Cargando…

Inconsistencies in the drawing and interpretation of smiley faces: an observational study

OBJECTIVES: Pre-prepared smiley face symbols are used widely to gather information on, for example, satisfaction with services or health and well-being. We investigated how women and men of different ages respond when asked to draw a smiley face for themselves. Our objectives were to investigate how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clarke, Mike, McAneney, Helen, Chan, Fiona, Maguire, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29374494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3185-0
_version_ 1783295913149595648
author Clarke, Mike
McAneney, Helen
Chan, Fiona
Maguire, Lisa
author_facet Clarke, Mike
McAneney, Helen
Chan, Fiona
Maguire, Lisa
author_sort Clarke, Mike
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Pre-prepared smiley face symbols are used widely to gather information on, for example, satisfaction with services or health and well-being. We investigated how women and men of different ages respond when asked to draw a smiley face for themselves. Our objectives were to investigate how they differ by generating a unique set of data to explore this simple human behaviour and to illustrate the importance of considering gender and age mix in any study. RESULTS: We collected 723 drawings, in a variety of settings. Gender and age were provided for 676 drawings (women: 511; men: 165; ≤ 30 years: 335; > 30 years: 341). Although similar proportions of women and men drew some features, such as closed mouths; women and those aged ≤ 30 were less likely to draw noses and outlines around the faces, and more likely to draw a classic smiley face. Our analyses provide a novel way to highlight that whenever self-reported outcomes are compared between groups, the group composition for characteristics such as gender and age may need to be considered carefully to explore whether differences in outcomes might simply arise from imbalances in those characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5787320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57873202018-02-08 Inconsistencies in the drawing and interpretation of smiley faces: an observational study Clarke, Mike McAneney, Helen Chan, Fiona Maguire, Lisa BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVES: Pre-prepared smiley face symbols are used widely to gather information on, for example, satisfaction with services or health and well-being. We investigated how women and men of different ages respond when asked to draw a smiley face for themselves. Our objectives were to investigate how they differ by generating a unique set of data to explore this simple human behaviour and to illustrate the importance of considering gender and age mix in any study. RESULTS: We collected 723 drawings, in a variety of settings. Gender and age were provided for 676 drawings (women: 511; men: 165; ≤ 30 years: 335; > 30 years: 341). Although similar proportions of women and men drew some features, such as closed mouths; women and those aged ≤ 30 were less likely to draw noses and outlines around the faces, and more likely to draw a classic smiley face. Our analyses provide a novel way to highlight that whenever self-reported outcomes are compared between groups, the group composition for characteristics such as gender and age may need to be considered carefully to explore whether differences in outcomes might simply arise from imbalances in those characteristics. BioMed Central 2018-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5787320/ /pubmed/29374494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3185-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Note
Clarke, Mike
McAneney, Helen
Chan, Fiona
Maguire, Lisa
Inconsistencies in the drawing and interpretation of smiley faces: an observational study
title Inconsistencies in the drawing and interpretation of smiley faces: an observational study
title_full Inconsistencies in the drawing and interpretation of smiley faces: an observational study
title_fullStr Inconsistencies in the drawing and interpretation of smiley faces: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Inconsistencies in the drawing and interpretation of smiley faces: an observational study
title_short Inconsistencies in the drawing and interpretation of smiley faces: an observational study
title_sort inconsistencies in the drawing and interpretation of smiley faces: an observational study
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29374494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3185-0
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkemike inconsistenciesinthedrawingandinterpretationofsmileyfacesanobservationalstudy
AT mcaneneyhelen inconsistenciesinthedrawingandinterpretationofsmileyfacesanobservationalstudy
AT chanfiona inconsistenciesinthedrawingandinterpretationofsmileyfacesanobservationalstudy
AT maguirelisa inconsistenciesinthedrawingandinterpretationofsmileyfacesanobservationalstudy