Cargando…

EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems

PURPOSE: From 2010 until July 2016, the EANM Research Ltd. (EARL) FDG-PET/CT accreditation program has collected over 2500 phantom datasets from approximately 200 systems and 150 imaging sites worldwide. The objective of this study is to report the findings and impact of the accreditation program on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaalep, Andres, Sera, Terez, Oyen, Wim, Krause, Bernd J., Chiti, Arturo, Liu, Yan, Boellaard, Ronald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29192365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3853-7
_version_ 1783295889858625536
author Kaalep, Andres
Sera, Terez
Oyen, Wim
Krause, Bernd J.
Chiti, Arturo
Liu, Yan
Boellaard, Ronald
author_facet Kaalep, Andres
Sera, Terez
Oyen, Wim
Krause, Bernd J.
Chiti, Arturo
Liu, Yan
Boellaard, Ronald
author_sort Kaalep, Andres
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: From 2010 until July 2016, the EANM Research Ltd. (EARL) FDG-PET/CT accreditation program has collected over 2500 phantom datasets from approximately 200 systems and 150 imaging sites worldwide. The objective of this study is to report the findings and impact of the accreditation program on the participating PET/CT systems. METHODS: To obtain and maintain EARL accredited status, sites were required to complete and submit two phantom scans - calibration quality control (CalQC), using a uniform cylindrical phantom and image quality control (IQQC), using a NEMA NU2–2007 body phantom. Average volumetric SUV bias and SUV recovery coefficients (RC) were calculated and the data evaluated on the basis of quality control (QC) type, approval status, PET/CT system manufacturer and submission order. RESULTS: SUV bias in 5% (n = 96) of all CalQC submissions (n = 1816) exceeded 10%. After corrective actions following EARL feedback, sites achieved 100% compliance within EARL specifications. 30% (n = 1381) of SUVmean and 23% (n = 1095) of SUVmax sphere recoveries from IQQC submissions failed to meet EARL accreditation criteria while after accreditation, failure rate decreased to 12% (n = 360) and 9% (n = 254), respectively. Most systems demonstrated longitudinal SUV bias reproducibility within ±5%, while RC values remained stable and generally within ±10% for the four largest and ±20% for the two smallest spheres. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of manufacturer or model, all investigated systems are able to comply with the EARL specifications. Within the EARL accreditation program, gross PET/CT calibration errors are successfully identified and longitudinal variability in PET/CT performances reduced. The program demonstrates that a harmonising accreditation procedure is feasible and achievable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-017-3853-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5787222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57872222018-02-02 EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems Kaalep, Andres Sera, Terez Oyen, Wim Krause, Bernd J. Chiti, Arturo Liu, Yan Boellaard, Ronald Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: From 2010 until July 2016, the EANM Research Ltd. (EARL) FDG-PET/CT accreditation program has collected over 2500 phantom datasets from approximately 200 systems and 150 imaging sites worldwide. The objective of this study is to report the findings and impact of the accreditation program on the participating PET/CT systems. METHODS: To obtain and maintain EARL accredited status, sites were required to complete and submit two phantom scans - calibration quality control (CalQC), using a uniform cylindrical phantom and image quality control (IQQC), using a NEMA NU2–2007 body phantom. Average volumetric SUV bias and SUV recovery coefficients (RC) were calculated and the data evaluated on the basis of quality control (QC) type, approval status, PET/CT system manufacturer and submission order. RESULTS: SUV bias in 5% (n = 96) of all CalQC submissions (n = 1816) exceeded 10%. After corrective actions following EARL feedback, sites achieved 100% compliance within EARL specifications. 30% (n = 1381) of SUVmean and 23% (n = 1095) of SUVmax sphere recoveries from IQQC submissions failed to meet EARL accreditation criteria while after accreditation, failure rate decreased to 12% (n = 360) and 9% (n = 254), respectively. Most systems demonstrated longitudinal SUV bias reproducibility within ±5%, while RC values remained stable and generally within ±10% for the four largest and ±20% for the two smallest spheres. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of manufacturer or model, all investigated systems are able to comply with the EARL specifications. Within the EARL accreditation program, gross PET/CT calibration errors are successfully identified and longitudinal variability in PET/CT performances reduced. The program demonstrates that a harmonising accreditation procedure is feasible and achievable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-017-3853-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-12-01 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5787222/ /pubmed/29192365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3853-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaalep, Andres
Sera, Terez
Oyen, Wim
Krause, Bernd J.
Chiti, Arturo
Liu, Yan
Boellaard, Ronald
EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems
title EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems
title_full EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems
title_fullStr EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems
title_full_unstemmed EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems
title_short EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems
title_sort eanm/earl fdg-pet/ct accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29192365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3853-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kaalepandres eanmearlfdgpetctaccreditationsummaryresultsfromthefirst200accreditedimagingsystems
AT seraterez eanmearlfdgpetctaccreditationsummaryresultsfromthefirst200accreditedimagingsystems
AT oyenwim eanmearlfdgpetctaccreditationsummaryresultsfromthefirst200accreditedimagingsystems
AT krauseberndj eanmearlfdgpetctaccreditationsummaryresultsfromthefirst200accreditedimagingsystems
AT chitiarturo eanmearlfdgpetctaccreditationsummaryresultsfromthefirst200accreditedimagingsystems
AT liuyan eanmearlfdgpetctaccreditationsummaryresultsfromthefirst200accreditedimagingsystems
AT boellaardronald eanmearlfdgpetctaccreditationsummaryresultsfromthefirst200accreditedimagingsystems