Cargando…

Calculating census tract-based life expectancy in New York state: a generalizable approach

BACKGROUND: Life expectancy at birth (LE) has been calculated for states and counties. LE estimates at these levels mask health disparities in local communities. There are no nationwide estimates at the sub-county level. We present a stepwise approach for calculating LE using census tracts in New Yo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Talbot, Thomas O., Done, Douglas H., Babcock, Gwen D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29373976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-018-0159-3
_version_ 1783295911297810432
author Talbot, Thomas O.
Done, Douglas H.
Babcock, Gwen D.
author_facet Talbot, Thomas O.
Done, Douglas H.
Babcock, Gwen D.
author_sort Talbot, Thomas O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Life expectancy at birth (LE) has been calculated for states and counties. LE estimates at these levels mask health disparities in local communities. There are no nationwide estimates at the sub-county level. We present a stepwise approach for calculating LE using census tracts in New York state to identify health disparities. METHODS: Our study included 2751 census tracts in New York state, but excluded New York City. We used population data from the 2010 United States Census and 2008–2010 mortality data from the state health department. Tracts were assigned to 99.97% of the deaths. We removed tracts which had a majority of people living in group quarters. Deaths in these tracts are often recorded elsewhere. Of the remaining 2679 tracts, 6.6% of the tracts had standard errors ≥ 2 years. A geographic aggregation tool was used to aggregate tracts with fewer than 60 deaths, and then aggregate areas that had standard errors of ≥ 2 years. RESULTS: Aggregation resulted in a 9.9% reduction in the number of areas. Tracts with < 2% of population living below the poverty level had a LE of 82.8 years, while tracts with a poverty level ≥ 25% had a LE of 75.5. We observed differences in LE in border areas, of up to 10.4 years, when excluding or including deaths of study area residents that occurred outside the study area. The range and standard deviation at the county level (77.5–82.8, SD = 1.2 years) were smaller than our final sub-county areas (64.7–92.0, SD = 3.3 years). The correlation between LE and poverty were similar and statistically significant (p < 0.0001) at the county (r = − 0.58) and sub-county level (r = − 0.58). The correlations between LE and percent African-American at the county level were (r = 0.11, p = 0.43) and at the sub-county level (r = − 0.25, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The proposed approach for geocoding and aggregation of mortality and population data provides a solution for health departments to produce stable empirically-derived LE estimates using data coded to the tract. Reliable estimates within sub-county areas are needed to aid public health officials in focusing preventive health programs in areas where health disparities would be masked by county level estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5787312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57873122018-02-08 Calculating census tract-based life expectancy in New York state: a generalizable approach Talbot, Thomas O. Done, Douglas H. Babcock, Gwen D. Popul Health Metr Research BACKGROUND: Life expectancy at birth (LE) has been calculated for states and counties. LE estimates at these levels mask health disparities in local communities. There are no nationwide estimates at the sub-county level. We present a stepwise approach for calculating LE using census tracts in New York state to identify health disparities. METHODS: Our study included 2751 census tracts in New York state, but excluded New York City. We used population data from the 2010 United States Census and 2008–2010 mortality data from the state health department. Tracts were assigned to 99.97% of the deaths. We removed tracts which had a majority of people living in group quarters. Deaths in these tracts are often recorded elsewhere. Of the remaining 2679 tracts, 6.6% of the tracts had standard errors ≥ 2 years. A geographic aggregation tool was used to aggregate tracts with fewer than 60 deaths, and then aggregate areas that had standard errors of ≥ 2 years. RESULTS: Aggregation resulted in a 9.9% reduction in the number of areas. Tracts with < 2% of population living below the poverty level had a LE of 82.8 years, while tracts with a poverty level ≥ 25% had a LE of 75.5. We observed differences in LE in border areas, of up to 10.4 years, when excluding or including deaths of study area residents that occurred outside the study area. The range and standard deviation at the county level (77.5–82.8, SD = 1.2 years) were smaller than our final sub-county areas (64.7–92.0, SD = 3.3 years). The correlation between LE and poverty were similar and statistically significant (p < 0.0001) at the county (r = − 0.58) and sub-county level (r = − 0.58). The correlations between LE and percent African-American at the county level were (r = 0.11, p = 0.43) and at the sub-county level (r = − 0.25, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The proposed approach for geocoding and aggregation of mortality and population data provides a solution for health departments to produce stable empirically-derived LE estimates using data coded to the tract. Reliable estimates within sub-county areas are needed to aid public health officials in focusing preventive health programs in areas where health disparities would be masked by county level estimates. BioMed Central 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5787312/ /pubmed/29373976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-018-0159-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Talbot, Thomas O.
Done, Douglas H.
Babcock, Gwen D.
Calculating census tract-based life expectancy in New York state: a generalizable approach
title Calculating census tract-based life expectancy in New York state: a generalizable approach
title_full Calculating census tract-based life expectancy in New York state: a generalizable approach
title_fullStr Calculating census tract-based life expectancy in New York state: a generalizable approach
title_full_unstemmed Calculating census tract-based life expectancy in New York state: a generalizable approach
title_short Calculating census tract-based life expectancy in New York state: a generalizable approach
title_sort calculating census tract-based life expectancy in new york state: a generalizable approach
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29373976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-018-0159-3
work_keys_str_mv AT talbotthomaso calculatingcensustractbasedlifeexpectancyinnewyorkstateageneralizableapproach
AT donedouglash calculatingcensustractbasedlifeexpectancyinnewyorkstateageneralizableapproach
AT babcockgwend calculatingcensustractbasedlifeexpectancyinnewyorkstateageneralizableapproach