Cargando…

EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird

BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the effectiveness of the Protected Area networks on the conservation status of target species. Here, we assess the effectiveness of the Portuguese Natura 2000 (the European Union network of protected areas) in maintaining a species included in the Annex I of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva, João P., Correia, Ricardo, Alonso, Hany, Martins, Ricardo C., D’Amico, Marcello, Delgado, Ana, Sampaio, Hugo, Godinho, Carlos, Moreira, Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379687
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4284
_version_ 1783295724903989248
author Silva, João P.
Correia, Ricardo
Alonso, Hany
Martins, Ricardo C.
D’Amico, Marcello
Delgado, Ana
Sampaio, Hugo
Godinho, Carlos
Moreira, Francisco
author_facet Silva, João P.
Correia, Ricardo
Alonso, Hany
Martins, Ricardo C.
D’Amico, Marcello
Delgado, Ana
Sampaio, Hugo
Godinho, Carlos
Moreira, Francisco
author_sort Silva, João P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the effectiveness of the Protected Area networks on the conservation status of target species. Here, we assess the effectiveness of the Portuguese Natura 2000 (the European Union network of protected areas) in maintaining a species included in the Annex I of the Bird Directive, namely the population of a priority farmland bird, the little bustard Tetrax tetrax. METHODS: We measured the effectiveness of the Natura 2000 by comparing population trends across time (2003–2006 and 2016) in 51 areas, 21 of which within 12 Special Protection Areas (SPA) that were mostly designated for farmland bird conservation and another 30 areas without EU protection. RESULTS: Overall, the national population is estimated to have declined 49% over the last 10–14 years. This loss was found to be proportionally larger outside SPA (64% decline) compared to losses within SPA (25% decline). However, the absolute male density decline was significantly larger within SPA . DISCUSSION: In spite of holding higher population densities and having prevented habitat loss, we conclude that Natura 2000 was not effective in buffering against the overall bustard population decline. Results show that the mere designation of SPA in farmland is not enough to secure species populations and has to be combined with agricultural policies and investment to maintain not only habitat availability but also habitat quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5786059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57860592018-01-29 EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird Silva, João P. Correia, Ricardo Alonso, Hany Martins, Ricardo C. D’Amico, Marcello Delgado, Ana Sampaio, Hugo Godinho, Carlos Moreira, Francisco PeerJ Biodiversity BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the effectiveness of the Protected Area networks on the conservation status of target species. Here, we assess the effectiveness of the Portuguese Natura 2000 (the European Union network of protected areas) in maintaining a species included in the Annex I of the Bird Directive, namely the population of a priority farmland bird, the little bustard Tetrax tetrax. METHODS: We measured the effectiveness of the Natura 2000 by comparing population trends across time (2003–2006 and 2016) in 51 areas, 21 of which within 12 Special Protection Areas (SPA) that were mostly designated for farmland bird conservation and another 30 areas without EU protection. RESULTS: Overall, the national population is estimated to have declined 49% over the last 10–14 years. This loss was found to be proportionally larger outside SPA (64% decline) compared to losses within SPA (25% decline). However, the absolute male density decline was significantly larger within SPA . DISCUSSION: In spite of holding higher population densities and having prevented habitat loss, we conclude that Natura 2000 was not effective in buffering against the overall bustard population decline. Results show that the mere designation of SPA in farmland is not enough to secure species populations and has to be combined with agricultural policies and investment to maintain not only habitat availability but also habitat quality. PeerJ Inc. 2018-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5786059/ /pubmed/29379687 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4284 Text en ©2018 Silva et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Silva, João P.
Correia, Ricardo
Alonso, Hany
Martins, Ricardo C.
D’Amico, Marcello
Delgado, Ana
Sampaio, Hugo
Godinho, Carlos
Moreira, Francisco
EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird
title EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird
title_full EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird
title_fullStr EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird
title_full_unstemmed EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird
title_short EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird
title_sort eu protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird
topic Biodiversity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379687
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4284
work_keys_str_mv AT silvajoaop euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird
AT correiaricardo euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird
AT alonsohany euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird
AT martinsricardoc euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird
AT damicomarcello euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird
AT delgadoana euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird
AT sampaiohugo euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird
AT godinhocarlos euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird
AT moreirafrancisco euprotectedareanetworkdidnotpreventacountrywidepopulationdeclineinathreatenedgrasslandbird