Cargando…
Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals
In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual do...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29040682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx052 |
_version_ | 1783295760307060736 |
---|---|
author | Abe, Yu Yoshida, Mitsuaki A Fujioka, Kurumi Kurosu, Yumiko Ujiie, Risa Yanagi, Aki Tsuyama, Naohiro Miura, Tomisato Inaba, Toshiya Kamiya, Kenji Sakai, Akira |
author_facet | Abe, Yu Yoshida, Mitsuaki A Fujioka, Kurumi Kurosu, Yumiko Ujiie, Risa Yanagi, Aki Tsuyama, Naohiro Miura, Tomisato Inaba, Toshiya Kamiya, Kenji Sakai, Akira |
author_sort | Abe, Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual dose–response curves (DRCs) for each laboratory because the analysis criteria differ between laboratories. We constructed the DRCs for radiation dose estimation (with three methods) using peripheral blood (PB) samples from five healthy individuals. Aliquots were irradiated with one of eight gamma-ray doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mGy), then cultured for 48 h. The number of chromosome aberrations (CAs) was analyzed by DCA, using Giemsa staining and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (centromere-FISH) and by chromosome painting (chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4) for Tr analysis. In DCA, there was large variation between individuals in the frequency of Dics formed, and the slopes of the DRCs were different. In Tr analysis, although variation was observed in the frequency of Tr, the slopes of the DRCs were similar after adjusting the background for age. Good correlation between the irradiation dose and the frequency of CAs formed was observed with these three DRCs. However, performing three different biological dosimetry assays simultaneously on PB from five donors nonetheless results in variation in the frequency of CAs formed, especially at doses of 50 mGy or less, highlighting the difficulty of biological dosimetry using these methods. We conclude that it might be difficult to construct universal DRCs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5786284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57862842018-01-30 Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals Abe, Yu Yoshida, Mitsuaki A Fujioka, Kurumi Kurosu, Yumiko Ujiie, Risa Yanagi, Aki Tsuyama, Naohiro Miura, Tomisato Inaba, Toshiya Kamiya, Kenji Sakai, Akira J Radiat Res Regular Paper In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual dose–response curves (DRCs) for each laboratory because the analysis criteria differ between laboratories. We constructed the DRCs for radiation dose estimation (with three methods) using peripheral blood (PB) samples from five healthy individuals. Aliquots were irradiated with one of eight gamma-ray doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mGy), then cultured for 48 h. The number of chromosome aberrations (CAs) was analyzed by DCA, using Giemsa staining and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (centromere-FISH) and by chromosome painting (chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4) for Tr analysis. In DCA, there was large variation between individuals in the frequency of Dics formed, and the slopes of the DRCs were different. In Tr analysis, although variation was observed in the frequency of Tr, the slopes of the DRCs were similar after adjusting the background for age. Good correlation between the irradiation dose and the frequency of CAs formed was observed with these three DRCs. However, performing three different biological dosimetry assays simultaneously on PB from five donors nonetheless results in variation in the frequency of CAs formed, especially at doses of 50 mGy or less, highlighting the difficulty of biological dosimetry using these methods. We conclude that it might be difficult to construct universal DRCs. Oxford University Press 2018-01 2017-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5786284/ /pubmed/29040682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx052 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Regular Paper Abe, Yu Yoshida, Mitsuaki A Fujioka, Kurumi Kurosu, Yumiko Ujiie, Risa Yanagi, Aki Tsuyama, Naohiro Miura, Tomisato Inaba, Toshiya Kamiya, Kenji Sakai, Akira Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals |
title | Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals |
title_full | Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals |
title_fullStr | Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals |
title_short | Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals |
title_sort | dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mgy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals |
topic | Regular Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29040682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abeyu doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals AT yoshidamitsuakia doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals AT fujiokakurumi doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals AT kurosuyumiko doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals AT ujiierisa doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals AT yanagiaki doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals AT tsuyamanaohiro doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals AT miuratomisato doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals AT inabatoshiya doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals AT kamiyakenji doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals AT sakaiakira doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals |