Cargando…

Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals

In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abe, Yu, Yoshida, Mitsuaki A, Fujioka, Kurumi, Kurosu, Yumiko, Ujiie, Risa, Yanagi, Aki, Tsuyama, Naohiro, Miura, Tomisato, Inaba, Toshiya, Kamiya, Kenji, Sakai, Akira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29040682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx052
_version_ 1783295760307060736
author Abe, Yu
Yoshida, Mitsuaki A
Fujioka, Kurumi
Kurosu, Yumiko
Ujiie, Risa
Yanagi, Aki
Tsuyama, Naohiro
Miura, Tomisato
Inaba, Toshiya
Kamiya, Kenji
Sakai, Akira
author_facet Abe, Yu
Yoshida, Mitsuaki A
Fujioka, Kurumi
Kurosu, Yumiko
Ujiie, Risa
Yanagi, Aki
Tsuyama, Naohiro
Miura, Tomisato
Inaba, Toshiya
Kamiya, Kenji
Sakai, Akira
author_sort Abe, Yu
collection PubMed
description In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual dose–response curves (DRCs) for each laboratory because the analysis criteria differ between laboratories. We constructed the DRCs for radiation dose estimation (with three methods) using peripheral blood (PB) samples from five healthy individuals. Aliquots were irradiated with one of eight gamma-ray doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mGy), then cultured for 48 h. The number of chromosome aberrations (CAs) was analyzed by DCA, using Giemsa staining and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (centromere-FISH) and by chromosome painting (chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4) for Tr analysis. In DCA, there was large variation between individuals in the frequency of Dics formed, and the slopes of the DRCs were different. In Tr analysis, although variation was observed in the frequency of Tr, the slopes of the DRCs were similar after adjusting the background for age. Good correlation between the irradiation dose and the frequency of CAs formed was observed with these three DRCs. However, performing three different biological dosimetry assays simultaneously on PB from five donors nonetheless results in variation in the frequency of CAs formed, especially at doses of 50 mGy or less, highlighting the difficulty of biological dosimetry using these methods. We conclude that it might be difficult to construct universal DRCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5786284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57862842018-01-30 Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals Abe, Yu Yoshida, Mitsuaki A Fujioka, Kurumi Kurosu, Yumiko Ujiie, Risa Yanagi, Aki Tsuyama, Naohiro Miura, Tomisato Inaba, Toshiya Kamiya, Kenji Sakai, Akira J Radiat Res Regular Paper In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual dose–response curves (DRCs) for each laboratory because the analysis criteria differ between laboratories. We constructed the DRCs for radiation dose estimation (with three methods) using peripheral blood (PB) samples from five healthy individuals. Aliquots were irradiated with one of eight gamma-ray doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mGy), then cultured for 48 h. The number of chromosome aberrations (CAs) was analyzed by DCA, using Giemsa staining and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (centromere-FISH) and by chromosome painting (chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4) for Tr analysis. In DCA, there was large variation between individuals in the frequency of Dics formed, and the slopes of the DRCs were different. In Tr analysis, although variation was observed in the frequency of Tr, the slopes of the DRCs were similar after adjusting the background for age. Good correlation between the irradiation dose and the frequency of CAs formed was observed with these three DRCs. However, performing three different biological dosimetry assays simultaneously on PB from five donors nonetheless results in variation in the frequency of CAs formed, especially at doses of 50 mGy or less, highlighting the difficulty of biological dosimetry using these methods. We conclude that it might be difficult to construct universal DRCs. Oxford University Press 2018-01 2017-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5786284/ /pubmed/29040682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx052 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Regular Paper
Abe, Yu
Yoshida, Mitsuaki A
Fujioka, Kurumi
Kurosu, Yumiko
Ujiie, Risa
Yanagi, Aki
Tsuyama, Naohiro
Miura, Tomisato
Inaba, Toshiya
Kamiya, Kenji
Sakai, Akira
Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals
title Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals
title_full Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals
title_fullStr Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals
title_full_unstemmed Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals
title_short Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals
title_sort dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mgy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals
topic Regular Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29040682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx052
work_keys_str_mv AT abeyu doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals
AT yoshidamitsuakia doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals
AT fujiokakurumi doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals
AT kurosuyumiko doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals
AT ujiierisa doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals
AT yanagiaki doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals
AT tsuyamanaohiro doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals
AT miuratomisato doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals
AT inabatoshiya doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals
AT kamiyakenji doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals
AT sakaiakira doseresponsecurvesforanalyzingofdicentricchromosomesandchromosometranslocationsfollowingdosesof1000mgyorlessbasedonirradiatedperipheralbloodsamplesfromfivehealthyindividuals