-Chun Wang, Jann-Tay Chang, Shan-Chwen |
author_facet | Chuang, Yu-Chung Chen, Pao-Yu Lin, Chi-Ying Chen, Yee-Chun Wang, Jann-Tay Chang, Shan-Chwen |
author_sort | Chuang, Yu-Chung |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is limited clinical evidence to support the combination of daptomycin and beta-lactam antibiotics (DAP + BLA) for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infections (BSI). We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of VRE-BSI during 2010–2015. The primary endpoint was mortality at the end of treatment. We included 114 patients who received DAP for VRE-BSI. Of these 87 (76.3%) received DAP + BLA. There were no significant differences in mortality between the DAP and DAP + BLA groups on univariable analysis (10/27 vs. 34/87, P = 0.85). A subgroup analysis of patients with enterococcal DAP minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ≤2 mg/L, revealed that those treated with DAP + BLA had a lower mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06–0.93; P = 0.04) after adjustment for other significant predictors of mortality, including the DAP dose. In addition, patients receiving high-dose (≥9 mg/kg) DAP + BLA independently had a better survival than those receiving low-dose DAP alone (aHR = 5.16), low-dose DAP + BLA (aHR = 5.39), and high-dose DAP alone (aHR = 19.01) (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). For patients with VRE-BSIs, the DAP MIC of the isolate and the DAP dose influence the effect of DAP + BLA on outcome. A high-dose DAP + BLA might improve survival. These findings support the use of high-dose DAP + BLA for treatment of VRE-BSI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5786011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57860112018-02-07 A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections Chuang, Yu-Chung Chen, Pao-Yu Lin, Chi-Ying Chen, Yee-Chun Wang, Jann-Tay Chang, Shan-Chwen Sci Rep Article There is limited clinical evidence to support the combination of daptomycin and beta-lactam antibiotics (DAP + BLA) for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infections (BSI). We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of VRE-BSI during 2010–2015. The primary endpoint was mortality at the end of treatment. We included 114 patients who received DAP for VRE-BSI. Of these 87 (76.3%) received DAP + BLA. There were no significant differences in mortality between the DAP and DAP + BLA groups on univariable analysis (10/27 vs. 34/87, P = 0.85). A subgroup analysis of patients with enterococcal DAP minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ≤2 mg/L, revealed that those treated with DAP + BLA had a lower mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06–0.93; P = 0.04) after adjustment for other significant predictors of mortality, including the DAP dose. In addition, patients receiving high-dose (≥9 mg/kg) DAP + BLA independently had a better survival than those receiving low-dose DAP alone (aHR = 5.16), low-dose DAP + BLA (aHR = 5.39), and high-dose DAP alone (aHR = 19.01) (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). For patients with VRE-BSIs, the DAP MIC of the isolate and the DAP dose influence the effect of DAP + BLA on outcome. A high-dose DAP + BLA might improve survival. These findings support the use of high-dose DAP + BLA for treatment of VRE-BSI. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5786011/ /pubmed/29374204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19986-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Chuang, Yu-Chung Chen, Pao-Yu Lin, Chi-Ying Chen, Yee-Chun Wang, Jann-Tay Chang, Shan-Chwen A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections |
title | A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections |
title_full | A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections |
title_fullStr | A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections |
title_short | A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections |
title_sort | retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs daptomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin-resistant enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29374204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19986-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chuangyuchung aretrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections AT chenpaoyu aretrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections AT linchiying aretrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections AT chenyeechun aretrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections AT wangjanntay aretrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections AT changshanchwen aretrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections AT chuangyuchung retrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections AT chenpaoyu retrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections AT linchiying retrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections AT chenyeechun retrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections AT wangjanntay retrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections AT changshanchwen retrospectiveclinicalcomparisonofdaptomycinvsdaptomycinandabetalactamantibioticfortreatingvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumbloodstreaminfections |