Cargando…

How does the outcome of research training fellowships funded via the NHS compare with that from competitively funded fellowships from the MRC and other charities: a cross-sectional retrospective survey of trainees undertaking research training in the West Midlands

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the impact of research training funded via the National Health Service (NHS) on medical trainees compared with traditional clinical research training fellowships (CRTFs). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Online survey of 221 clinical trainees who had comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maybury, Charlotte, Morgan, Matthew David, Smith, Russell, Harper, Lorraine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29362273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019630
_version_ 1783295729432788992
author Maybury, Charlotte
Morgan, Matthew David
Smith, Russell
Harper, Lorraine
author_facet Maybury, Charlotte
Morgan, Matthew David
Smith, Russell
Harper, Lorraine
author_sort Maybury, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the impact of research training funded via the National Health Service (NHS) on medical trainees compared with traditional clinical research training fellowships (CRTFs). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Online survey of 221 clinical trainees who had completed a period of research during their clinical training between 2009 and 2015 in the West Midlands. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Research outcomes. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 59%, of whom 72 participants were funded by CRTFs and 51 funded by the NHS. Although participants with CRTFs were more likely to be awarded a higher degree compared with those on NHS-administered funding (66/72 CRTFs and 37/51 NHS, P=0.005), similar proportions of NHS-funded and CRTF-funded participants entered clinical lecturer posts on completing initial research training (8/51 NHS and 16/72 CRTF, P=0.37). 77% of participants had three or more publications (CRTF 57 and NHS 39, P=0.72). 57 participants had completed clinical training; similar proportions of CRTF-funded and NHS-funded trainees had research included in their consultant contract (12/22 NHS and 14/26 CRTF, P=0.96) or were appointed to academic posts (3 of 25 NHS funded and 6 of 32 CRTF, P>0.05). 95% of participants would recommend to colleagues and 82% of participants felt the research experience improved their provision of clinical care with no difference between CRTF-funded and NHS-funded participants (P=0.49). Continuing to participate in clinical work during the research reduced reports of trainee difficulty on returning to clinical work (23/108 continued clinical work vs 12/22 no clinical work, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Research training funded by the NHS provides a quality experience and contributes to the clinical academic capacity within the UK. More needs to be done to support NHS participants to successfully achieve a higher degree.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5786076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57860762018-01-31 How does the outcome of research training fellowships funded via the NHS compare with that from competitively funded fellowships from the MRC and other charities: a cross-sectional retrospective survey of trainees undertaking research training in the West Midlands Maybury, Charlotte Morgan, Matthew David Smith, Russell Harper, Lorraine BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the impact of research training funded via the National Health Service (NHS) on medical trainees compared with traditional clinical research training fellowships (CRTFs). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Online survey of 221 clinical trainees who had completed a period of research during their clinical training between 2009 and 2015 in the West Midlands. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Research outcomes. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 59%, of whom 72 participants were funded by CRTFs and 51 funded by the NHS. Although participants with CRTFs were more likely to be awarded a higher degree compared with those on NHS-administered funding (66/72 CRTFs and 37/51 NHS, P=0.005), similar proportions of NHS-funded and CRTF-funded participants entered clinical lecturer posts on completing initial research training (8/51 NHS and 16/72 CRTF, P=0.37). 77% of participants had three or more publications (CRTF 57 and NHS 39, P=0.72). 57 participants had completed clinical training; similar proportions of CRTF-funded and NHS-funded trainees had research included in their consultant contract (12/22 NHS and 14/26 CRTF, P=0.96) or were appointed to academic posts (3 of 25 NHS funded and 6 of 32 CRTF, P>0.05). 95% of participants would recommend to colleagues and 82% of participants felt the research experience improved their provision of clinical care with no difference between CRTF-funded and NHS-funded participants (P=0.49). Continuing to participate in clinical work during the research reduced reports of trainee difficulty on returning to clinical work (23/108 continued clinical work vs 12/22 no clinical work, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Research training funded by the NHS provides a quality experience and contributes to the clinical academic capacity within the UK. More needs to be done to support NHS participants to successfully achieve a higher degree. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5786076/ /pubmed/29362273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019630 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Maybury, Charlotte
Morgan, Matthew David
Smith, Russell
Harper, Lorraine
How does the outcome of research training fellowships funded via the NHS compare with that from competitively funded fellowships from the MRC and other charities: a cross-sectional retrospective survey of trainees undertaking research training in the West Midlands
title How does the outcome of research training fellowships funded via the NHS compare with that from competitively funded fellowships from the MRC and other charities: a cross-sectional retrospective survey of trainees undertaking research training in the West Midlands
title_full How does the outcome of research training fellowships funded via the NHS compare with that from competitively funded fellowships from the MRC and other charities: a cross-sectional retrospective survey of trainees undertaking research training in the West Midlands
title_fullStr How does the outcome of research training fellowships funded via the NHS compare with that from competitively funded fellowships from the MRC and other charities: a cross-sectional retrospective survey of trainees undertaking research training in the West Midlands
title_full_unstemmed How does the outcome of research training fellowships funded via the NHS compare with that from competitively funded fellowships from the MRC and other charities: a cross-sectional retrospective survey of trainees undertaking research training in the West Midlands
title_short How does the outcome of research training fellowships funded via the NHS compare with that from competitively funded fellowships from the MRC and other charities: a cross-sectional retrospective survey of trainees undertaking research training in the West Midlands
title_sort how does the outcome of research training fellowships funded via the nhs compare with that from competitively funded fellowships from the mrc and other charities: a cross-sectional retrospective survey of trainees undertaking research training in the west midlands
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29362273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019630
work_keys_str_mv AT mayburycharlotte howdoestheoutcomeofresearchtrainingfellowshipsfundedviathenhscomparewiththatfromcompetitivelyfundedfellowshipsfromthemrcandothercharitiesacrosssectionalretrospectivesurveyoftraineesundertakingresearchtraininginthewestmidlands
AT morganmatthewdavid howdoestheoutcomeofresearchtrainingfellowshipsfundedviathenhscomparewiththatfromcompetitivelyfundedfellowshipsfromthemrcandothercharitiesacrosssectionalretrospectivesurveyoftraineesundertakingresearchtraininginthewestmidlands
AT smithrussell howdoestheoutcomeofresearchtrainingfellowshipsfundedviathenhscomparewiththatfromcompetitivelyfundedfellowshipsfromthemrcandothercharitiesacrosssectionalretrospectivesurveyoftraineesundertakingresearchtraininginthewestmidlands
AT harperlorraine howdoestheoutcomeofresearchtrainingfellowshipsfundedviathenhscomparewiththatfromcompetitivelyfundedfellowshipsfromthemrcandothercharitiesacrosssectionalretrospectivesurveyoftraineesundertakingresearchtraininginthewestmidlands