Cargando…
Tulsa 1000: a naturalistic study protocol for multilevel assessment and outcome prediction in a large psychiatric sample
INTRODUCTION: Although neuroscience has made tremendous progress towards understanding the basic neural circuitry underlying important processes such as attention, memory and emotion, little progress has been made in applying these insights to psychiatric populations to make clinically meaningful tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29371263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016620 |
_version_ | 1783295742172987392 |
---|---|
author | Victor, Teresa A Khalsa, Sahib S Simmons, W Kyle Feinstein, Justin S Savitz, Jonathan Aupperle, Robin L Yeh, Hung-Wen Bodurka, Jerzy Paulus, Martin P |
author_facet | Victor, Teresa A Khalsa, Sahib S Simmons, W Kyle Feinstein, Justin S Savitz, Jonathan Aupperle, Robin L Yeh, Hung-Wen Bodurka, Jerzy Paulus, Martin P |
author_sort | Victor, Teresa A |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Although neuroscience has made tremendous progress towards understanding the basic neural circuitry underlying important processes such as attention, memory and emotion, little progress has been made in applying these insights to psychiatric populations to make clinically meaningful treatment predictions. The overall aim of the Tulsa 1000 (T-1000) study is to use the NIMH Research Domain Criteria framework in order to establish a robust and reliable dimensional set of variables that quantifies the positive and negative valence, cognition and arousal domains, including interoception, to generate clinically useful treatment predictions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The T-1000 is a naturalistic study that will recruit, assess and longitudinally follow 1000 participants, including healthy controls and treatment-seeking individuals with mood, anxiety, substance use and eating disorders. Each participant will undergo interview, behavioural, biomarker and neuroimaging assessments over the course of 1 year. The study goal is to determine how disorders of affect, substance use and eating behaviour organise across different levels of analysis (molecules, genes, cells, neural circuits, physiology, behaviour and self-report) to predict symptom severity, treatment outcome and long-term prognosis. The data will be used to generate computational models based on Bayesian statistics. The final end point of this multilevel latent variable analysis will be standardised assessments that can be developed into clinical tools to help clinicians predict outcomes and select the best intervention for each individual, thereby reducing the burden of mental disorders, and taking psychiatry a step closer towards personalised medicine. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from Western Institutional Review Board screening protocol #20101611. The dissemination plan includes informing health professionals of results for clinical practice, submitting results to journals for peer-reviewed publication, presenting results at national and international conferences and making the dataset available to researchers and mental health professionals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02450240; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5786129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57861292018-01-31 Tulsa 1000: a naturalistic study protocol for multilevel assessment and outcome prediction in a large psychiatric sample Victor, Teresa A Khalsa, Sahib S Simmons, W Kyle Feinstein, Justin S Savitz, Jonathan Aupperle, Robin L Yeh, Hung-Wen Bodurka, Jerzy Paulus, Martin P BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Although neuroscience has made tremendous progress towards understanding the basic neural circuitry underlying important processes such as attention, memory and emotion, little progress has been made in applying these insights to psychiatric populations to make clinically meaningful treatment predictions. The overall aim of the Tulsa 1000 (T-1000) study is to use the NIMH Research Domain Criteria framework in order to establish a robust and reliable dimensional set of variables that quantifies the positive and negative valence, cognition and arousal domains, including interoception, to generate clinically useful treatment predictions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The T-1000 is a naturalistic study that will recruit, assess and longitudinally follow 1000 participants, including healthy controls and treatment-seeking individuals with mood, anxiety, substance use and eating disorders. Each participant will undergo interview, behavioural, biomarker and neuroimaging assessments over the course of 1 year. The study goal is to determine how disorders of affect, substance use and eating behaviour organise across different levels of analysis (molecules, genes, cells, neural circuits, physiology, behaviour and self-report) to predict symptom severity, treatment outcome and long-term prognosis. The data will be used to generate computational models based on Bayesian statistics. The final end point of this multilevel latent variable analysis will be standardised assessments that can be developed into clinical tools to help clinicians predict outcomes and select the best intervention for each individual, thereby reducing the burden of mental disorders, and taking psychiatry a step closer towards personalised medicine. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from Western Institutional Review Board screening protocol #20101611. The dissemination plan includes informing health professionals of results for clinical practice, submitting results to journals for peer-reviewed publication, presenting results at national and international conferences and making the dataset available to researchers and mental health professionals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02450240; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5786129/ /pubmed/29371263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016620 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Victor, Teresa A Khalsa, Sahib S Simmons, W Kyle Feinstein, Justin S Savitz, Jonathan Aupperle, Robin L Yeh, Hung-Wen Bodurka, Jerzy Paulus, Martin P Tulsa 1000: a naturalistic study protocol for multilevel assessment and outcome prediction in a large psychiatric sample |
title | Tulsa 1000: a naturalistic study protocol for multilevel assessment and outcome prediction in a large psychiatric sample |
title_full | Tulsa 1000: a naturalistic study protocol for multilevel assessment and outcome prediction in a large psychiatric sample |
title_fullStr | Tulsa 1000: a naturalistic study protocol for multilevel assessment and outcome prediction in a large psychiatric sample |
title_full_unstemmed | Tulsa 1000: a naturalistic study protocol for multilevel assessment and outcome prediction in a large psychiatric sample |
title_short | Tulsa 1000: a naturalistic study protocol for multilevel assessment and outcome prediction in a large psychiatric sample |
title_sort | tulsa 1000: a naturalistic study protocol for multilevel assessment and outcome prediction in a large psychiatric sample |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29371263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016620 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT victorteresaa tulsa1000anaturalisticstudyprotocolformultilevelassessmentandoutcomepredictioninalargepsychiatricsample AT khalsasahibs tulsa1000anaturalisticstudyprotocolformultilevelassessmentandoutcomepredictioninalargepsychiatricsample AT simmonswkyle tulsa1000anaturalisticstudyprotocolformultilevelassessmentandoutcomepredictioninalargepsychiatricsample AT feinsteinjustins tulsa1000anaturalisticstudyprotocolformultilevelassessmentandoutcomepredictioninalargepsychiatricsample AT savitzjonathan tulsa1000anaturalisticstudyprotocolformultilevelassessmentandoutcomepredictioninalargepsychiatricsample AT aupperlerobinl tulsa1000anaturalisticstudyprotocolformultilevelassessmentandoutcomepredictioninalargepsychiatricsample AT yehhungwen tulsa1000anaturalisticstudyprotocolformultilevelassessmentandoutcomepredictioninalargepsychiatricsample AT bodurkajerzy tulsa1000anaturalisticstudyprotocolformultilevelassessmentandoutcomepredictioninalargepsychiatricsample AT paulusmartinp tulsa1000anaturalisticstudyprotocolformultilevelassessmentandoutcomepredictioninalargepsychiatricsample |