Cargando…

Evaluation and Comparison of 2 On‐Farm Tests for Estimating Somatic Cell Count in Quarter Milk Samples from Lactating Dairy Cattle

BACKGROUND: The somatic cell count (SCC) is commonly used to monitor udder health and diagnose subclinical intramammary infection (IMI) in dairy cattle. HYPOTHESIS: The Somaticell test (ST) and California mastitis test (CMT) are clinically useful cow‐side tests for diagnosing subclinical IMI. ANIMAL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kandeel, S.A., Megahed, A.A., Arnaout, F.K., Constable, P.D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29222815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14888
_version_ 1783295878752108544
author Kandeel, S.A.
Megahed, A.A.
Arnaout, F.K.
Constable, P.D.
author_facet Kandeel, S.A.
Megahed, A.A.
Arnaout, F.K.
Constable, P.D.
author_sort Kandeel, S.A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The somatic cell count (SCC) is commonly used to monitor udder health and diagnose subclinical intramammary infection (IMI) in dairy cattle. HYPOTHESIS: The Somaticell test (ST) and California mastitis test (CMT) are clinically useful cow‐side tests for diagnosing subclinical IMI. ANIMALS: One hundred and eleven dairy cows at dry‐off and 92 cows within 4–7 days postcalving. METHODS: Quarter foremilk samples were obtained and analyzed with a DeLaval cell counter (DCC, reference method), ST, and CMT. The ST was run in a simulated cow‐side manner using milk at 37°C instead of 0–8°C as recommended by the manufacturer. Test performance for diagnosing IMI (DCC SCC >200,000 cells/mL) was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the kappa coefficient (κ) at the optimal cut‐point for each test. The effect of milk/reagent temperature also was evaluated. RESULTS: Compared to the reference method, the ST run in a simulated cow‐side manner had an AUC = 0.68 and κ = 0.24 at dry‐off, and AUC = 0.74 and κ = 0.40 in fresh cows. The CMT performed much better than the ST in diagnosing subclinical IMI with AUC = 0.88 and κ = 0.77 at dry‐off, and AUC = 0.87 and κ = 0.76 in fresh cows. The measured ST value decreased with increasing temperature of the milk/reagent mixture. CONCLUSIONS/CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The ST is optimized for use on milk at 0–8°C and is therefore designed for on‐farm use on refrigerated milk samples. The ST is not suited for use as a cow‐side screening test for IMI because the milk temperature exceeds the recommended range for the test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5787175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57871752018-02-08 Evaluation and Comparison of 2 On‐Farm Tests for Estimating Somatic Cell Count in Quarter Milk Samples from Lactating Dairy Cattle Kandeel, S.A. Megahed, A.A. Arnaout, F.K. Constable, P.D. J Vet Intern Med FOOD AND FIBER ANIMAL BACKGROUND: The somatic cell count (SCC) is commonly used to monitor udder health and diagnose subclinical intramammary infection (IMI) in dairy cattle. HYPOTHESIS: The Somaticell test (ST) and California mastitis test (CMT) are clinically useful cow‐side tests for diagnosing subclinical IMI. ANIMALS: One hundred and eleven dairy cows at dry‐off and 92 cows within 4–7 days postcalving. METHODS: Quarter foremilk samples were obtained and analyzed with a DeLaval cell counter (DCC, reference method), ST, and CMT. The ST was run in a simulated cow‐side manner using milk at 37°C instead of 0–8°C as recommended by the manufacturer. Test performance for diagnosing IMI (DCC SCC >200,000 cells/mL) was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the kappa coefficient (κ) at the optimal cut‐point for each test. The effect of milk/reagent temperature also was evaluated. RESULTS: Compared to the reference method, the ST run in a simulated cow‐side manner had an AUC = 0.68 and κ = 0.24 at dry‐off, and AUC = 0.74 and κ = 0.40 in fresh cows. The CMT performed much better than the ST in diagnosing subclinical IMI with AUC = 0.88 and κ = 0.77 at dry‐off, and AUC = 0.87 and κ = 0.76 in fresh cows. The measured ST value decreased with increasing temperature of the milk/reagent mixture. CONCLUSIONS/CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The ST is optimized for use on milk at 0–8°C and is therefore designed for on‐farm use on refrigerated milk samples. The ST is not suited for use as a cow‐side screening test for IMI because the milk temperature exceeds the recommended range for the test. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-09 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5787175/ /pubmed/29222815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14888 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle FOOD AND FIBER ANIMAL
Kandeel, S.A.
Megahed, A.A.
Arnaout, F.K.
Constable, P.D.
Evaluation and Comparison of 2 On‐Farm Tests for Estimating Somatic Cell Count in Quarter Milk Samples from Lactating Dairy Cattle
title Evaluation and Comparison of 2 On‐Farm Tests for Estimating Somatic Cell Count in Quarter Milk Samples from Lactating Dairy Cattle
title_full Evaluation and Comparison of 2 On‐Farm Tests for Estimating Somatic Cell Count in Quarter Milk Samples from Lactating Dairy Cattle
title_fullStr Evaluation and Comparison of 2 On‐Farm Tests for Estimating Somatic Cell Count in Quarter Milk Samples from Lactating Dairy Cattle
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and Comparison of 2 On‐Farm Tests for Estimating Somatic Cell Count in Quarter Milk Samples from Lactating Dairy Cattle
title_short Evaluation and Comparison of 2 On‐Farm Tests for Estimating Somatic Cell Count in Quarter Milk Samples from Lactating Dairy Cattle
title_sort evaluation and comparison of 2 on‐farm tests for estimating somatic cell count in quarter milk samples from lactating dairy cattle
topic FOOD AND FIBER ANIMAL
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29222815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14888
work_keys_str_mv AT kandeelsa evaluationandcomparisonof2onfarmtestsforestimatingsomaticcellcountinquartermilksamplesfromlactatingdairycattle
AT megahedaa evaluationandcomparisonof2onfarmtestsforestimatingsomaticcellcountinquartermilksamplesfromlactatingdairycattle
AT arnaoutfk evaluationandcomparisonof2onfarmtestsforestimatingsomaticcellcountinquartermilksamplesfromlactatingdairycattle
AT constablepd evaluationandcomparisonof2onfarmtestsforestimatingsomaticcellcountinquartermilksamplesfromlactatingdairycattle