Cargando…
Quality of care during childbirth in Tanzania: identification of areas that need improvement
BACKGROUND: Making use of good, evidence based routines, for management of normal childbirth is essential to ensure quality of care and prevent, identify and manage complications if they occur. Two essential routine care interventions as defined by the World Health Organization are the use of the Pa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29374486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0463-1 |
_version_ | 1783295911065026560 |
---|---|
author | Solnes Miltenburg, Andrea Kiritta, Richard Forget Meguid, Tarek Sundby, Johanne |
author_facet | Solnes Miltenburg, Andrea Kiritta, Richard Forget Meguid, Tarek Sundby, Johanne |
author_sort | Solnes Miltenburg, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Making use of good, evidence based routines, for management of normal childbirth is essential to ensure quality of care and prevent, identify and manage complications if they occur. Two essential routine care interventions as defined by the World Health Organization are the use of the Partograph and Active Management of the Third Stage of Labour. Both interventions have been evaluated for their ability to assist health providers to detect and deal with complications. There is however little research about the quality of such interventions for routine care. Qualitative studies can help to understand how such complex interventions are implemented. This paper reports on findings from an observation study on maternity wards in Tanzania. METHODS: The study took place in the Lake Zone in Tanzania. Between 2014 and 2016 the first author observed and participated in the care for women on maternity wards in four rural and semi-urban health facilities. The data is a result of approximately 1300 hours of observations, systematically recorded primarily in observation notes and notes of informal conversations with health providers, women and their families. Detailed description of care processes were analysed using an ethnographic analysis approach focused on the sequential relationship of the ‘stages of labour’. Themes were identified through identification of recurrent patterns. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: 1) Women’s movement between rooms during birth, 2) health providers’ assumptions and hope for a ‘normal’ birth, 3) fear of poor outcomes that stimulates intervention during birth. Women move between different rooms during childbirth which influences the care they receive. Few women were monitored during their first stage of labour. Routine birth monitoring appeared absent due to health providers ’assumptions and hope for good outcomes. This was rooted in a general belief that most women eventually give birth without problems and the partograph did not correspond with health providers’ experience of the birth process. Contextual circumstances also limited health worker ability to act in case of complications. At the same time, fear for being held personally responsible for outcomes triggered active intervention in second stage of labour, even if there was no indication to intervene. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient monitoring leads to poor preparedness of health providers both for normal birth and in case of complications. As a result both underuse and overuse of interventions contribute to poor quality of care. Risk and complication management have for many years been prioritized at the expense of routine care for all women. Complex evaluations are needed to understand the current implementation gaps and find ways for improving quality of care for all women. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12978-018-0463-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5787311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57873112018-02-08 Quality of care during childbirth in Tanzania: identification of areas that need improvement Solnes Miltenburg, Andrea Kiritta, Richard Forget Meguid, Tarek Sundby, Johanne Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Making use of good, evidence based routines, for management of normal childbirth is essential to ensure quality of care and prevent, identify and manage complications if they occur. Two essential routine care interventions as defined by the World Health Organization are the use of the Partograph and Active Management of the Third Stage of Labour. Both interventions have been evaluated for their ability to assist health providers to detect and deal with complications. There is however little research about the quality of such interventions for routine care. Qualitative studies can help to understand how such complex interventions are implemented. This paper reports on findings from an observation study on maternity wards in Tanzania. METHODS: The study took place in the Lake Zone in Tanzania. Between 2014 and 2016 the first author observed and participated in the care for women on maternity wards in four rural and semi-urban health facilities. The data is a result of approximately 1300 hours of observations, systematically recorded primarily in observation notes and notes of informal conversations with health providers, women and their families. Detailed description of care processes were analysed using an ethnographic analysis approach focused on the sequential relationship of the ‘stages of labour’. Themes were identified through identification of recurrent patterns. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: 1) Women’s movement between rooms during birth, 2) health providers’ assumptions and hope for a ‘normal’ birth, 3) fear of poor outcomes that stimulates intervention during birth. Women move between different rooms during childbirth which influences the care they receive. Few women were monitored during their first stage of labour. Routine birth monitoring appeared absent due to health providers ’assumptions and hope for good outcomes. This was rooted in a general belief that most women eventually give birth without problems and the partograph did not correspond with health providers’ experience of the birth process. Contextual circumstances also limited health worker ability to act in case of complications. At the same time, fear for being held personally responsible for outcomes triggered active intervention in second stage of labour, even if there was no indication to intervene. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient monitoring leads to poor preparedness of health providers both for normal birth and in case of complications. As a result both underuse and overuse of interventions contribute to poor quality of care. Risk and complication management have for many years been prioritized at the expense of routine care for all women. Complex evaluations are needed to understand the current implementation gaps and find ways for improving quality of care for all women. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12978-018-0463-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5787311/ /pubmed/29374486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0463-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Solnes Miltenburg, Andrea Kiritta, Richard Forget Meguid, Tarek Sundby, Johanne Quality of care during childbirth in Tanzania: identification of areas that need improvement |
title | Quality of care during childbirth in Tanzania: identification of areas that need improvement |
title_full | Quality of care during childbirth in Tanzania: identification of areas that need improvement |
title_fullStr | Quality of care during childbirth in Tanzania: identification of areas that need improvement |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of care during childbirth in Tanzania: identification of areas that need improvement |
title_short | Quality of care during childbirth in Tanzania: identification of areas that need improvement |
title_sort | quality of care during childbirth in tanzania: identification of areas that need improvement |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29374486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0463-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT solnesmiltenburgandrea qualityofcareduringchildbirthintanzaniaidentificationofareasthatneedimprovement AT kirittarichardforget qualityofcareduringchildbirthintanzaniaidentificationofareasthatneedimprovement AT meguidtarek qualityofcareduringchildbirthintanzaniaidentificationofareasthatneedimprovement AT sundbyjohanne qualityofcareduringchildbirthintanzaniaidentificationofareasthatneedimprovement |