Cargando…

Incremental predictive value of screening for anxiety and depression beyond current type 2 diabetes risk models: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether screening for anxiety and depression, an emerging risk factor for type 2 diabetes (T2D), adds clinically meaningful information beyond current T2D risk assessment tools. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: The 45 and Up Study is a large-sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atlantis, Evan, Ghassem Pour, Shima, Girosi, Federico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29362254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018255
_version_ 1783295742640652288
author Atlantis, Evan
Ghassem Pour, Shima
Girosi, Federico
author_facet Atlantis, Evan
Ghassem Pour, Shima
Girosi, Federico
author_sort Atlantis, Evan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether screening for anxiety and depression, an emerging risk factor for type 2 diabetes (T2D), adds clinically meaningful information beyond current T2D risk assessment tools. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: The 45 and Up Study is a large-scale prospective cohort of men and women aged 45 years and over, randomly sampled from the general population of New South Wales, Australia. 51 588 participants without self-reported diabetes at baseline (2006–2009) were followed up for approximately 3 years (2010). METHODS: T2D status was determined by self-reported doctor who diagnosed diabetes after the age of 30 years, and/or current use of metformin. Current symptoms of anxiety and/or depression were measured by the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). We determined the optimal cut-off point for K10 for predicting T2D using Tjur’s R2 and tested risk models with and without the K10 using logistic regression. We assessed performance measures for the incremental value of the K10 using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AROC), net reclassification improvement (NRI) and net benefit (NB) decision analytics with sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: T2D developed in 1076 individuals (52.4% men). A K10 score of ≥19 (prevalence 8.97%), adjusted for age and gender, was optimal for predicting incident T2D (sensitivity 77%, specificity 53% and positive predictive value 3%; OR 1.70 (95% CI 1.41 to 2.03, P<0.001). K10 score predicted incident T2D independent of current risk models, but did not improve corresponding AROC, NRI and NB statistics. Sensitivity analyses showed that this was partially explained by the baseline model and the small effect size of the K10 that was similar compared with other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and depressing screening with the K10 adds no meaningful incremental value in addition to current T2D risk assessments. The clinical importance of anxiety and depression screening in preventing T2D requires ongoing consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5786131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57861312018-01-31 Incremental predictive value of screening for anxiety and depression beyond current type 2 diabetes risk models: a prospective cohort study Atlantis, Evan Ghassem Pour, Shima Girosi, Federico BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether screening for anxiety and depression, an emerging risk factor for type 2 diabetes (T2D), adds clinically meaningful information beyond current T2D risk assessment tools. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: The 45 and Up Study is a large-scale prospective cohort of men and women aged 45 years and over, randomly sampled from the general population of New South Wales, Australia. 51 588 participants without self-reported diabetes at baseline (2006–2009) were followed up for approximately 3 years (2010). METHODS: T2D status was determined by self-reported doctor who diagnosed diabetes after the age of 30 years, and/or current use of metformin. Current symptoms of anxiety and/or depression were measured by the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). We determined the optimal cut-off point for K10 for predicting T2D using Tjur’s R2 and tested risk models with and without the K10 using logistic regression. We assessed performance measures for the incremental value of the K10 using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AROC), net reclassification improvement (NRI) and net benefit (NB) decision analytics with sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: T2D developed in 1076 individuals (52.4% men). A K10 score of ≥19 (prevalence 8.97%), adjusted for age and gender, was optimal for predicting incident T2D (sensitivity 77%, specificity 53% and positive predictive value 3%; OR 1.70 (95% CI 1.41 to 2.03, P<0.001). K10 score predicted incident T2D independent of current risk models, but did not improve corresponding AROC, NRI and NB statistics. Sensitivity analyses showed that this was partially explained by the baseline model and the small effect size of the K10 that was similar compared with other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and depressing screening with the K10 adds no meaningful incremental value in addition to current T2D risk assessments. The clinical importance of anxiety and depression screening in preventing T2D requires ongoing consideration. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5786131/ /pubmed/29362254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018255 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Diabetes and Endocrinology
Atlantis, Evan
Ghassem Pour, Shima
Girosi, Federico
Incremental predictive value of screening for anxiety and depression beyond current type 2 diabetes risk models: a prospective cohort study
title Incremental predictive value of screening for anxiety and depression beyond current type 2 diabetes risk models: a prospective cohort study
title_full Incremental predictive value of screening for anxiety and depression beyond current type 2 diabetes risk models: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Incremental predictive value of screening for anxiety and depression beyond current type 2 diabetes risk models: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Incremental predictive value of screening for anxiety and depression beyond current type 2 diabetes risk models: a prospective cohort study
title_short Incremental predictive value of screening for anxiety and depression beyond current type 2 diabetes risk models: a prospective cohort study
title_sort incremental predictive value of screening for anxiety and depression beyond current type 2 diabetes risk models: a prospective cohort study
topic Diabetes and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29362254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018255
work_keys_str_mv AT atlantisevan incrementalpredictivevalueofscreeningforanxietyanddepressionbeyondcurrenttype2diabetesriskmodelsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT ghassempourshima incrementalpredictivevalueofscreeningforanxietyanddepressionbeyondcurrenttype2diabetesriskmodelsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT girosifederico incrementalpredictivevalueofscreeningforanxietyanddepressionbeyondcurrenttype2diabetesriskmodelsaprospectivecohortstudy