Cargando…

Efficacy of Internet-Based Guided Treatment for Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder: Rationale, Treatment Protocol, and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION: Genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD) not only adversely affects women’s sexuality and sexual satisfaction but is also associated with a wide range of psychosocial consequences such as reduced quality of life and well-being, mental health comorbidities, and relationship distr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zarski, Anna-Carlotta, Berking, Matthias, Ebert, David Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403395
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00260
_version_ 1783295831658463232
author Zarski, Anna-Carlotta
Berking, Matthias
Ebert, David Daniel
author_facet Zarski, Anna-Carlotta
Berking, Matthias
Ebert, David Daniel
author_sort Zarski, Anna-Carlotta
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD) not only adversely affects women’s sexuality and sexual satisfaction but is also associated with a wide range of psychosocial consequences such as reduced quality of life and well-being, mental health comorbidities, and relationship distress. Evidence for effective treatment options is scarce. AIM: This article describes the rationale, treatment protocol, and study design for a randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of an Internet-based guided intervention for GPPPD. METHOD: Two hundred women who meet the criteria for GPPPD and have not been able to experience sexual intercourse for at least the last 6 months will be recruited and randomly assigned either to the intervention group (IG) or a 6-month waitlist control group. Assessments take place at baseline (T1), peritreatment after completion of Session 5 in IG (T2), after completion of Session 8 or 12 weeks after randomization (T3), and after 6 months (T4). Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat and a completer basis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome will be sexual intercourse involving the insertion of the partner’s penis at posttreatment. Secondary outcomes include, e.g., improved non-intercourse penetration, sexual functioning, dyadic stress coping, reduced fear of sexuality and negative penetration-related cognitions. Fear of sexuality, penetration-related cognitions, and exercise intensity will be assessed as mediators of intercourse in the IG. Sexual dysfunctions of partners will be measured at baseline (T1) and investigated as a potential moderator of the primary treatment outcome. DISCUSSION: Given the burden associated with GPPPD and the need for specialized treatment, there is a surprising lack of evidence-based treatment options. This study aims to assess whether Internet-based interventions could contribute to closing this treatment gap. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS): DRKS00010228.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5786827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57868272018-02-05 Efficacy of Internet-Based Guided Treatment for Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder: Rationale, Treatment Protocol, and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial Zarski, Anna-Carlotta Berking, Matthias Ebert, David Daniel Front Psychiatry Psychiatry INTRODUCTION: Genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD) not only adversely affects women’s sexuality and sexual satisfaction but is also associated with a wide range of psychosocial consequences such as reduced quality of life and well-being, mental health comorbidities, and relationship distress. Evidence for effective treatment options is scarce. AIM: This article describes the rationale, treatment protocol, and study design for a randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of an Internet-based guided intervention for GPPPD. METHOD: Two hundred women who meet the criteria for GPPPD and have not been able to experience sexual intercourse for at least the last 6 months will be recruited and randomly assigned either to the intervention group (IG) or a 6-month waitlist control group. Assessments take place at baseline (T1), peritreatment after completion of Session 5 in IG (T2), after completion of Session 8 or 12 weeks after randomization (T3), and after 6 months (T4). Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat and a completer basis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome will be sexual intercourse involving the insertion of the partner’s penis at posttreatment. Secondary outcomes include, e.g., improved non-intercourse penetration, sexual functioning, dyadic stress coping, reduced fear of sexuality and negative penetration-related cognitions. Fear of sexuality, penetration-related cognitions, and exercise intensity will be assessed as mediators of intercourse in the IG. Sexual dysfunctions of partners will be measured at baseline (T1) and investigated as a potential moderator of the primary treatment outcome. DISCUSSION: Given the burden associated with GPPPD and the need for specialized treatment, there is a surprising lack of evidence-based treatment options. This study aims to assess whether Internet-based interventions could contribute to closing this treatment gap. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS): DRKS00010228. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5786827/ /pubmed/29403395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00260 Text en Copyright © 2018 Zarski, Berking and Ebert. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Zarski, Anna-Carlotta
Berking, Matthias
Ebert, David Daniel
Efficacy of Internet-Based Guided Treatment for Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder: Rationale, Treatment Protocol, and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title Efficacy of Internet-Based Guided Treatment for Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder: Rationale, Treatment Protocol, and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Efficacy of Internet-Based Guided Treatment for Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder: Rationale, Treatment Protocol, and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of Internet-Based Guided Treatment for Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder: Rationale, Treatment Protocol, and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Internet-Based Guided Treatment for Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder: Rationale, Treatment Protocol, and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Efficacy of Internet-Based Guided Treatment for Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder: Rationale, Treatment Protocol, and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort efficacy of internet-based guided treatment for genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder: rationale, treatment protocol, and design of a randomized controlled trial
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403395
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00260
work_keys_str_mv AT zarskiannacarlotta efficacyofinternetbasedguidedtreatmentforgenitopelvicpainpenetrationdisorderrationaletreatmentprotocolanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT berkingmatthias efficacyofinternetbasedguidedtreatmentforgenitopelvicpainpenetrationdisorderrationaletreatmentprotocolanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ebertdaviddaniel efficacyofinternetbasedguidedtreatmentforgenitopelvicpainpenetrationdisorderrationaletreatmentprotocolanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial