Cargando…

Developmental constraint through negative pleiotropy in the zygomatic arch

BACKGROUND: Previous analysis suggested that the relative contribution of individual bones to regional skull lengths differ between inbred mouse strains. If the negative correlation of adjacent bone lengths is associated with genetic variation in a heterogeneous population, it would be an example of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Percival, Christopher J., Green, Rebecca, Roseman, Charles C., Gatti, Daniel M., Morgan, Judith L., Murray, Stephen A., Donahue, Leah Rae, Mayeux, Jessica M., Pollard, K. Michael, Hua, Kunjie, Pomp, Daniel, Marcucio, Ralph, Hallgrímsson, Benedikt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13227-018-0092-3
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Previous analysis suggested that the relative contribution of individual bones to regional skull lengths differ between inbred mouse strains. If the negative correlation of adjacent bone lengths is associated with genetic variation in a heterogeneous population, it would be an example of negative pleiotropy, which occurs when a genetic factor leads to opposite effects in two phenotypes. Confirming negative pleiotropy and determining its basis may reveal important information about the maintenance of overall skull integration and developmental constraint on skull morphology. RESULTS: We identified negative correlations between the lengths of the frontal and parietal bones in the midline cranial vault as well as the zygomatic bone and zygomatic process of the maxilla, which contribute to the zygomatic arch. Through gene association mapping of a large heterogeneous population of Diversity Outbred (DO) mice, we identified a quantitative trait locus on chromosome 17 driving the antagonistic contribution of these two zygomatic arch bones to total zygomatic arch length. Candidate genes in this region were identified and real-time PCR of the maxillary processes of DO founder strain embryos indicated differences in the RNA expression levels for two of the candidate genes, Camkmt and Six2. CONCLUSIONS: A genomic region underlying negative pleiotropy of two zygomatic arch bones was identified, which provides a mechanism for antagonism in component bone lengths while constraining overall zygomatic arch length. This type of mechanism may have led to variation in the contribution of individual bones to the zygomatic arch noted across mammals. Given that similar genetic and developmental mechanisms may underlie negative correlations in other parts of the skull, these results provide an important step toward understanding the developmental basis of evolutionary variation and constraint in skull morphology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13227-018-0092-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.