Cargando…

Ignoring Adjuvant Toxicity Falsifies the Safety Profile of Commercial Pesticides

Commercial formulations of pesticides are invariably not single ingredients. Instead they are cocktails of chemicals, composed of a designated pesticidal “active principle” and “other ingredients,” with the latter collectively also known as “adjuvants.” These include surfactants, antifoaming agents,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mesnage, Robin, Antoniou, Michael N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29404314
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00361
_version_ 1783295799155752960
author Mesnage, Robin
Antoniou, Michael N.
author_facet Mesnage, Robin
Antoniou, Michael N.
author_sort Mesnage, Robin
collection PubMed
description Commercial formulations of pesticides are invariably not single ingredients. Instead they are cocktails of chemicals, composed of a designated pesticidal “active principle” and “other ingredients,” with the latter collectively also known as “adjuvants.” These include surfactants, antifoaming agents, dyes, etc. Some adjuvants are added to influence the absorption and stability of the active principle and thus promote its pesticidal action. Currently, the health risk assessment of pesticides in the European Union and in the United States focuses almost exclusively on the stated active principle. Nonetheless, adjuvants can also be toxic in their own right with numerous negative health effects having been reported in humans and on the environment. Despite the known toxicity of adjuvants, they are regulated differently from active principles, with their toxic effects being generally ignored. Adjuvants are not subject to an acceptable daily intake, and they are not included in the health risk assessment of dietary exposures to pesticide residues. Here, we illustrate this gap in risk assessment by reference to glyphosate, the most used pesticide active ingredient. We also investigate the case of neonicotinoid insecticides, which are strongly suspected to be involved in bee and bumblebee colony collapse disorder. Authors of studies sometimes use the name of the active principle (for example glyphosate) when they are testing a commercial formulation containing multiple (active principle plus adjuvant) ingredients. This results in confusion in the scientific literature and within regulatory circles and leads to a misrepresentation of the safety profile of commercial pesticides. Urgent action is needed to lift the veil on the presence of adjuvants in food and human bodily fluids, as well as in the environment (such as in air, water, and soil) and to characterize their toxicological properties. This must be accompanied by regulatory precautionary measures to protect the environment and general human population from some toxic adjuvants that are currently missing from risk assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5786549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57865492018-02-05 Ignoring Adjuvant Toxicity Falsifies the Safety Profile of Commercial Pesticides Mesnage, Robin Antoniou, Michael N. Front Public Health Public Health Commercial formulations of pesticides are invariably not single ingredients. Instead they are cocktails of chemicals, composed of a designated pesticidal “active principle” and “other ingredients,” with the latter collectively also known as “adjuvants.” These include surfactants, antifoaming agents, dyes, etc. Some adjuvants are added to influence the absorption and stability of the active principle and thus promote its pesticidal action. Currently, the health risk assessment of pesticides in the European Union and in the United States focuses almost exclusively on the stated active principle. Nonetheless, adjuvants can also be toxic in their own right with numerous negative health effects having been reported in humans and on the environment. Despite the known toxicity of adjuvants, they are regulated differently from active principles, with their toxic effects being generally ignored. Adjuvants are not subject to an acceptable daily intake, and they are not included in the health risk assessment of dietary exposures to pesticide residues. Here, we illustrate this gap in risk assessment by reference to glyphosate, the most used pesticide active ingredient. We also investigate the case of neonicotinoid insecticides, which are strongly suspected to be involved in bee and bumblebee colony collapse disorder. Authors of studies sometimes use the name of the active principle (for example glyphosate) when they are testing a commercial formulation containing multiple (active principle plus adjuvant) ingredients. This results in confusion in the scientific literature and within regulatory circles and leads to a misrepresentation of the safety profile of commercial pesticides. Urgent action is needed to lift the veil on the presence of adjuvants in food and human bodily fluids, as well as in the environment (such as in air, water, and soil) and to characterize their toxicological properties. This must be accompanied by regulatory precautionary measures to protect the environment and general human population from some toxic adjuvants that are currently missing from risk assessments. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5786549/ /pubmed/29404314 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00361 Text en Copyright © 2018 Mesnage and Antoniou. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Mesnage, Robin
Antoniou, Michael N.
Ignoring Adjuvant Toxicity Falsifies the Safety Profile of Commercial Pesticides
title Ignoring Adjuvant Toxicity Falsifies the Safety Profile of Commercial Pesticides
title_full Ignoring Adjuvant Toxicity Falsifies the Safety Profile of Commercial Pesticides
title_fullStr Ignoring Adjuvant Toxicity Falsifies the Safety Profile of Commercial Pesticides
title_full_unstemmed Ignoring Adjuvant Toxicity Falsifies the Safety Profile of Commercial Pesticides
title_short Ignoring Adjuvant Toxicity Falsifies the Safety Profile of Commercial Pesticides
title_sort ignoring adjuvant toxicity falsifies the safety profile of commercial pesticides
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29404314
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00361
work_keys_str_mv AT mesnagerobin ignoringadjuvanttoxicityfalsifiesthesafetyprofileofcommercialpesticides
AT antonioumichaeln ignoringadjuvanttoxicityfalsifiesthesafetyprofileofcommercialpesticides