Cargando…

Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum Refractometry and Brix Refractometry for the Diagnosis of Inadequate Transfer of Passive Immunity in Calves

BACKGROUND: Transfer of passive immunity in calves can be assessed by direct measurement of immunoglobulin G (IgG) by methods such as radial immunodiffusion (RID) or turbidimetric immunoassay (TIA). IgG can also be measured indirectly by methods such as serum refractometry (REF) or Brix refractometr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buczinski, S., Gicquel, E., Fecteau, G., Takwoingi, Y., Chigerwe, M., Vandeweerd, J.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29210105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14893
_version_ 1783295882297344000
author Buczinski, S.
Gicquel, E.
Fecteau, G.
Takwoingi, Y.
Chigerwe, M.
Vandeweerd, J.M.
author_facet Buczinski, S.
Gicquel, E.
Fecteau, G.
Takwoingi, Y.
Chigerwe, M.
Vandeweerd, J.M.
author_sort Buczinski, S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transfer of passive immunity in calves can be assessed by direct measurement of immunoglobulin G (IgG) by methods such as radial immunodiffusion (RID) or turbidimetric immunoassay (TIA). IgG can also be measured indirectly by methods such as serum refractometry (REF) or Brix refractometry (BRIX). OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of REF and BRIX for assessment of inadequate transfer of passive immunity (ITPI) in calves. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. METHODS: Databases (PubMed and CAB Abstract, Searchable Proceedings of Animal Science) and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies. Studies were eligible if the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of REF or BRIX was determined using direct measurement of IgG by RID or turbidimetry as the reference standard. The study population included calves <14 days old that were fed with natural colostrum (colostrum replacement products were excluded). Quality assessment was performed by the QUADAS‐2 tool. Hierarchical models were used for meta‐analysis. RESULTS: From 1,291 references identified, 13 studies of 3,788 calves were included. Of these, 11 studies evaluated REF and 5 studies evaluated BRIX. The median (range) prevalence of ITPI (defined as calves with IgG <10 g/L by RID or TIA) was 21% (1.3–56%). Risk of bias and applicability concerns were generally low or unclear. For REF, summary estimates were obtained for 2 different cutoffs: 5.2 g/dL (6 studies) and 5.5 g/dL (5 studies). For the 5.2 g/dL cutoff, the summary sensitivity (95% CI) and specificity (95% CI) were 76.1% (63.8–85.2%) and 89.3% (82.3–93.7%), and 88.2% (80.2–93.3%) and 77.9% (74.5–81.0%) for the 5.5 g/dL cutoff. Due to the low number of studies using the same cutoffs, summary estimates could not be obtained for BRIX. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Despite their widespread use on dairy farms, evidence about the optimal strategy for using refractometry, including the optimal cutoff, are sparse (especially for BRIX). When using REF to rule out ITPI in herds, the 5.5 g/dL cutoff may be used whereas for ruling in ITPI, the 5.2 g/dL cutoff may be used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5787190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57871902018-02-08 Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum Refractometry and Brix Refractometry for the Diagnosis of Inadequate Transfer of Passive Immunity in Calves Buczinski, S. Gicquel, E. Fecteau, G. Takwoingi, Y. Chigerwe, M. Vandeweerd, J.M. J Vet Intern Med FOOD AND FIBER ANIMAL BACKGROUND: Transfer of passive immunity in calves can be assessed by direct measurement of immunoglobulin G (IgG) by methods such as radial immunodiffusion (RID) or turbidimetric immunoassay (TIA). IgG can also be measured indirectly by methods such as serum refractometry (REF) or Brix refractometry (BRIX). OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of REF and BRIX for assessment of inadequate transfer of passive immunity (ITPI) in calves. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. METHODS: Databases (PubMed and CAB Abstract, Searchable Proceedings of Animal Science) and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies. Studies were eligible if the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of REF or BRIX was determined using direct measurement of IgG by RID or turbidimetry as the reference standard. The study population included calves <14 days old that were fed with natural colostrum (colostrum replacement products were excluded). Quality assessment was performed by the QUADAS‐2 tool. Hierarchical models were used for meta‐analysis. RESULTS: From 1,291 references identified, 13 studies of 3,788 calves were included. Of these, 11 studies evaluated REF and 5 studies evaluated BRIX. The median (range) prevalence of ITPI (defined as calves with IgG <10 g/L by RID or TIA) was 21% (1.3–56%). Risk of bias and applicability concerns were generally low or unclear. For REF, summary estimates were obtained for 2 different cutoffs: 5.2 g/dL (6 studies) and 5.5 g/dL (5 studies). For the 5.2 g/dL cutoff, the summary sensitivity (95% CI) and specificity (95% CI) were 76.1% (63.8–85.2%) and 89.3% (82.3–93.7%), and 88.2% (80.2–93.3%) and 77.9% (74.5–81.0%) for the 5.5 g/dL cutoff. Due to the low number of studies using the same cutoffs, summary estimates could not be obtained for BRIX. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Despite their widespread use on dairy farms, evidence about the optimal strategy for using refractometry, including the optimal cutoff, are sparse (especially for BRIX). When using REF to rule out ITPI in herds, the 5.5 g/dL cutoff may be used whereas for ruling in ITPI, the 5.2 g/dL cutoff may be used. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-05 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5787190/ /pubmed/29210105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14893 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle FOOD AND FIBER ANIMAL
Buczinski, S.
Gicquel, E.
Fecteau, G.
Takwoingi, Y.
Chigerwe, M.
Vandeweerd, J.M.
Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum Refractometry and Brix Refractometry for the Diagnosis of Inadequate Transfer of Passive Immunity in Calves
title Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum Refractometry and Brix Refractometry for the Diagnosis of Inadequate Transfer of Passive Immunity in Calves
title_full Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum Refractometry and Brix Refractometry for the Diagnosis of Inadequate Transfer of Passive Immunity in Calves
title_fullStr Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum Refractometry and Brix Refractometry for the Diagnosis of Inadequate Transfer of Passive Immunity in Calves
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum Refractometry and Brix Refractometry for the Diagnosis of Inadequate Transfer of Passive Immunity in Calves
title_short Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum Refractometry and Brix Refractometry for the Diagnosis of Inadequate Transfer of Passive Immunity in Calves
title_sort systematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy of serum refractometry and brix refractometry for the diagnosis of inadequate transfer of passive immunity in calves
topic FOOD AND FIBER ANIMAL
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29210105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14893
work_keys_str_mv AT buczinskis systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracyofserumrefractometryandbrixrefractometryforthediagnosisofinadequatetransferofpassiveimmunityincalves
AT gicquele systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracyofserumrefractometryandbrixrefractometryforthediagnosisofinadequatetransferofpassiveimmunityincalves
AT fecteaug systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracyofserumrefractometryandbrixrefractometryforthediagnosisofinadequatetransferofpassiveimmunityincalves
AT takwoingiy systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracyofserumrefractometryandbrixrefractometryforthediagnosisofinadequatetransferofpassiveimmunityincalves
AT chigerwem systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracyofserumrefractometryandbrixrefractometryforthediagnosisofinadequatetransferofpassiveimmunityincalves
AT vandeweerdjm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracyofserumrefractometryandbrixrefractometryforthediagnosisofinadequatetransferofpassiveimmunityincalves