Cargando…
EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird
BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the effectiveness of the Protected Area networks on the conservation status of target species. Here, we assess the effectiveness of the Portuguese Natura 2000 (the European Union network of protected areas) in maintaining a species included in the Annex I of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379687 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4284 |
_version_ | 1783295724903989248 |
---|---|
author | Silva, João P. Correia, Ricardo Alonso, Hany Martins, Ricardo C. D’Amico, Marcello Delgado, Ana Sampaio, Hugo Godinho, Carlos Moreira, Francisco |
author_facet | Silva, João P. Correia, Ricardo Alonso, Hany Martins, Ricardo C. D’Amico, Marcello Delgado, Ana Sampaio, Hugo Godinho, Carlos Moreira, Francisco |
author_sort | Silva, João P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the effectiveness of the Protected Area networks on the conservation status of target species. Here, we assess the effectiveness of the Portuguese Natura 2000 (the European Union network of protected areas) in maintaining a species included in the Annex I of the Bird Directive, namely the population of a priority farmland bird, the little bustard Tetrax tetrax. METHODS: We measured the effectiveness of the Natura 2000 by comparing population trends across time (2003–2006 and 2016) in 51 areas, 21 of which within 12 Special Protection Areas (SPA) that were mostly designated for farmland bird conservation and another 30 areas without EU protection. RESULTS: Overall, the national population is estimated to have declined 49% over the last 10–14 years. This loss was found to be proportionally larger outside SPA (64% decline) compared to losses within SPA (25% decline). However, the absolute male density decline was significantly larger within SPA . DISCUSSION: In spite of holding higher population densities and having prevented habitat loss, we conclude that Natura 2000 was not effective in buffering against the overall bustard population decline. Results show that the mere designation of SPA in farmland is not enough to secure species populations and has to be combined with agricultural policies and investment to maintain not only habitat availability but also habitat quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5786059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57860592018-01-29 EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird Silva, João P. Correia, Ricardo Alonso, Hany Martins, Ricardo C. D’Amico, Marcello Delgado, Ana Sampaio, Hugo Godinho, Carlos Moreira, Francisco PeerJ Biodiversity BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the effectiveness of the Protected Area networks on the conservation status of target species. Here, we assess the effectiveness of the Portuguese Natura 2000 (the European Union network of protected areas) in maintaining a species included in the Annex I of the Bird Directive, namely the population of a priority farmland bird, the little bustard Tetrax tetrax. METHODS: We measured the effectiveness of the Natura 2000 by comparing population trends across time (2003–2006 and 2016) in 51 areas, 21 of which within 12 Special Protection Areas (SPA) that were mostly designated for farmland bird conservation and another 30 areas without EU protection. RESULTS: Overall, the national population is estimated to have declined 49% over the last 10–14 years. This loss was found to be proportionally larger outside SPA (64% decline) compared to losses within SPA (25% decline). However, the absolute male density decline was significantly larger within SPA . DISCUSSION: In spite of holding higher population densities and having prevented habitat loss, we conclude that Natura 2000 was not effective in buffering against the overall bustard population decline. Results show that the mere designation of SPA in farmland is not enough to secure species populations and has to be combined with agricultural policies and investment to maintain not only habitat availability but also habitat quality. PeerJ Inc. 2018-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5786059/ /pubmed/29379687 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4284 Text en ©2018 Silva et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Biodiversity Silva, João P. Correia, Ricardo Alonso, Hany Martins, Ricardo C. D’Amico, Marcello Delgado, Ana Sampaio, Hugo Godinho, Carlos Moreira, Francisco EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird |
title | EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird |
title_full | EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird |
title_fullStr | EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird |
title_full_unstemmed | EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird |
title_short | EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird |
title_sort | eu protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird |
topic | Biodiversity |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379687 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvajoaop euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird AT correiaricardo euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird AT alonsohany euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird AT martinsricardoc euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird AT damicomarcello euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird AT delgadoana euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird AT sampaiohugo euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird AT godinhocarlos euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird AT moreirafrancisco euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird |