Cargando…

A Comparison of Body Composition Across Two Phases of the Menstrual Cycle Utilizing Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Air Displacement Plethysmography, and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis

The purpose of this investigation was to utilize several different technologies to compare body composition results across two phases of the menstrual cycle, and to investigate whether being on hormonal birth control or not has any effect on results. The secondary purpose was to determine if body sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: HICKS, COURTENAY S., MCLESTER, CHERILYN N., ESMAT, TIFFANY A., MCLESTER, JOHN R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29399250
_version_ 1783295749823397888
author HICKS, COURTENAY S.
MCLESTER, CHERILYN N.
ESMAT, TIFFANY A.
MCLESTER, JOHN R.
author_facet HICKS, COURTENAY S.
MCLESTER, CHERILYN N.
ESMAT, TIFFANY A.
MCLESTER, JOHN R.
author_sort HICKS, COURTENAY S.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this investigation was to utilize several different technologies to compare body composition results across two phases of the menstrual cycle, and to investigate whether being on hormonal birth control or not has any effect on results. The secondary purpose was to determine if body satisfaction or perception of fluid retention differed across phases or between groups. A total of 39 females with a mean age of 26 ± 7 yrs were included in the study, 15 were on hormonal birth control (BC) and 24 were not (non-BC). Participants came into the lab for two trials: once while menstruating and another during the estimated pre-ovulation phase of the menstrual cycle. Demographic and body satisfaction questionnaires were completed prior to body composition testing. This testing included dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, BOD POD®, and three separate bioelectrical impedance analyses. Participants completed the body satisfaction questionnaire and all body composition tests on each trial. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were found between body fat percentage or total body water estimates taken during menses and pre-ovulation for the BC or non-BC group. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in overall body satisfaction across the two phases for the non-BC group, though the BC group had significantly lower body satisfaction during menses (P < 0.01). Participants in both groups identified feeling more bloated during menses (P < 0.001). Results suggest that menses should not affect the reliability of body composition estimates regardless of whether or not females are on hormonal BC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5786198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57861982018-01-31 A Comparison of Body Composition Across Two Phases of the Menstrual Cycle Utilizing Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Air Displacement Plethysmography, and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis HICKS, COURTENAY S. MCLESTER, CHERILYN N. ESMAT, TIFFANY A. MCLESTER, JOHN R. Int J Exerc Sci Original Research The purpose of this investigation was to utilize several different technologies to compare body composition results across two phases of the menstrual cycle, and to investigate whether being on hormonal birth control or not has any effect on results. The secondary purpose was to determine if body satisfaction or perception of fluid retention differed across phases or between groups. A total of 39 females with a mean age of 26 ± 7 yrs were included in the study, 15 were on hormonal birth control (BC) and 24 were not (non-BC). Participants came into the lab for two trials: once while menstruating and another during the estimated pre-ovulation phase of the menstrual cycle. Demographic and body satisfaction questionnaires were completed prior to body composition testing. This testing included dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, BOD POD®, and three separate bioelectrical impedance analyses. Participants completed the body satisfaction questionnaire and all body composition tests on each trial. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were found between body fat percentage or total body water estimates taken during menses and pre-ovulation for the BC or non-BC group. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in overall body satisfaction across the two phases for the non-BC group, though the BC group had significantly lower body satisfaction during menses (P < 0.01). Participants in both groups identified feeling more bloated during menses (P < 0.001). Results suggest that menses should not affect the reliability of body composition estimates regardless of whether or not females are on hormonal BC. Berkeley Electronic Press 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5786198/ /pubmed/29399250 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
HICKS, COURTENAY S.
MCLESTER, CHERILYN N.
ESMAT, TIFFANY A.
MCLESTER, JOHN R.
A Comparison of Body Composition Across Two Phases of the Menstrual Cycle Utilizing Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Air Displacement Plethysmography, and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
title A Comparison of Body Composition Across Two Phases of the Menstrual Cycle Utilizing Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Air Displacement Plethysmography, and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
title_full A Comparison of Body Composition Across Two Phases of the Menstrual Cycle Utilizing Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Air Displacement Plethysmography, and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
title_fullStr A Comparison of Body Composition Across Two Phases of the Menstrual Cycle Utilizing Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Air Displacement Plethysmography, and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Body Composition Across Two Phases of the Menstrual Cycle Utilizing Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Air Displacement Plethysmography, and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
title_short A Comparison of Body Composition Across Two Phases of the Menstrual Cycle Utilizing Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Air Displacement Plethysmography, and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
title_sort comparison of body composition across two phases of the menstrual cycle utilizing dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, air displacement plethysmography, and bioelectrical impedance analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29399250
work_keys_str_mv AT hickscourtenays acomparisonofbodycompositionacrosstwophasesofthemenstrualcycleutilizingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryairdisplacementplethysmographyandbioelectricalimpedanceanalysis
AT mclestercherilynn acomparisonofbodycompositionacrosstwophasesofthemenstrualcycleutilizingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryairdisplacementplethysmographyandbioelectricalimpedanceanalysis
AT esmattiffanya acomparisonofbodycompositionacrosstwophasesofthemenstrualcycleutilizingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryairdisplacementplethysmographyandbioelectricalimpedanceanalysis
AT mclesterjohnr acomparisonofbodycompositionacrosstwophasesofthemenstrualcycleutilizingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryairdisplacementplethysmographyandbioelectricalimpedanceanalysis
AT hickscourtenays comparisonofbodycompositionacrosstwophasesofthemenstrualcycleutilizingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryairdisplacementplethysmographyandbioelectricalimpedanceanalysis
AT mclestercherilynn comparisonofbodycompositionacrosstwophasesofthemenstrualcycleutilizingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryairdisplacementplethysmographyandbioelectricalimpedanceanalysis
AT esmattiffanya comparisonofbodycompositionacrosstwophasesofthemenstrualcycleutilizingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryairdisplacementplethysmographyandbioelectricalimpedanceanalysis
AT mclesterjohnr comparisonofbodycompositionacrosstwophasesofthemenstrualcycleutilizingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryairdisplacementplethysmographyandbioelectricalimpedanceanalysis